RAY-RAYCATon Raydium CLMMCLMMHigh Yield
- Chain
- Solana
- TVL
- TVL $139.74K
- APR
- 50.8% APR
- 24h Volume
- $15.11K 24h vol
- Fee tier
- 1.00% fee
- Pool address
- 987VwvJZ…jPjD · observed 2026-10-24
Wealthville Score
Verdict AVOID · 59% confidence
new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score is 19/100, with Enter at 10/100, Hold at 30/100, and Exit at 60/100; the live verdict is AVOID. The ai_engine=hold driver places this pool in a monitoring posture rather than treating the fee APR as sufficient on its own. Its rank is #1641 of 9963 raydium-clmm pools, which indicates a middling position within the tracked set rather than a leading one. A TVL drain, sustained volume contraction, fee-yield collapse, worsening execution conditions, or evidence that price remains outside usable ranges would weaken the assessment; durable fee volume and stable liquidity would support it.
Computed 2026-10-24 07:07 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$139.74K
Total value locked
$15.11K
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up50.8%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ -33.4%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Avoid
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Use a monitored range around the current RAY/RAYCAT price and rebalance when the position leaves that range; withdraw rather than widen the range automatically if volume-to-TVL falls materially below 0.11x or if fee accrual no longer compensates for the memecoin exposure.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 50.8% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 41.1% | — | — |
| Volume | $15.11K | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $152.05 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 2 RAY-RAYCAT pools
by AI Farmer Score
#1049 of 19497 on raydium-clmm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 6% of all Solana pools
overall rank #7433 of 148664
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the RAY-RAYCAT liquidity pool on Raydium CLMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing RAY and RAYCAT into a price range so other users can trade between them. You receive trading fees, but large price moves can leave you holding more of the weaker token and can reduce the value of your deposit compared with simply holding both tokens.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
The quoted yield decomposes into 41.1% fee APR and 9.7% reward APR. 81% of yield comes from trading fees, so current returns depend on continued swap activity rather than farm emissions. Reward dependency is not established, and no current reward component is contributing to the displayed APR.
shieldRisk Assessment
A seven-day impermanent-loss measurement is not available, and recent tick-in-range exposure is not reported, so the realized relationship between fees and price divergence cannot be verified from these metrics. As a MEMECOIN pool, RAY-RAYCAT can experience abrupt price moves, shallow exit liquidity, and rapid changes in the relative price of the two assets. If incentives are introduced later, emission decay can reduce APR; exit timing should be based on fee generation, range status, and liquidity conditions rather than headline yield alone.
tollRAY Context
RAY is one side of the pool and serves as the established Solana ecosystem asset against which RAYCAT is priced here. Liquidity depth for RAY elsewhere is not quantified by these pool metrics, so this sheet does not assess its broader execution quality. A sharp RAY move relative to RAYCAT can shift the position toward one asset and create impermanent loss even when fees continue accruing.
tollRAYCAT Context
RAYCAT is the memecoin side of the pair and is likely to drive much of the pool's relative-price volatility. Its liquidity depth elsewhere is not established here, so exits may be more sensitive to market depth than the pool's TVL alone suggests. A rapid RAYCAT repricing can push a concentrated position out of range or leave the LP holding more RAYCAT after a decline.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing RAY and RAYCAT into a price range so other users can trade between them. You receive trading fees, but large price moves can leave you holding more of the weaker token and can reduce the value of your deposit compared with simply holding both tokens.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- 987VwvJZ5FRjWCY9ZwC2tRUGL8FbMT1aF4pUrT7XjPjD
- Protocol
- Raydium CLMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- Concentrated Liquidity (CLMM)
- Token A
- RAY (4k3Dyjzv…)
- Token B
- RAYCAT (CFNRDaxF…)
- Created
- 8/14/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
1%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-clmm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
Current APR is 50.8%, composed of 41.1% in fees and 9.7% in rewards, so present emission decay is not the source of the displayed yield. If rewards are added later, their decay could reduce the reward component without changing fee revenue.
Current APR is 50.8%, composed of 41.1% in fees and 9.7% in rewards, so present emission decay is not the source of the displayed yield. If rewards are added later, their decay could reduce the reward component without changing fee revenue.
The pool would retain only the trading-fee component, currently represented by 41.1%, while the reward component represented by 9.7% would fall away. Because current yield is entirely fee-funded, the main question is whether trading volume can sustain fees after any incentive change.
The pool would retain only the trading-fee component, currently represented by 41.1%, while the reward component represented by 9.7% would fall away. Because current yield is entirely fee-funded, the main question is whether trading volume can sustain fees after any incentive change.
Risk is elevated by RAYCAT's memecoin classification, concentrated liquidity, and uncertain exit depth. The pool has $140K TVL, $15K in 24h volume, and a 0.11x volume-to-TVL ratio, but a recent impermanent-loss reading is not available.
Risk is elevated by RAYCAT's memecoin classification, concentrated liquidity, and uncertain exit depth. The pool has $140K TVL, $15K in 24h volume, and a 0.11x volume-to-TVL ratio, but a recent impermanent-loss reading is not available.
Consider exiting when the position leaves its selected range, when fee income falls materially from 41.1%, or when liquidity and volume deteriorate from $140K and $15K. Do not wait for reward emissions to justify staying if they are not contributing to current APR.
Consider exiting when the position leaves its selected range, when fee income falls materially from 41.1%, or when liquidity and volume deteriorate from $140K and $15K. Do not wait for reward emissions to justify staying if they are not contributing to current APR.
There is no reliable break-even estimate because recent impermanent loss is not measured and future fee volume is variable. At the current structure, recovery depends on 41.1% fee income continuing long enough to offset the position's price divergence and rebalancing costs.
There is no reliable break-even estimate because recent impermanent loss is not measured and future fee volume is variable. At the current structure, recovery depends on 41.1% fee income continuing long enough to offset the position's price divergence and rebalancing costs.
