new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score of 17/100 places this pool in a middling risk-adjusted position: the Enter score of 15/100 is weaker than the Hold score of 20/100, while the Exit score of 80/100 is lowest. The live verdict is EXIT, driven by ai_engine=hold, and the pool ranks #1108 of 8541 raydium-amm pools, so it is not near the strongest cohort despite the fee-only structure. A TVL drain, further volume contraction, or collapse in fee income would weaken the assessment; sustained volume growth and deeper liquidity would be needed to improve it.
Computed 2026-10-30 07:29 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$20.93K
Total value locked
$0.00
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up0.0%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ -1.5%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Avoid
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Enter only with a pre-set exit trigger: reassess or withdraw if volume-to-TVL remains below the current 0.00x after a sustained decline in CTA activity, or if price leaves your chosen range and you cannot monitor and rebalance it promptly.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 1 SOL-CTA pools
by AI Farmer Score
#15854 of 94821 on raydium-amm
by AI Farmer Score
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the SOL-CTA liquidity pool on Raydium AMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and CTA into the pool so other users can trade between them, while you receive a share of trading fees. Your result can be worse than simply holding the two tokens if their prices move sharply apart, and the small pool size can make exiting harder.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
Yield decomposes into 0.0% from trading fees and 0.0% from rewards, with 0% of yield coming from fees. No current reward component is contributing to APR, so emission decay is not presently the main source of yield decline; future fee income remains dependent on trading volume and liquidity retention.
shieldRisk Assessment
Recent impermanent-loss history and tick-range observations are not available, so realized price divergence and range utilization cannot be assessed from the supplied record. As a MEMECOIN pool, CTA introduces substantial token-specific volatility and liquidity risk alongside SOL exposure. Emission decay is relevant if incentives are introduced later, while exit timing matters because a thin pool can experience wider execution costs and declining fee income when traders leave.
tollSOL Context
SOL is the established network asset in this pair and generally has substantially deeper liquidity across Solana venues than this pool. SOL price moves against CTA change the pool's asset composition and can create impermanent loss relative to simply holding both assets, while SOL's broader liquidity may make its leg easier to hedge or exit.
tollCTA Context
CTA is the memecoin side of the pair, so its price discovery and liquidity should be evaluated beyond this pool before committing capital. A sharp CTA move against SOL can increase impermanent loss, and declining CTA activity can reduce fee income and make exit execution more difficult.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and CTA into the pool so other users can trade between them, while you receive a share of trading fees. Your result can be worse than simply holding the two tokens if their prices move sharply apart, and the small pool size can make exiting harder.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- 8L45JDin3aTHPq1NgFJj4A4yDtKBAoukauKDKQAZeud4
- Protocol
- Raydium AMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- AMM
- Token A
- SOL (So111111…)
- Token B
- CTA (DJfRBwZx…)
- Created
- 6/24/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
6%
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
2%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-amm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The current APR is entirely fee-funded: 0.0% fee APR plus 0.0% reward APR, with 0% of yield from fees. Because the reward component is currently zero, emission decay does not directly reduce the stated APR, but future incentives would be time-sensitive if added.
The current APR is entirely fee-funded: 0.0% fee APR plus 0.0% reward APR, with 0% of yield from fees. Because the reward component is currently zero, emission decay does not directly reduce the stated APR, but future incentives would be time-sensitive if added.
There is no current reward contribution reflected in the pool's APR, so incentive expiry would not remove an existing reward stream in the supplied data. Fee income would remain the relevant source of return, at 0.0%, subject to changes in trading volume and TVL.
There is no current reward contribution reflected in the pool's APR, so incentive expiry would not remove an existing reward stream in the supplied data. Fee income would remain the relevant source of return, at 0.0%, subject to changes in trading volume and TVL.
Risk is elevated because CTA can move sharply against SOL, creating impermanent loss and token-specific liquidity risk. The pool's small TVL of $21K and volume-to-TVL ratio of 0.00x also make fee income and exit execution sensitive to changes in trading activity.
Risk is elevated because CTA can move sharply against SOL, creating impermanent loss and token-specific liquidity risk. The pool's small TVL of $21K and volume-to-TVL ratio of 0.00x also make fee income and exit execution sensitive to changes in trading activity.
Consider exiting when CTA activity and fee generation deteriorate, when liquidity drains, or when price leaves your selected range and you cannot actively rebalance. For this pool, a sustained deterioration from 0.00x or a weakening of the fee-based 0.0% APR would be a concrete reassessment trigger.
Consider exiting when CTA activity and fee generation deteriorate, when liquidity drains, or when price leaves your selected range and you cannot actively rebalance. For this pool, a sustained deterioration from 0.00x or a weakening of the fee-based 0.0% APR would be a concrete reassessment trigger.
A simple gross-fee estimate would be approximately the reciprocal of 0.0% in years, assuming the annualized fee rate persists and prices do not change. That is not a reliable break-even forecast because the available recent impermanent-loss and range data are insufficient, and SOL-CTA price divergence can exceed fee income.
A simple gross-fee estimate would be approximately the reciprocal of 0.0% in years, assuming the annualized fee rate persists and prices do not change. That is not a reliable break-even forecast because the available recent impermanent-loss and range data are insufficient, and SOL-CTA price divergence can exceed fee income.
