new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score of 41/100 places SOL-FRED in a middle-of-the-field position, ranked #475 of 2403 raydium-amm pools. Its Enter score of 35/100, Hold score of 47/100, Exit score of 33/100, and live verdict of HOLD indicate that the current assessment favors monitoring an existing position rather than treating the pool as an unqualified entry. The verdict driver is ai_engine=hold, while the fee-only structure is a material positive and the low 0.06x turnover ratio is a constraint. A TVL drain, collapse in trading fees, or materially weaker FRED liquidity would change the assessment; sustained volume and stable liquidity would support it.
Computed 2026-07-24 00:16 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$201.21K
Total value locked
$11.31K
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up7.2%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ -16.2%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Wait & Monitor
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Enter only with a range you can monitor, and rebalance or exit when the position leaves that range; treat a sustained decline in volume or TVL as an exit signal because the reported return is entirely fee-funded.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 7.2% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 6.9% | — | — |
| Volume | $11.31K | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $28.28 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 4 SOL-FRED pools
by AI Farmer Score
#113 of 34958 on raydium-amm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 2% of all Solana pools
overall rank #730 of 66494
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the SOL-FRED liquidity pool on raydium-amm. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and FRED into a shared trading pool and receiving part of the trading fees. The amount of each token you own can change as traders buy and sell, and a fall in FRED activity or price can make the position harder to exit profitably.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
The stated return decomposes into 6.9% from trading fees and 0.2% from rewards, with 97% of yield sourced from fees. Reward dependency is not established, so future emission effects cannot be assessed from the available data; the current APR is not being supported by reward payments.
shieldRisk Assessment
A usable seven-day impermanent-loss reading is not available, and recent tick-range exposure is also not reported, so recent path-dependent LP risk cannot be quantified from these metrics. As a MEMECOIN pool, SOL-FRED is exposed to abrupt FRED repricing, shallow or migrating liquidity, and fee deterioration if trading interest fades. Emission decay is not currently reducing the reported return because rewards contribute nothing, but exit timing still matters if liquidity or volume contracts.
tollSOL Context
SOL is the deeper-liquidity asset in this pair and can generally be traded across many Solana venues. For this LP, SOL price movement changes the pool balance against FRED; a sustained SOL move can increase inventory divergence and leave the LP holding proportionally more of the weaker-performing asset.
tollFRED Context
FRED is the memecoin side of the pair, with liquidity and price discovery likely more dependent on this pool and related venues than SOL. A sharp FRED rally or decline can rebalance the LP toward FRED or SOL and may increase execution costs when exiting, especially if pool liquidity falls.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and FRED into a shared trading pool and receiving part of the trading fees. The amount of each token you own can change as traders buy and sell, and a fall in FRED activity or price can make the position harder to exit profitably.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- 8SQNDszijLRLnXmfQBPzxbBhSUjRJur7CEfqcQZQz1hQ
- Protocol
- raydium-amm
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- AMM
- Token A
- SOL (So111111…)
- Token B
- FRED (CNvitvFn…)
- Created
- 4/22/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
open_in_newView all raydium-amm pools →By Protocol
hubAll raydium-amm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
Current rewards contribute 0.2%, while fees contribute 6.9% and account for 97% of the reported 7.2%. Because the present return is fee-funded, emission decay does not currently reduce the stated APR directly, but any future reward program would add a separate time-dependent component.
Current rewards contribute 0.2%, while fees contribute 6.9% and account for 97% of the reported 7.2%. Because the present return is fee-funded, emission decay does not currently reduce the stated APR directly, but any future reward program would add a separate time-dependent component.
The current pool reports no reward contribution, so expiration would not remove part of the stated 7.2% at present. Fee income would remain dependent on $11K volume, the 0.06x turnover ratio, and continued trader demand.
The current pool reports no reward contribution, so expiration would not remove part of the stated 7.2% at present. Fee income would remain dependent on $11K volume, the 0.06x turnover ratio, and continued trader demand.
Risk is high relative to a SOL pair with a more established second asset because FRED can reprice sharply and liquidity can migrate. The pool has $201K TVL, $11K 24-hour volume, and no usable recent impermanent-loss or tick-range history for estimating how those risks have recently affected LPs.
Risk is high relative to a SOL pair with a more established second asset because FRED can reprice sharply and liquidity can migrate. The pool has $201K TVL, $11K 24-hour volume, and no usable recent impermanent-loss or tick-range history for estimating how those risks have recently affected LPs.
For SOL-FRED, reassess when the position leaves its selected range, when FRED liquidity or pool TVL declines materially, or when fee flow no longer compensates for exposure. Because the return is entirely fee-funded, a persistent reduction in trading activity is a direct reason to reduce or exit the position.
For SOL-FRED, reassess when the position leaves its selected range, when FRED liquidity or pool TVL declines materially, or when fee flow no longer compensates for exposure. Because the return is entirely fee-funded, a persistent reduction in trading activity is a direct reason to reduce or exit the position.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history is unavailable. Fees accrue at 6.9%, but that rate is not a guaranteed recovery schedule and can fall if volume or liquidity changes.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history is unavailable. Fees accrue at 6.9%, but that rate is not a guaranteed recovery schedule and can fall if volume or liquidity changes.
