new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score is 17/100, with Enter at 15/100, Hold at 20/100, and Exit at 80/100. The live verdict is EXIT, driven by ai_engine=hold, and the pool ranks #1108 of 8541 raydium-amm pools. In practical terms, the assessment supports monitoring an existing position more than treating the pool as a strong new allocation: the fee-funded structure is clear, but 0.00x indicates limited turnover relative to liquidity and the pool has no established reward cushion. A material TVL drain, further volume deterioration, fee-APR collapse, or a severe MAIL repricing would weaken the assessment; sustained fee generation and deeper liquidity would improve it.
Computed 2026-09-21 11:25 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$62.89K
Total value locked
$108.62
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up0.0%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ -0.6%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Avoid
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Because this is a raydium-amm pool rather than a concentrated-liquidity position, set a predefined withdrawal rule instead of managing ticks: review the position when TVL falls materially from $63K, when fee income no longer justifies MAIL exposure, or when EXIT changes from HOLD to Exit.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 0.0% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 0.0% | — | — |
| Volume | $108.62 | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $0.27 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 4 SOL-Mail pools
by AI Farmer Score
#4903 of 71780 on raydium-amm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 8% of all Solana pools
overall rank #9396 of 122041
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the SOL-Mail liquidity pool on Raydium AMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and MAIL into a shared pool used by traders. You receive part of the trading fees, but your final holdings can shift toward whichever token performs worse, and a memecoin price drop can reduce the value of the position.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
The total APR is 0.0%, decomposed into 0.0% from trading fees and 0.0% from rewards. Fee sustainability is 100%, meaning the displayed yield is currently supported by fees rather than farm emissions. Reward dependency is not established, and no reliable reward-duration estimate is available; any future emission changes would therefore need to be assessed separately from the current fee income.
shieldRisk Assessment
Seven-day impermanent-loss history and tick-in-range history are unavailable, so recent loss behavior and range exposure cannot be quantified from the supplied data. As a MEMECOIN pool, SOL-MAIL is exposed to sharp, asymmetric price moves in MAIL and to liquidity withdrawals during sentiment reversals. Emission decay is not currently the main risk because the displayed reward component is 0.0%, but exit timing still matters: incentives, if introduced, can end before trading fees compensate for adverse price divergence.
tollSOL Context
SOL is the larger and more liquid asset in this pair, with substantially deeper liquidity elsewhere on Solana than this pool's $63K. A strong SOL move against MAIL changes the pool's inventory through arbitrage and can leave an LP holding more of the weaker-performing asset, while SOL's broader liquidity may make its price less sensitive to this pool's limited volume.
tollMail Context
MAIL is the memecoin-side asset, so its price and liquidity profile are likely to dominate the pair's idiosyncratic risk. Liquidity outside SOL-MAIL should not be assumed to match SOL's depth; a sharp MAIL repricing or thin exit liquidity can increase inventory imbalance and make timely withdrawal more important.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and MAIL into a shared pool used by traders. You receive part of the trading fees, but your final holdings can shift toward whichever token performs worse, and a memecoin price drop can reduce the value of the position.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- 9DYGj7g2b5fipk9wGsUhxdv5zpfTsoGzCiS29vH8Cfrs
- Protocol
- Raydium AMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- AMM
- Token A
- SOL (So111111…)
- Token B
- Mail (C8cNX2D1…)
- Created
- 4/22/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
384%
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
18%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-amm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The pool currently shows 0.0% in reward APR, so emission decay is not contributing a recorded reward reduction to the displayed 0.0%. Current yield depends on 0.0% in trading fees; future emissions would add a separate, potentially declining component.
The pool currently shows 0.0% in reward APR, so emission decay is not contributing a recorded reward reduction to the displayed 0.0%. Current yield depends on 0.0% in trading fees; future emissions would add a separate, potentially declining component.
Because the current reward component is 0.0%, expiration of any unreported incentives would not remove a recorded reward contribution from the present APR. The remaining yield would be the fee component, 0.0%, and its durability would depend on trading volume rather than emissions.
Because the current reward component is 0.0%, expiration of any unreported incentives would not remove a recorded reward contribution from the present APR. The remaining yield would be the fee component, 0.0%, and its durability would depend on trading volume rather than emissions.
Risk is elevated because MAIL can move sharply and may have less external liquidity than SOL. This pool has TVL of $63K and a Vol/TVL ratio of 0.00x; seven-day impermanent-loss history is unavailable, so recent loss behavior cannot be measured.
Risk is elevated because MAIL can move sharply and may have less external liquidity than SOL. This pool has TVL of $63K and a Vol/TVL ratio of 0.00x; seven-day impermanent-loss history is unavailable, so recent loss behavior cannot be measured.
Use predetermined signals rather than waiting for a large price move: a material decline from $63K, weakening fee income, a change in EXIT from HOLD to Exit, or a sharp deterioration in MAIL liquidity are reasonable exit triggers. If incentives are later added, reassess before their stated end date rather than assuming the fee APR will replace them.
Use predetermined signals rather than waiting for a large price move: a material decline from $63K, weakening fee income, a change in EXIT from HOLD to Exit, or a sharp deterioration in MAIL liquidity are reasonable exit triggers. If incentives are later added, reassess before their stated end date rather than assuming the fee APR will replace them.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because seven-day impermanent-loss history is unavailable and future trading volume is uncertain. At 0.0%, gross fee recovery is approximately the inverse of that annualized rate before price divergence, withdrawal costs, and changing volume are considered.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because seven-day impermanent-loss history is unavailable and future trading volume is uncertain. At 0.0%, gross fee recovery is approximately the inverse of that annualized rate before price divergence, withdrawal costs, and changing volume are considered.
