WealthVille
ETH
E
UNI
U

ETH-UNIon Raydium CLMMCLMMHigh Yield

Chain
Solana
TVL
TVL $30.07K
APR
58.9% APR
24h Volume
$1.71K 24h vol
Fee tier
4.00% fee
Pool address
9Dy1NmyCLxza · observed 2026-09-23
53D · Weak

Wealthville Score

Verdict HOLD · 63% confidence

ai_engine=hold
How this score works →
Enter51

new capital

Hold56

keep position

Exit28

urgency to leave

The Wealthville Score is 53/100, with Enter at 51/100, Hold at 56/100, and Exit at 28/100; the live verdict is HOLD, driven by ai_engine=hold. Its #305-of-8415 rank among raydium-clmm pools places it above most ranked pools, but that position does not remove the pool's small liquidity base or memecoin-family risk. The assessment would change if TVL drained, trading volume weakened enough to reduce fee APR, or the fee-funded yield collapsed; sustained volume and deeper liquidity would support a stronger assessment.

Computed 2026-09-23 01:12 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.

Liquidityhelp

lock

$30.07K

Total value locked

$1.71K

24h volume

×0.1 turnover

Yieldhelp

trending_up

58.9%

advertised APR

Fee yield, annualized

-24.7%

adjusted · net of IL (est.)

4.00% fee

My Position

account_balance_wallet
Live DataUpdated 44m agoTVL 1.3%
schedule

AI Verdict

Wait & Monitor

WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.

check_circleStrong stable income score: 100/100
check_circleFee-driven yield: 79% of APR from trading fees
warningElevated risk score: 92/100
tips_and_updates

Use a narrower, actively monitored range and rebalance when ETH/UNI moves far enough that either asset dominates the position; exit if pool TVL drains materially or fee generation no longer supports the position after accounting for the cost of rebalancing.

syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background

table_chart

Performance Breakdown

Metric24h / Day7d / Week30d / Month
Total APR58.9%
Fee APR46.3%
Volume$1.71K
Fees Earned$68.51

Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.

analytics

Efficiency Metrics

Computed

Deterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.

Sustainable Gross APY
75.3%(trailing 7d fees)
Impermanent-Loss Drag
−100.0%(realized, 30d annualized)
Adjusted Net APY (est.)
-24.7%(drags exceed yield)
Volume / TVL Ratio (24h)
0.06x
Fee Yield per $1 TVL / Day
$0.0023
Fee APR Sustainability
79% from trading fees(sustainable)
leaderboard

Pool Rankings

compare_arrows

#1 of 1 ETH-UNI pools

by AI Farmer Score

hub

#1 of 17344 on raydium-clmm

by AI Farmer Score

leaderboard

Top 1% of all Solana pools

overall rank #1 of 122041

lightbulb

How This Pool Works

Beginner Friendly

This page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the ETH-UNI liquidity pool on Raydium CLMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.

Providing liquidity here means depositing ETH and UNI into a shared trading pool so other users can swap between them. You receive trading fees, but your holdings can become more concentrated in one token when ETH and UNI move differently, and the pool's small size can make exits more difficult.

description

Pool Analysis

trending_upYield Source Breakdown

Yield decomposes into 46.3% from trading fees and 12.5% from rewards, with 79%. Because the pool currently has no reward contribution, emission decay is not the present source of APR compression; any future incentive program would be time-bound and should be evaluated by its remaining duration rather than its headline rate.

shieldRisk Assessment

Seven-day impermanent-loss history and tick-in-range history are unavailable, so recent price divergence and range utilization cannot be quantified from these metrics. As a MEMECOIN-family pool, the main additional risk is abrupt liquidity withdrawal and rapid price repricing; exit timing matters because a thinner pool can lose fee generation and become harder to unwind before market interest fades. Any future emissions would also decay or expire, reducing the reason to remain if trading fees do not replace them.

tollETH Context

ETH is the larger and more broadly liquid asset in this pair, with liquidity available across other Solana venues and major markets. ETH price movement relative to UNI changes the pool's inventory mix and can create impermanent loss for an LP even when the position earns fees.

tollUNI Context

UNI is a governance token with materially narrower liquidity than ETH in most markets, so its price can react more sharply to changes in demand and market depth. UNI strength or weakness against ETH shifts the position toward one asset and may increase the cost of remaining in range during a fast move.

lightbulbSimple Explanation

Providing liquidity here means depositing ETH and UNI into a shared trading pool so other users can swap between them. You receive trading fees, but your holdings can become more concentrated in one token when ETH and UNI move differently, and the pool's small size can make exits more difficult.

token

Token Details

ETH
ETHEther (Portal)Solana
Explorer

Ether (Portal) (ETH) — one of the two assets paired in this liquidity pool.

UNI
UNIUniswap (Wormhole)Solana
Explorer

Uniswap (Wormhole) (UNI) — one of the two assets paired in this liquidity pool.

info

Pool Details

Pool Address
9Dy1NmyCYodZMzYiVHkvX5g8NsWq18eQkknhBaWNLxza
Protocol
Raydium CLMM
Chain
solana
Fee Tier
Pool Type
Concentrated Liquidity (CLMM)
Token A
ETH (7vfCXTUX…)
Token B
UNI (8FU95xFJ…)
Created
4/22/2026
lock

Non-Custodial

Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.

source

Verified Data Sources

Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield

psychology

AI-Powered Analysis

Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data

⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.

quiz

Frequently Asked Questions

The current APR is split between 46.3% in fees and 12.5% in rewards, so current yield does not depend on emissions. If incentives are introduced, emission decay would lower the reward portion while fee income would still depend on trading volume.

The current APR is split between 46.3% in fees and 12.5% in rewards, so current yield does not depend on emissions. If incentives are introduced, emission decay would lower the reward portion while fee income would still depend on trading volume.

There is currently no reward component in the quoted APR: 12.5%. If a future incentive program expires, only the fee-funded portion, 46.3%, would remain unless trading activity changes.

There is currently no reward component in the quoted APR: 12.5%. If a future incentive program expires, only the fee-funded portion, 46.3%, would remain unless trading activity changes.

Risk is elevated by the MEMECOIN classification, the pool's small liquidity base of $30K, and possible rapid changes in ETH-UNI prices. Fees can offset some losses, but they do not prevent impermanent loss or make a thin pool easy to exit.

Risk is elevated by the MEMECOIN classification, the pool's small liquidity base of $30K, and possible rapid changes in ETH-UNI prices. Fees can offset some losses, but they do not prevent impermanent loss or make a thin pool easy to exit.

For this pool, consider exiting when TVL drains, fee generation falls materially, ETH or UNI leaves the intended range, or the market thesis for the memecoin-family pool weakens. A reward expiry would also remove any incentive to tolerate the position if fee income is insufficient.

For this pool, consider exiting when TVL drains, fee generation falls materially, ETH or UNI leaves the intended range, or the market thesis for the memecoin-family pool weakens. A reward expiry would also remove any incentive to tolerate the position if fee income is insufficient.

No reliable break-even period can be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history and range utilization are unavailable. The relevant comparison is whether ongoing fee income of 46.3% compensates for the position's realized price divergence and rebalancing costs.

No reliable break-even period can be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history and range utilization are unavailable. The relevant comparison is whether ongoing fee income of 46.3% compensates for the position's realized price divergence and rebalancing costs.

Latest insights

Research, Recaps & Solana Alpha

Data-driven yield analysis and weekly market wraps — written for active LPs.

All insights