new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score of 49/100 places this pool in a balanced rather than decisive category: Enter is 45/100, Hold is 55/100, and Exit is 27/100, with the live verdict at HOLD. The ai_engine=hold driver is consistent with a fee-supported pool that has meaningful activity but unresolved memecoin, range, and lifecycle data. Its rank of #409 of 8541 raydium-amm pools indicates a relatively strong position within the screened set, not a guarantee of capital preservation or persistent fees. The assessment would weaken if TVL drains, volume contracts, fee APR collapses, CHILLGUY liquidity becomes impaired, or new data shows sustained adverse inventory divergence; stronger and persistent activity with stable liquidity would support maintaining the current assessment.
Computed 2026-09-07 02:29 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$1.56M
Total value locked
$2.05M
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up243.4%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ 31.8%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Wait & Monitor
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Set a review trigger if 24-hour volume falls below half of $2.0M for three consecutive days, and reduce or exit the position if that condition coincides with a material TVL decline from $1.6M; do not wait for the displayed APR to update after liquidity and activity have already deteriorated.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 243.4% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 123.6% | — | — |
| Volume | $2.05M | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $5.12K | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 13 SOL-CHILLGUY pools
by AI Farmer Score
#700 of 61707 on raydium-amm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 2% of all Solana pools
overall rank #1470 of 107256
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the SOL-CHILLGUY liquidity pool on Raydium AMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and CHILLGUY into a shared pool so traders can swap between them, while you receive part of the trading fees. Your token amounts can change as prices move, and a sharp CHILLGUY move can leave you with less favorable assets even when the displayed fee income is high.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
The total APR of 243.4% decomposes into 123.6% from trading fees and 119.9% from rewards. 51% of the reported yield comes from trading fees, so current returns depend on continued swap activity rather than active farm emissions. Reward dependency is not established, and no reward-expiry timeline should be assumed from the current APR.
shieldRisk Assessment
A seven-day impermanent-loss reading and tick-in-range reading are not currently available, so recent divergence and range utilization cannot be quantified from these metrics. As a MEMECOIN pool, SOL-CHILLGUY carries high sensitivity to CHILLGUY liquidity, sentiment, and abrupt price gaps; emission decay is not the present source of yield, but exit timing can still determine whether accumulated fees offset adverse inventory changes. LPs should also account for thinner exit liquidity in CHILLGUY than in SOL.
tollSOL Context
SOL is the relatively liquid, established side of this pair and has deeper liquidity across Solana venues than CHILLGUY. For this LP, a SOL price move changes the pool's inventory mix against CHILLGUY; a large relative move can create impermanent loss even when fee income remains strong. SOL's broader liquidity may make the SOL leg easier to hedge or exit, but it does not remove pair-level risk.
tollCHILLGUY Context
CHILLGUY is the memecoin leg and is likely to contribute most of the pair's liquidity and price-discovery risk. Its liquidity is more concentrated and sentiment-sensitive than SOL's, so sharp CHILLGUY moves can alter the LP's token balances and widen practical exit costs. A collapse in CHILLGUY trading activity would also reduce the fee base supporting 123.6%.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and CHILLGUY into a shared pool so traders can swap between them, while you receive part of the trading fees. Your token amounts can change as prices move, and a sharp CHILLGUY move can leave you with less favorable assets even when the displayed fee income is high.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- 93tjgwff5Ac5ThyMi8C4WejVVQq4tuMeMuYW1LEYZ7bu
- Protocol
- Raydium AMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- AMM
- Token A
- SOL (So111111…)
- Token B
- CHILLGUY (Df6yfrKC…)
- Created
- 4/22/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
48%
APR
126%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-amm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
Current rewards contribute 119.9%, while fees contribute 123.6% and account for 51% of reported yield. Emission decay therefore has little direct effect on the current displayed APR, but any future change in incentives would not compensate for weaker trading activity.
Current rewards contribute 119.9%, while fees contribute 123.6% and account for 51% of reported yield. Emission decay therefore has little direct effect on the current displayed APR, but any future change in incentives would not compensate for weaker trading activity.
The current reward-only APR is 119.9%, so the pool is already reliant on trading fees rather than active emissions. If incentives expire or remain absent, the relevant support for returns is 123.6%, which will vary with volume and liquidity.
The current reward-only APR is 119.9%, so the pool is already reliant on trading fees rather than active emissions. If incentives expire or remain absent, the relevant support for returns is 123.6%, which will vary with volume and liquidity.
The pool has $1.6M of liquidity and $2.0M in 24-hour volume, but CHILLGUY can experience sharper price and liquidity changes than SOL. The main risks are impermanent loss, sudden reduction in exit liquidity, and fee compression if trading activity falls from its current 1.31x volume-to-TVL level.
The pool has $1.6M of liquidity and $2.0M in 24-hour volume, but CHILLGUY can experience sharper price and liquidity changes than SOL. The main risks are impermanent loss, sudden reduction in exit liquidity, and fee compression if trading activity falls from its current 1.31x volume-to-TVL level.
For SOL-CHILLGUY, consider reducing exposure when volume stays below half of $2.0M, TVL materially declines from $1.6M, or CHILLGUY liquidity becomes difficult to exit. A falling fee APR from 123.6% is an additional signal that the pool's compensation may no longer justify memecoin and inventory risk.
For SOL-CHILLGUY, consider reducing exposure when volume stays below half of $2.0M, TVL materially declines from $1.6M, or CHILLGUY liquidity becomes difficult to exit. A falling fee APR from 123.6% is an additional signal that the pool's compensation may no longer justify memecoin and inventory risk.
There is no defensible fixed break-even period because recent seven-day impermanent loss data is unavailable and both price divergence and volume can change quickly. In principle, cumulative fees at 123.6% must exceed the position's impermanent loss and other costs, but the headline 243.4% should not be treated as a guaranteed recovery schedule.
There is no defensible fixed break-even period because recent seven-day impermanent loss data is unavailable and both price divergence and volume can change quickly. In principle, cumulative fees at 123.6% must exceed the position's impermanent loss and other costs, but the headline 243.4% should not be treated as a guaranteed recovery schedule.
