new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
A Wealthville Score of 17/100 with Enter 15/100, Hold 20/100, and Exit 80/100 places this pool below the stated entry and hold thresholds and supports the live verdict EXIT. Its #284 of 889 ranking among meteora-damm-v2 pools, sharp recent TVL bleed, high risk score of 80/100, and weak fee yield indicate that current liquidity conditions do not compensate for memecoin and range risk. The assessment would improve if TVL stabilized, volume generated materially more fees, risk declined, and any incentive program demonstrated durable support; continued TVL drainage or a lower 1.4% would worsen it.
Computed 2026-09-11 09:41 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$164.31K
Total value locked
$1.83K
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up1.4%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ 0.3%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Avoid
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Enter only with a deliberately narrow range centered on the current SLERF-USDC price, and set an automated exit or rebalance when price leaves that range or when weekly TVL contraction continues; do not leave the position unattended while the pool remains fee-dependent and high risk.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 1.4% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 1.4% | — | — |
| Volume | $1.83K | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $3.67 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 2 SLERF-USDC pools
by AI Farmer Score
#429 of 1877 on meteora-damm-v2
by AI Farmer Score
Top 8% of all Solana pools
overall rank #8688 of 110016
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the SLERF-USDC liquidity pool on Meteora DAMM v2. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing both SLERF and USDC into a shared pool so other people can trade between them. You receive trading fees, currently represented by 1.4% total APR, but a large SLERF price move can leave you with a less favorable mix of the two assets.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
Yield decomposes into 1.4% fee APR and 0.0% reward APR, with 99% of the displayed yield coming from trading fees. Reward dependency and the remaining duration of any incentive program are not established, so the current return should be evaluated as fee-dependent rather than as an emission-funded strategy. If trading activity remains subdued, 1.4% can fall with fee generation.
shieldRisk Assessment
Seven-day impermanent-loss data is not reported, and the pool's recent tick-in-range history is unavailable, so realized price exposure and range utilization cannot be quantified from the supplied record. As a MEMECOIN pool, SLERF price moves can rapidly create one-sided inventory and make fee income insufficient to offset divergence from the USDC leg. Emission decay is also relevant to exit timing: any future incentive support could diminish, while the current reward component is 0.0%; the displayed risk score is 80/100.
tollSLERF Context
SLERF is the volatile memecoin leg, so providing liquidity exchanges exposure to SLERF price movements for a mixed SLERF-USDC position rather than simply holding SLERF. Liquidity depth for SLERF elsewhere is not established by the supplied pool metrics; thin external liquidity would increase the effect of price gaps and make rebalancing more costly. A sharp SLERF move can leave the LP holding more of the weaker-performing asset while fees remain dependent on actual trading volume.
tollUSDC Context
USDC is the intended stable-value leg and provides the quote asset against which SLERF is priced. Its broader liquidity depth is not quantified here, so this pool should not be assumed to have the same execution quality as deeper USDC markets. When SLERF falls, the position generally accumulates more SLERF; when SLERF rises, it generally gives up some SLERF exposure in exchange for USDC.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing both SLERF and USDC into a shared pool so other people can trade between them. You receive trading fees, currently represented by 1.4% total APR, but a large SLERF price move can leave you with a less favorable mix of the two assets.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- 8yswq8vqEDeTrN2Ez1Bdq2hRekzvFZgMxrdfUKVaNBtQ
- Protocol
- Meteora DAMM v2
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- AMM
- Token A
- SLERF (9999FVbj…)
- Token B
- USDC (EPjFWdd5…)
- Created
- 7/29/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
0%
APR
6%
APR
500%
APR
8%
By Protocol
hubAll meteora-damm-v2 poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The displayed reward component is 0.0%, so current APR is not visibly supported by emissions; 1.4% comes from fees and 99% of yield is fee-funded. If incentives are added later, emission decay would reduce that reward component over time unless trading fees increase.
The displayed reward component is 0.0%, so current APR is not visibly supported by emissions; 1.4% comes from fees and 99% of yield is fee-funded. If incentives are added later, emission decay would reduce that reward component over time unless trading fees increase.
Because the displayed reward APR is 0.0%, the current quoted 1.4% is already fee-dependent rather than visibly dependent on farm rewards. If an unreported incentive exists and expires, only trading-fee income would remain, making volume and liquidity retention the main determinants of returns.
Because the displayed reward APR is 0.0%, the current quoted 1.4% is already fee-dependent rather than visibly dependent on farm rewards. If an unreported incentive exists and expires, only trading-fee income would remain, making volume and liquidity retention the main determinants of returns.
Risk is elevated: the pool has a risk score of 80/100, and SLERF can move sharply against USDC, creating one-sided inventory and potential impermanent loss. The absence of reported recent impermanent-loss and tick-range history makes the realized exposure harder to assess.
Risk is elevated: the pool has a risk score of 80/100, and SLERF can move sharply against USDC, creating one-sided inventory and potential impermanent loss. The absence of reported recent impermanent-loss and tick-range history makes the realized exposure harder to assess.
For this pool, an exit is warranted if TVL continues to contract, fee generation weakens from 1.4%, price leaves your selected range, or the pool's risk assessment worsens. A sustained decline in liquidity is especially relevant because the current return is entirely fee-funded.
For this pool, an exit is warranted if TVL continues to contract, fee generation weakens from 1.4%, price leaves your selected range, or the pool's risk assessment worsens. A sustained decline in liquidity is especially relevant because the current return is entirely fee-funded.
There is no reliable break-even estimate because recent impermanent-loss history is unavailable and the pool's 0.01x activity is low relative to its liquidity base. With 1.4% total APR and 99% fee-funded yield, recovery depends on sustained volume and SLERF price behavior rather than on a fixed timetable.
There is no reliable break-even estimate because recent impermanent-loss history is unavailable and the pool's 0.01x activity is low relative to its liquidity base. With 1.4% total APR and 99% fee-funded yield, recovery depends on sustained volume and SLERF price behavior rather than on a fixed timetable.
