Wealthville Score
Verdict REDUCE · 44% confidence
new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score of 45/100 assigns Enter 40/100, Hold 51/100, and Exit 50/100, producing a live verdict of REDUCE. That assessment is consistent with the ai_engine exit signal, a CRITICAL scanner result, and a strong EXIT signal from at least two sources; the pool ranks #8320 of 8541 raydium-amm pools. The assessment would change only with sustained improvement in volume relative to TVL, materially deeper liquidity, or durable fee generation; a TVL drain or collapse in the already fee-dependent APR would reinforce the exit case.
Computed 2026-08-31 10:39 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$32.68K
Total value locked
$16.42
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up0.1%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ -0.8%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Proceed with Caution
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Enter only with a predefined exit trigger: if volume remains at $16 while TVL remains at $33K, or if the fee contribution falls from 0.1%, close or materially reduce the position rather than waiting for emissions.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 0.1% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 0.1% | — | — |
| Volume | $16.42 | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $0.04 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 1 SOL-SINK pools
by AI Farmer Score
#774 of 60178 on raydium-amm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 2% of all Solana pools
overall rank #1085 of 105013
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the SOL-SINK liquidity pool on Raydium AMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and SINK into a shared pool so other users can trade between them. You receive a portion of trading fees, but your holdings can shift toward the asset that performs worse, and the pool's thin activity may not produce meaningful income.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
The quoted APR decomposes into 0.1% from trading fees and 0.0% from rewards. 100% of yield comes from trading fees, so there is no current reward contribution supporting the APR. Reward duration is not established, and the MEMECOIN pool family makes emission changes and exit timing relevant if incentives are introduced later.
shieldRisk Assessment
Recent impermanent-loss history and tick-in-range coverage are unavailable, so neither price-divergence damage nor range efficiency can be quantified from the supplied data. SOL-SINK is a MEMECOIN pool: SINK liquidity and demand can contract quickly, while SOL/SINK price divergence can increase the LP's inventory exposure. Any emissions would be subject to decay or termination, making an early exit decision more important than relying on a static APR.
tollSOL Context
SOL is the established Solana asset in this pair and generally has substantially deeper liquidity elsewhere on the network than this pool provides. If SOL rises or falls materially relative to SINK, the pool rebalances the LP's holdings toward the weaker-performing asset, and the thin pool depth can make that effect more pronounced.
tollSINK Context
SINK is the memecoin-side asset and is likely to determine most of this pool's idiosyncratic liquidity and demand risk. A sharp SINK move, reduced trading interest, or fragmented liquidity elsewhere can increase inventory divergence and make exiting a position more difficult than exiting a SOL pair with deeper markets.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and SINK into a shared pool so other users can trade between them. You receive a portion of trading fees, but your holdings can shift toward the asset that performs worse, and the pool's thin activity may not produce meaningful income.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- 8hGz1U9sr5MoQ6DRo823WAg6v2CKGTi9X4JtDbmgj9Vi
- Protocol
- Raydium AMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- AMM
- Token A
- SOL (So111111…)
- Token B
- SINK (AMEdarx3…)
- Created
- 5/22/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
10%
APR
123%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-amm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The current reward-only component is 0.0%, so the quoted APR is not currently supported by emissions. If rewards are added and later decay, the APR would fall unless trading fees increase from 0.1%.
The current reward-only component is 0.0%, so the quoted APR is not currently supported by emissions. If rewards are added and later decay, the APR would fall unless trading fees increase from 0.1%.
Because the current reward-only APR is 0.0%, expiration would not remove an active reward contribution from the quoted return. After any incentive change, LP income would depend on fees, currently represented by 0.1%, and the pool's trading volume.
Because the current reward-only APR is 0.0%, expiration would not remove an active reward contribution from the quoted return. After any incentive change, LP income would depend on fees, currently represented by 0.1%, and the pool's trading volume.
Risk is high relative to a deeper SOL pair because SINK can lose demand or liquidity quickly, while SOL and SINK can move in opposite directions. This pool also has TVL of $33K, volume of $16, and no available recent impermanent-loss or range-occupancy history to quantify those risks.
Risk is high relative to a deeper SOL pair because SINK can lose demand or liquidity quickly, while SOL and SINK can move in opposite directions. This pool also has TVL of $33K, volume of $16, and no available recent impermanent-loss or range-occupancy history to quantify those risks.
For SOL-SINK, an exit is reasonable when activity remains at $16 against TVL of $33K, when fee income falls from 0.1%, or when SINK liquidity deteriorates. The current live verdict is REDUCE, with an Exit score of 50/100.
For SOL-SINK, an exit is reasonable when activity remains at $16 against TVL of $33K, when fee income falls from 0.1%, or when SINK liquidity deteriorates. The current live verdict is REDUCE, with an Exit score of 50/100.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history is unavailable and fee income changes with trading activity. At the current fee-only component of 0.1%, any recovery would also depend on future volume and the relative price paths of SOL and SINK.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history is unavailable and fee income changes with trading activity. At the current fee-only component of 0.1%, any recovery would also depend on future volume and the relative price paths of SOL and SINK.
