new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score is 5/100, with Enter 5/100, Hold 5/100, and Exit 95/100; the live verdict is EXIT and the stated verdict driver is ai_engine=hold. Its rank of #1846 of 18146 raydium-amm pools places it above most ranked pools by position, but the score should be read alongside $738, 0.00x, and the absence of a reward component rather than as a standalone quality signal. The assessment would weaken with a TVL drain, lower fee volume, or collapse in fee APR, and would improve only if liquidity and fee generation persist without a corresponding increase in price-divergence risk.
Computed 2026-10-12 11:49 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$737.99
Total value locked
$0.37
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up3.7%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ -26.2%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Avoid
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Enter only with a predefined exit trigger: reduce or close the position if fee generation weakens materially, TVL begins draining, or either token makes a sharp one-sided move without sufficient range coverage. Because tick history is unavailable, avoid assuming that a narrow concentrated range will remain active.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 3.7% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 3.6% | — | — |
| Volume | $0.37 | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $0.00 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 1 BOND-GP pools
by AI Farmer Score
#15879 of 91854 on raydium-amm
by AI Farmer Score
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the BOND-GP liquidity pool on Raydium AMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing BOND and GP into a shared trading pool. Traders pay fees that are distributed to liquidity providers, but the value of the two tokens can move differently, leaving you with more of the weaker token and possibly a lower result than simply holding both.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
Yield decomposes into fee APR of 3.6% and reward APR of 0.1%. Fee sustainability is 98%, meaning the current stated return comes from trading fees rather than farm rewards. Reward dependency is not established, so projected APR should be reassessed if fee volume or liquidity changes.
shieldRisk Assessment
A usable seven-day impermanent-loss reading and tick-in-range history are not available, so recent price-divergence damage and range exposure cannot be quantified from these metrics. As a MEMECOIN pool, BOND-GP is exposed to abrupt repricing, shallow-liquidity slippage, and adverse selection when one token moves sharply. Emission decay and exit timing still matter even though current yield is fee-funded: any future incentives may decline, while exiting after a large price move can crystallize impermanent loss.
tollBOND Context
BOND is one side of the BOND-GP pair, so LPs hold exposure to BOND price changes as well as the pool's trading fees. These metrics do not establish BOND's liquidity depth elsewhere; compare external venues before assuming that the position can be unwound without material slippage. A sharp BOND move relative to GP can increase inventory imbalance and impermanent loss.
tollGP Context
GP is the other side of the BOND-GP pair and contributes the same two-sided price exposure for an LP. Its liquidity depth elsewhere is not established by these pool metrics, so external market depth should be checked before sizing a position. GP price action that diverges from BOND can shift the LP toward the weaker-performing asset and reduce realized returns.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing BOND and GP into a shared trading pool. Traders pay fees that are distributed to liquidity providers, but the value of the two tokens can move differently, leaving you with more of the weaker token and possibly a lower result than simply holding both.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- 8fbAaFcbUDBzJh9qEr9Qubgxgk2jnqsB5a6JkuzyyARm
- Protocol
- Raydium AMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- AMM
- Token A
- BOND (8f9E3iCy…)
- Token B
- GP (HTmQz7My…)
- Created
- 9/21/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
9%
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
5%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-amm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The current yield is divided between fee APR 3.6% and reward APR 0.1%, so emission decay is not the present source of the quoted return. If rewards are added later, reduced, or removed, only the reward component would change directly; fee income would still depend on trading activity.
The current yield is divided between fee APR 3.6% and reward APR 0.1%, so emission decay is not the present source of the quoted return. If rewards are added later, reduced, or removed, only the reward component would change directly; fee income would still depend on trading activity.
The current reward component is 0.1%, while fee APR is 3.6% and fee sustainability is 98%. If incentives expire, the direct loss should be limited to any reward component, but the pool's total return can still fall if incentives had been supporting volume or liquidity.
The current reward component is 0.1%, while fee APR is 3.6% and fee sustainability is 98%. If incentives expire, the direct loss should be limited to any reward component, but the pool's total return can still fall if incentives had been supporting volume or liquidity.
Risk is elevated because the pool has TVL of $738, 24h volume of $0, and a volume-to-liquidity ratio of 0.00x. High turnover can produce fees, but MEMECOIN price shocks, shallow exit liquidity, and divergence between BOND and GP can create impermanent loss and slippage.
Risk is elevated because the pool has TVL of $738, 24h volume of $0, and a volume-to-liquidity ratio of 0.00x. High turnover can produce fees, but MEMECOIN price shocks, shallow exit liquidity, and divergence between BOND and GP can create impermanent loss and slippage.
Use a predefined trigger rather than waiting for a generalized market signal: exit or reduce exposure when TVL drains, fee APR 3.6% falls below your required compensation, or BOND and GP begin a sharp one-sided divergence. Lack of usable recent IL and range-history data makes reactive monitoring especially important.
Use a predefined trigger rather than waiting for a generalized market signal: exit or reduce exposure when TVL drains, fee APR 3.6% falls below your required compensation, or BOND and GP begin a sharp one-sided divergence. Lack of usable recent IL and range-history data makes reactive monitoring especially important.
It cannot be calculated reliably from the available data because recent impermanent loss and range history are not reported. Compare realized fee income, represented by 3.6%, against the eventual value gap from holding BOND and GP directly; the quoted APR is not a guaranteed break-even schedule.
It cannot be calculated reliably from the available data because recent impermanent loss and range history are not reported. Compare realized fee income, represented by 3.6%, against the eventual value gap from holding BOND and GP directly; the quoted APR is not a guaranteed break-even schedule.
