PONS-USDCon Raydium CLMMCLMMHigh Yield
- Chain
- Solana
- TVL
- TVL $55.32K
- APR
- 500.0% APR
- 24h Volume
- $79.97K 24h vol
- Fee tier
- 0.80% fee
- Pool address
- 8qNTTjfJ…CJcg · observed 2026-10-04
new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score of 52/100 with Enter 48/100, Hold 57/100, and Exit 25/100 supports the live HOLD verdict: the model is not identifying a clear new-entry advantage, but it is also not issuing an immediate exit signal. The ai_engine=hold driver is consistent with fee-based yield and active volume being offset by memecoin, range, and liquidity risks. The pool ranks #1067 of 8415 raydium-clmm pools, placing it in a monitored middle tier rather than among the strongest-ranked alternatives. A TVL drain, materially weaker volume, fee-yield collapse, or a sharp PONS repricing would change the assessment toward exit; durable liquidity and fee generation without worsening range risk could support a stronger assessment.
Computed 2026-10-04 04:21 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$55.32K
Total value locked
$79.97K
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up500.0%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ 257.3%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Wait & Monitor
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Enter with a range centered on the current PONS/USDC price and set a predefined rebalance or exit trigger for any sustained move outside that range; do not leave the position unattended through a sharp PONS repricing.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 500.0% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 444.3% | — | — |
| Volume | $79.97K | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $671.98 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 7 PONS-USDC pools
by AI Farmer Score
#222 of 18237 on raydium-clmm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 2% of all Solana pools
overall rank #1328 of 130194
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the PONS-USDC liquidity pool on Raydium CLMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing PONS and USDC into a trading pool so other users can swap between them, while you receive a share of trading fees. Your holdings can shift toward PONS or USDC as the price moves, and a sharp PONS move can leave you with less value than simply holding both assets.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
Total APR is 500.0%, composed of fee-only APR of 444.3% and reward-only APR of 55.7%. Fee sustainability is 89%, so current yield depends on trading activity rather than farm emissions. The reward schedule and remaining duration are not established, so any future emission change should be treated as an additional uncertainty rather than as a dependable source of return.
shieldRisk Assessment
A recent seven-day impermanent-loss reading is unavailable, and seven-day tick-in-range exposure is also not reported, so recent range efficiency cannot be quantified. As a MEMECOIN pool, PONS-USDC carries substantial token-specific volatility, liquidity discontinuity, and adverse-selection risk; emission decay can remove any supplemental incentive, while exit timing becomes more important if PONS falls sharply or liquidity thins.
tollPONS Context
PONS is the volatile asset in this pair and is the primary driver of impermanent loss when its price moves relative to USDC. Liquidity depth for PONS outside this pool is not provided, so a thinner external market could increase slippage and make exits more difficult. A large PONS move can push a concentrated-liquidity position out of range or leave it predominantly holding one asset.
tollUSDC Context
USDC is the quote and accounting asset, providing a relatively stable reference against which PONS performance is measured. Its role reduces directional exposure on one side of the position, but it does not remove PONS volatility, pool-specific liquidity risk, or the possibility of a stablecoin depeg. When PONS weakens, the position can accumulate PONS while its USDC value declines.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing PONS and USDC into a trading pool so other users can swap between them, while you receive a share of trading fees. Your holdings can shift toward PONS or USDC as the price moves, and a sharp PONS move can leave you with less value than simply holding both assets.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- 8qNTTjfJ5rfVDd5s8Y5H9qzxMRcYNwhE4EFFcqz4CJcg
- Protocol
- Raydium CLMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- Concentrated Liquidity (CLMM)
- Token A
- PONS (poNSfquK…)
- Token B
- USDC (EPjFWdd5…)
- Created
- 9/21/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
0%
APR
8%
APR
0%
APR
1%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-clmm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The current total APR is 500.0%, with fee-only APR of 444.3% and reward-only APR of 55.7%. Because 89% of yield comes from fees, emission decay would mainly reduce any supplemental reward component; the fee component still depends on trading volume.
The current total APR is 500.0%, with fee-only APR of 444.3% and reward-only APR of 55.7%. Because 89% of yield comes from fees, emission decay would mainly reduce any supplemental reward component; the fee component still depends on trading volume.
The pool would rely on trading fees, currently represented by 444.3%, rather than emissions represented by 55.7%. Since current reward contribution is zero, an incentive expiry would not remove the stated reward yield, but future changes to the farm schedule remain unquantified.
The pool would rely on trading fees, currently represented by 444.3%, rather than emissions represented by 55.7%. Since current reward contribution is zero, an incentive expiry would not remove the stated reward yield, but future changes to the farm schedule remain unquantified.
Risk is elevated because PONS can move sharply, liquidity can become one-sided, and concentrated liquidity can fall outside its active range. The reported 1.45x volume-to-liquidity ratio indicates meaningful trading activity relative to pool size, but it does not protect an LP from impermanent loss or an abrupt exit-liquidity shortage.
Risk is elevated because PONS can move sharply, liquidity can become one-sided, and concentrated liquidity can fall outside its active range. The reported 1.45x volume-to-liquidity ratio indicates meaningful trading activity relative to pool size, but it does not protect an LP from impermanent loss or an abrupt exit-liquidity shortage.
Use a predefined trigger such as a sustained move outside your chosen range, a material TVL drain, falling fee generation, or a PONS market-liquidity deterioration. For this pool, an exit is more defensible when fee income no longer compensates for the difficulty of managing concentrated exposure.
Use a predefined trigger such as a sustained move outside your chosen range, a material TVL drain, falling fee generation, or a PONS market-liquidity deterioration. For this pool, an exit is more defensible when fee income no longer compensates for the difficulty of managing concentrated exposure.
There is no reliable break-even estimate because recent impermanent-loss history and range data are unavailable. Break-even depends on future fee accrual at 444.3%, PONS price behavior, the position’s active range, and whether the reported 500.0% persists.
There is no reliable break-even estimate because recent impermanent-loss history and range data are unavailable. Break-even depends on future fee accrual at 444.3%, PONS price behavior, the position’s active range, and whether the reported 500.0% persists.
