new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score of 17/100 places this pool near the Enter threshold of 15/100 but below the Hold score of 20/100, while the Exit score is 80/100 and the live verdict is EXIT. That result is consistent with the ai_engine=hold output being outweighed by a CRITICAL scanner and an unopposed strong EXIT signal. Its rank of #1710 of 24532 raydium-amm pools indicates a relatively weak position in the tracked universe. The assessment could change if TVL stabilizes or grows, trading volume rises enough to support fee income, the scanner leaves CRITICAL status, or persistent liquidity and price data demonstrate healthier conditions; a TVL drain or further yield collapse would reinforce it.
Computed 2026-11-09 16:23 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$38.50K
Total value locked
$6.93
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up0.0%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ -82.2%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Avoid
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Treat the scanner's CRITICAL, unopposed EXIT signal as the operating trigger: do not widen exposure while it persists, and exit if fee income does not improve alongside a sustained rise in volume relative to TVL. Because recent range data is unavailable, avoid relying on a narrow tick range without monitoring it actively.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 0.0% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 0.0% | — | — |
| Volume | $6.93 | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $0.02 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 2 SOL-scihub pools
by AI Farmer Score
#14092 of 99294 on raydium-amm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 13% of all Solana pools
overall rank #20374 of 157883
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the SOL-scihub liquidity pool on Raydium AMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and SCIHUB into a shared trading pool so other users can swap between them. You receive a portion of trading fees, but the value of your deposit can differ from simply holding the two tokens, especially if SCIHUB moves sharply or the pool becomes harder to trade.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
Yield decomposes into fee-only APR of 0.0% and reward-only APR of 0.0%. 100% of the yield is sourced from trading fees, so the return depends on continued swap activity rather than emissions. Reward duration is not established, making emission-decay timing and post-incentive APR behavior uncertain.
shieldRisk Assessment
Recent seven-day impermanent-loss history is unavailable, and recent tick-in-range exposure is also unreported, so neither realized loss nor range utilization can be assessed from those metrics. As a MEMECOIN pool, SOL-SCIHUB carries token-specific volatility, liquidity-withdrawal, and correlation risk; any emissions can decay or end, making exit timing important even when fee income persists.
tollSOL Context
SOL is the liquid base asset in this pair and has substantially deeper liquidity across Solana venues than this pool. SOL price movements against SCIHUB determine the pool's inventory mix and can create impermanent loss relative to simply holding both assets, while SOL's broader liquidity may make rebalancing or exiting easier than for SCIHUB.
tollscihub Context
SCIHUB is the memecoin-side asset, so its liquidity and price discovery are more dependent on this pool and other limited venues than SOL's. A sharp SCIHUB move, weak external liquidity, or falling demand can increase inventory imbalance, worsen execution, and leave LP fees insufficient to compensate for adverse price divergence.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and SCIHUB into a shared trading pool so other users can swap between them. You receive a portion of trading fees, but the value of your deposit can differ from simply holding the two tokens, especially if SCIHUB moves sharply or the pool becomes harder to trade.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- 9BW41PS2P21F2SUTsfmP4rN6u1pGzcRc9541S33NwBwJ
- Protocol
- Raydium AMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- AMM
- Token A
- SOL (So111111…)
- Token B
- scihub (GxdTh6ud…)
- Created
- 4/22/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
19%
APR
0%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-amm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The reward-only APR is 0.0%, while fee-only APR is 0.0% and total APR is 0.0%. Because the reward schedule is not established, any emissions could decay without warning; fee income would then be the remaining yield source.
The reward-only APR is 0.0%, while fee-only APR is 0.0% and total APR is 0.0%. Because the reward schedule is not established, any emissions could decay without warning; fee income would then be the remaining yield source.
The reward component would fall away, leaving trading fees as the basis for LP returns. Since 100% already comes from fees and reward duration is not established, the post-incentive APR could be close to 0.0% unless trading volume changes.
The reward component would fall away, leaving trading fees as the basis for LP returns. Since 100% already comes from fees and reward duration is not established, the post-incentive APR could be close to 0.0% unless trading volume changes.
Risk is high because SCIHUB can move sharply, external liquidity may be limited, and the pool's trading activity is small relative to its liquidity at 0.00x. Impermanent-loss history and tick-range exposure are not currently reported, so those risks cannot be quantified from the available data.
Risk is high because SCIHUB can move sharply, external liquidity may be limited, and the pool's trading activity is small relative to its liquidity at 0.00x. Impermanent-loss history and tick-range exposure are not currently reported, so those risks cannot be quantified from the available data.
For this pool, the CRITICAL scanner and unopposed EXIT signal are concrete reasons to avoid waiting for emissions to improve. An LP should reassess or exit if liquidity drains, volume fails to support 0.0%, or the scanner remains critical while fee income weakens.
For this pool, the CRITICAL scanner and unopposed EXIT signal are concrete reasons to avoid waiting for emissions to improve. An LP should reassess or exit if liquidity drains, volume fails to support 0.0%, or the scanner remains critical while fee income weakens.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history is unavailable and fee production depends on variable trading volume. The relevant comparison is whether cumulative fees at 0.0% can offset the position's realized price divergence before exit.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history is unavailable and fee production depends on variable trading volume. The relevant comparison is whether cumulative fees at 0.0% can offset the position's realized price divergence before exit.
