SOL-sSOLon Orca WhirlpoolWhirlpool
- Chain
- Solana
- TVL
- TVL $70.27K
- APR
- 0.0% APR
- 24h Volume
- $108.84 24h vol
- Pool address
- 8X5tAh7E…tD1T · observed 2026-09-03
new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score is 17/100, with Enter at 15/100, Hold at 20/100, and Exit at 80/100; the live verdict is EXIT, driven by ai_engine=hold. In practical terms, the score is above the stated entry threshold but below the hold threshold, so the model supports retaining an existing position more than initiating a new one. Its rank of #111 of 2506 orca-whirlpool pools places it relatively high within this pool set, but not at the top. A sustained TVL drain, lower volume, collapse in fee APR, or deteriorating SOL/SSOL market would weaken the assessment; persistent fee generation with stable liquidity would support it.
Computed 2026-09-03 22:39 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$70.27K
Total value locked
$108.84
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up0.0%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ 0.2%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Avoid
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Enter with a narrow range centered on the current SOL/SSOL price, and rebalance or exit at the first sustained out-of-range move rather than waiting for liquidity to return. Treat a material TVL drain or persistent volume deterioration as an exit trigger because the pool's return is fee-only.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 0.0% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 0.0% | — | — |
| Volume | $108.84 | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $0.01 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#2 of 12 SOL-sSOL pools
by AI Farmer Score
#407 of 14061 on orca-whirlpool
by AI Farmer Score
Top 4% of all Solana pools
overall rank #3210 of 105013
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the SOL-sSOL liquidity pool on Orca Whirlpool. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and SSOL into a shared trading pool so other users can swap between them. You receive a share of trading fees, currently represented by 0.0%, but your holdings can become less valuable than simply holding both assets if their prices move apart.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
The yield consists of 0.0% from trading fees and 0.0% from rewards, for a Total APR of 0.0%. Fee sustainability is 100%, so current compensation is entirely fee-driven rather than dependent on emissions. Reward dependency is not established, and no reward-expiry horizon is available; as a MEMECOIN pool, any future incentives should be treated as potentially subject to emission decay rather than as a durable return source.
shieldRisk Assessment
Seven-day impermanent-loss data is not reported, so recent price divergence cannot be quantified from this sheet. Seven-day tick-in-range history is also not reported, leaving actual range utilization unverified. The MEMECOIN classification adds exit-timing risk: liquidity conditions, trading activity, and any incentive program can deteriorate faster than in more established SOL pools, while the current fee-only APR may not offset adverse price movement.
tollSOL Context
SOL is the pool's base asset and has materially deeper liquidity across Solana markets than this pool alone, which generally supports easier external rebalancing or exit. SOL price movement against SSOL changes the inventory mix for a concentrated LP; a wider divergence increases exposure to impermanent loss even if swap volume remains steady.
tollsSOL Context
SSOL is a staked-SOL representation, so its intended economic relationship is to SOL rather than to an unrelated memecoin. Its external liquidity and any discount or premium to SOL still matter: a deviation can create inventory imbalance and raise exit slippage for this LP, even when the underlying staking relationship remains intact.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and SSOL into a shared trading pool so other users can swap between them. You receive a share of trading fees, currently represented by 0.0%, but your holdings can become less valuable than simply holding both assets if their prices move apart.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- 8X5tAh7EcafARDGhmLHxkiG5CousuB1yLtYsbuM9tD1T
- Protocol
- Orca Whirlpool
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- Whirlpool (CLMM)
- Token A
- SOL (So111111…)
- Token B
- sSOL (sSo14end…)
- Created
- 5/22/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
118%
APR
1%
APR
1%
APR
4%
By Protocol
hubAll orca-whirlpool poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The current reward-only APR is 0.0%, while fee-only APR is 0.0% and total APR is 0.0%. Emission decay therefore does not currently provide a meaningful yield cushion, but any future rewards should be treated as time-sensitive rather than permanent.
The current reward-only APR is 0.0%, while fee-only APR is 0.0% and total APR is 0.0%. Emission decay therefore does not currently provide a meaningful yield cushion, but any future rewards should be treated as time-sensitive rather than permanent.
There is currently no stated reward contribution beyond 0.0%, so expiry would not remove a current reward stream shown in this data. The remaining return would depend on trading fees, represented by 0.0%, which can fall if $109 or liquidity declines.
There is currently no stated reward contribution beyond 0.0%, so expiry would not remove a current reward stream shown in this data. The remaining return would depend on trading fees, represented by 0.0%, which can fall if $109 or liquidity declines.
This pool is classified as MEMECOIN, so liquidity and exit conditions may change quickly even though the pair is SOL and SSOL. With TVL of $70K and fee-funded APR of 0.0%, price divergence, out-of-range positioning, and a TVL drain can matter more than nominal yield.
This pool is classified as MEMECOIN, so liquidity and exit conditions may change quickly even though the pair is SOL and SSOL. With TVL of $70K and fee-funded APR of 0.0%, price divergence, out-of-range positioning, and a TVL drain can matter more than nominal yield.
For this pool, consider exiting after a sustained out-of-range move, a material TVL decline, or persistent weakness in $109 and 0.00x. Those conditions reduce fee production and can make the position harder to rebalance before market conditions worsen.
For this pool, consider exiting after a sustained out-of-range move, a material TVL decline, or persistent weakness in $109 and 0.00x. Those conditions reduce fee production and can make the position harder to rebalance before market conditions worsen.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because seven-day impermanent-loss history is not reported. If price divergence were ignored and conditions stayed constant, fee-only recovery would be approximately 1 divided by 0.0% years, before accounting for slippage, range changes, and future volume.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because seven-day impermanent-loss history is not reported. If price divergence were ignored and conditions stayed constant, fee-only recovery would be approximately 1 divided by 0.0% years, before accounting for slippage, range changes, and future volume.
