SOL-JLPon Raydium CLMMCLMM
- Chain
- Solana
- TVL
- TVL $186.74K
- APR
- 3.6% APR
- 24h Volume
- $72.34K 24h vol
- Fee tier
- 0.03% fee
- Pool address
- 8KbrpeSR…4U7Q · observed 2026-09-25
new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score is 56/100, with Enter at 50/100, Hold at 62/100, and Exit at 19/100; the live verdict is HOLD, driven by ai_engine=hold. Its #305 rank among 8415 raydium-clmm pools places it above most listed pools, but the hold verdict indicates that this ranking is not an unconditional entry signal: the pool has fee-based activity, yet its MEMECOIN exposure and unverified range history require monitoring. The assessment would weaken if TVL drained, volume fell enough to compress 3.6%, or fee sustainability deteriorated; it would strengthen if liquidity and fee-generating volume persisted without increased incentive dependence.
Computed 2026-09-25 15:49 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$186.74K
Total value locked
$72.34K
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up3.6%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ 2.0%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Wait & Monitor
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Enter only with a range you can monitor actively, and rebalance or exit when SOL-JLP moves outside that range or when daily volume no longer appears sufficient to support 3.6%; do not wait for farm incentives to justify staying, because the current reward component is absent.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 3.6% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 3.6% | — | — |
| Volume | $72.34K | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $21.71 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#4 of 22 SOL-JLP pools
by AI Farmer Score
#792 of 17344 on raydium-clmm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 3% of all Solana pools
overall rank #3510 of 122041
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the SOL-JLP liquidity pool on Raydium CLMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and JLP into a shared trading pool and receiving part of the swap fees. Your holdings can become more concentrated in one asset after prices move, and this memecoin-linked pool may be harder to exit when trading activity falls.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
The return decomposes into 3.6% from trading fees and 0.1% from rewards. 98% of the reported yield is trading-fee income, so APR depends on sustained volume rather than a subsidy. The current reward component is absent, while the longer-term reward dependency and any future emissions schedule are not established; fee income should therefore be treated as the primary support for the quoted APR.
shieldRisk Assessment
Recent impermanent-loss history is not available, and recent tick-in-range history is also unavailable, so realized range efficiency cannot be assessed from these metrics. As a MEMECOIN pool, SOL-JLP is exposed to sharp relative-price moves, rapid liquidity changes, and potentially difficult exits when attention fades. Emission decay is not currently the main risk because rewards do not contribute to the quoted return, but any future incentive program should be evaluated for its expiry schedule and the likely post-emission exit pressure.
tollSOL Context
SOL is the pool's more liquid and broadly traded asset, with deeper liquidity across Solana than JLP. SOL price moves relative to JLP determine the pool's inventory mix and can create impermanent loss when the two assets diverge; a narrow range increases fee efficiency but makes that exposure more sensitive to SOL moves.
tollJLP Context
JLP is the pool's venue-specific, memecoin-linked side of the pair and generally has less broad liquidity than SOL across Solana markets. Changes in JLP demand, composition, or liquidity can move its price independently of SOL, increasing divergence risk and making exit conditions more important for this LP.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and JLP into a shared trading pool and receiving part of the swap fees. Your holdings can become more concentrated in one asset after prices move, and this memecoin-linked pool may be harder to exit when trading activity falls.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- 8KbrpeSRYXYjWSSdG7gE1tR7Go8MmKKxKaei1gGc4U7Q
- Protocol
- Raydium CLMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- Concentrated Liquidity (CLMM)
- Token A
- SOL (So111111…)
- Token B
- JLP (27G8MtK7…)
- Created
- 4/20/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
0%
APR
1%
APR
0%
APR
2%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-clmm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
Emission decay has limited immediate effect because 0.1% is currently absent and 98% of yield comes from trading fees. If rewards are introduced later, the quoted APR could decline as those emissions decay unless trading volume supports a higher 3.6%.
Emission decay has limited immediate effect because 0.1% is currently absent and 98% of yield comes from trading fees. If rewards are introduced later, the quoted APR could decline as those emissions decay unless trading volume supports a higher 3.6%.
The pool would rely on trading fees rather than farm payments. Since 0.1% is currently absent and 98% is fee-derived, the main risk is reduced liquidity and lower volume after incentives end, which could reduce 3.6%.
The pool would rely on trading fees rather than farm payments. Since 0.1% is currently absent and 98% is fee-derived, the main risk is reduced liquidity and lower volume after incentives end, which could reduce 3.6%.
Risk is high relative to a major-asset pool because JLP can move sharply against SOL and liquidity can contract quickly. The pool's fee income is supported by activity, but unavailable recent impermanent-loss and range-history data make the realized risk harder to quantify.
Risk is high relative to a major-asset pool because JLP can move sharply against SOL and liquidity can contract quickly. The pool's fee income is supported by activity, but unavailable recent impermanent-loss and range-history data make the realized risk harder to quantify.
For SOL-JLP, consider exiting when liquidity or fee-generating volume deteriorates materially, when price leaves your selected range and cannot be monitored, or when the pool becomes dependent on incentives rather than 3.6%. A sustained TVL drain is a stronger exit signal than a single quiet trading day.
For SOL-JLP, consider exiting when liquidity or fee-generating volume deteriorates materially, when price leaves your selected range and cannot be monitored, or when the pool becomes dependent on incentives rather than 3.6%. A sustained TVL drain is a stronger exit signal than a single quiet trading day.
There is no reliable fixed break-even period because recent impermanent-loss data is unavailable and future fee volume is uncertain. At 3.6%, fees may offset divergence losses over time, but a sharp SOL-JLP move or falling volume can extend the payback period substantially.
There is no reliable fixed break-even period because recent impermanent-loss data is unavailable and future fee volume is uncertain. At 3.6%, fees may offset divergence losses over time, but a sharp SOL-JLP move or falling volume can extend the payback period substantially.
