new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score of 50/100 places this pool in a mixed rather than decisive position: Enter is 45/100, Hold is 56/100, and Exit is 25/100, with the live verdict at HOLD. Its rank of #621 among 8541 raydium-amm pools indicates that it scores above most listed pools on the framework, but not enough to establish a strong entry signal. The stated verdict driver is ai_engine=hold, consistent with fee-funded activity offset by memecoin and liquidity uncertainty. A TVL drain, a collapse in trading-fee APR, or persistent loss of PIPPIN liquidity would weaken the assessment; sustained volume with stable liquidity and fee income would strengthen it.
Computed 2026-09-05 18:19 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$4.18M
Total value locked
$562.82K
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up13.3%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ 5.4%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Wait & Monitor
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Enter with a defined price range and review it whenever SOL/PIPPIN leaves that range or the pool's Vol/TVL ratio falls materially from 0.13x; rebalance only after comparing expected future fees with the cost and impermanent-loss exposure of remaining in the position.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 13.3% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 12.5% | — | — |
| Volume | $562.82K | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $1.41K | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#2 of 16 SOL-pippin pools
by AI Farmer Score
#1496 of 61707 on raydium-amm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 4% of all Solana pools
overall rank #3643 of 107256
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the SOL-pippin liquidity pool on Raydium AMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and PIPPIN into a shared pool so other users can trade between them. You receive part of the trading fees, but the pool can leave you holding more of the asset that has fallen relative to the other, and the value can be lower than simply holding both assets.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
The Total APR of 13.3% decomposes into a fee-only APR of 12.5% and a reward-only APR of 0.8%. Fee sustainability is 94%, so the stated return depends on trading activity rather than token emissions. Reward dependency is not established, and no reward schedule should be assumed from the current figures.
shieldRisk Assessment
A seven-day impermanent-loss history is not available, and tick-in-range performance for that period is also not reported, so recent range efficiency cannot be verified. As a MEMECOIN pool, SOL-PIPPIN carries substantial risk from rapid PIPPIN price moves, shallow or retreating liquidity, and one-sided demand; emission decay is less relevant while reward APR is zero, but exit timing still matters because fee income can fall quickly when attention and volume leave the pair.
tollSOL Context
SOL is the established base asset in this pair and generally has materially deeper liquidity across Solana markets than PIPPIN. For this LP, a SOL rally or decline relative to PIPPIN changes the inventory mix through rebalancing, while SOL's broader liquidity can make the SOL side easier to value and exit than the memecoin side.
tollpippin Context
PIPPIN is the pool's memecoin exposure and is likely to contribute most of the pair-specific volatility and liquidity risk. A sharp PIPPIN move relative to SOL can increase the share of the weaker-performing asset held by the LP, while falling PIPPIN demand can reduce swaps and therefore fee generation.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and PIPPIN into a shared pool so other users can trade between them. You receive part of the trading fees, but the pool can leave you holding more of the asset that has fallen relative to the other, and the value can be lower than simply holding both assets.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- 8WwcNqdZjCY5Pt7AkhupAFknV2txca9sq6YBkGzLbvdt
- Protocol
- Raydium AMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- AMM
- Token A
- SOL (So111111…)
- Token B
- pippin (Dfh5DzRg…)
- Created
- 4/22/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
9%
APR
103%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-amm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
Current reward APR is 0.8%, so the stated Total APR of 13.3% is not currently supported by farm emissions. If incentives are introduced later, emission decay could reduce the reward component while fee income would still depend on trading volume.
Current reward APR is 0.8%, so the stated Total APR of 13.3% is not currently supported by farm emissions. If incentives are introduced later, emission decay could reduce the reward component while fee income would still depend on trading volume.
The current figures show reward-only APR of 0.8% and fee sustainability of 94%, so there is no reported reward contribution to remove at present. If incentives are added and later expire, the remaining return would come from trading fees, which can fall if volume declines.
The current figures show reward-only APR of 0.8% and fee sustainability of 94%, so there is no reported reward contribution to remove at present. If incentives are added and later expire, the remaining return would come from trading fees, which can fall if volume declines.
The risk is high relative to a major-asset pair because PIPPIN can move sharply, liquidity can retreat, and fee income depends on continued trading. Recent seven-day impermanent-loss and tick-range results are not reported, so the pool's recent loss and range behavior cannot be quantified.
The risk is high relative to a major-asset pair because PIPPIN can move sharply, liquidity can retreat, and fee income depends on continued trading. Recent seven-day impermanent-loss and tick-range results are not reported, so the pool's recent loss and range behavior cannot be quantified.
Consider exiting when PIPPIN liquidity or trading activity deteriorates, when the position remains outside its intended range, or when expected fees no longer justify the price-divergence risk. For SOL-PIPPIN, compare those conditions with the current fee-only APR of 12.5% and Vol/TVL ratio of 0.13x.
Consider exiting when PIPPIN liquidity or trading activity deteriorates, when the position remains outside its intended range, or when expected fees no longer justify the price-divergence risk. For SOL-PIPPIN, compare those conditions with the current fee-only APR of 12.5% and Vol/TVL ratio of 0.13x.
It cannot be estimated reliably from the available data because seven-day impermanent loss is not reported and fee income changes with volume. The fee-only APR of 12.5% is an annualized snapshot, not a guaranteed recovery period; actual break-even depends on future volume, price divergence, and the time spent in range.
It cannot be estimated reliably from the available data because seven-day impermanent loss is not reported and fee income changes with volume. The fee-only APR of 12.5% is an annualized snapshot, not a guaranteed recovery period; actual break-even depends on future volume, price divergence, and the time spent in range.
