ZEC-ZDOGon Raydium CLMMCLMMActive
- Chain
- Solana
- TVL
- TVL $45.68K
- APR
- 38.0% APR
- 24h Volume
- $6.43K 24h vol
- Fee tier
- 1.00% fee
- Pool address
- 9TRKbpkW…4Toq · observed 2026-10-24
new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score of 46/100 places this pool in a mixed, not decisive, position: Enter is 40/100, Hold is 54/100, and Exit is 27/100. The live verdict is HOLD, driven by ai_engine=hold, and the pool ranks #1547 of 9963 raydium-clmm pools, so it is above many listed pools but not near the strongest-ranked group. The assessment would weaken if TVL drains, volume falls, or fee APR collapses; it would improve if liquidity deepens and fee generation remains sustained without relying on emissions.
Computed 2026-10-24 16:15 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$45.68K
Total value locked
$6.43K
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up38.0%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ -15.2%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Wait & Monitor
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Use a deliberately monitored range rather than a set-and-forget position: set an alert for a sustained decline in 0.14x or fee accrual, and rebalance or exit when trading activity no longer justifies the range-management and memecoin exposure. Because current tick-in-range data is unavailable, avoid assuming that a selected range will remain active.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 38.0% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 32.2% | — | — |
| Volume | $6.43K | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $64.75 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 1 ZEC-ZDOG pools
by AI Farmer Score
#841 of 19497 on raydium-clmm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 4% of all Solana pools
overall rank #5397 of 148664
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the ZEC-ZDOG liquidity pool on Raydium CLMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing ZEC and ZDOG into a shared trading pool and receiving a share of the swap fees. Your holdings change as traders buy one token and sell the other, so you can finish with a different mix of ZEC and ZDOG and a different value than if you had held them separately.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
The yield decomposes into 32.2% from trading fees and 5.8% from rewards. 85% means the current APR is generated by swaps rather than emissions; the pool's dependence on rewards is not established, but no current reward contribution is reflected. Any future emissions should be treated as temporary and subject to decay, so exit timing should be based on sustained fee volume rather than an assumed incentive schedule.
shieldRisk Assessment
A seven-day impermanent-loss reading and tick-in-range reading are currently unavailable, so recent price divergence and range utilization cannot be quantified from these metrics. ZEC paired with a memecoin creates asymmetric price and liquidity risk: a sharp ZDOG move can push the position out of its active range or leave the LP holding more of the weaker asset. As a MEMECOIN pool, emissions may decay quickly if introduced, and exit timing should be tied to falling fee generation, declining liquidity, or a change in the ZDOG market rather than waiting for incentives to end.
tollZEC Context
ZEC is the established-asset side of this pair and supplies the reference price against which ZDOG is valued. Liquidity depth for ZEC outside this pool is not established by these pool metrics, so a ZDOG-driven price move can still produce substantial inventory imbalance even when ZEC itself has deeper markets elsewhere. For this LP, ZEC price movement matters through both the pair ratio and the value of the inventory received during rebalancing.
tollZDOG Context
ZDOG is the memecoin side of the pair and is likely to dominate the pool's idiosyncratic price and liquidity risk. Its liquidity depth outside this pool is not established here; a rapid rise can sell ZDOG from the LP position, while a rapid fall can concentrate the position in ZDOG. The more abruptly ZDOG moves relative to ZEC, the greater the potential range displacement and impermanent loss.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing ZEC and ZDOG into a shared trading pool and receiving a share of the swap fees. Your holdings change as traders buy one token and sell the other, so you can finish with a different mix of ZEC and ZDOG and a different value than if you had held them separately.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- 9TRKbpkWfbR6dmFAX1kGx1MReZ48K1j9VPcjUBMM4Toq
- Protocol
- Raydium CLMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- Concentrated Liquidity (CLMM)
- Token A
- ZEC (A7bdiYdS…)
- Token B
- ZDOG (EbT2jpoe…)
- Created
- 8/31/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
1%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-clmm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
Current yield is represented by 32.2% in fees and 5.8% in rewards, with 85%. If emissions are introduced later, their decay would reduce the reward component and total APR unless trading fees increase to offset it.
Current yield is represented by 32.2% in fees and 5.8% in rewards, with 85%. If emissions are introduced later, their decay would reduce the reward component and total APR unless trading fees increase to offset it.
The total APR would move toward the fee-only component, 32.2%, while the reward component would move toward 5.8% or another lower level. Because current fee sustainability is 85%, the position should be evaluated on actual volume and fees after incentives change, not on the prior headline APR.
The total APR would move toward the fee-only component, 32.2%, while the reward component would move toward 5.8% or another lower level. Because current fee sustainability is 85%, the position should be evaluated on actual volume and fees after incentives change, not on the prior headline APR.
The risk is high relative to a pair of established assets because ZDOG can move sharply and its external liquidity depth is not established here. With TVL of $46K and a volume-to-TVL ratio of 0.14x, a sudden price move or liquidity withdrawal could worsen execution and inventory imbalance.
The risk is high relative to a pair of established assets because ZDOG can move sharply and its external liquidity depth is not established here. With TVL of $46K and a volume-to-TVL ratio of 0.14x, a sudden price move or liquidity withdrawal could worsen execution and inventory imbalance.
For this pool, consider exiting when 0.14x declines persistently, fee income falls below your required return, TVL begins draining, or ZDOG liquidity and price behavior deteriorate. Do not wait solely for an emissions deadline, since current yield is fee-funded and future reward dependency is not established.
For this pool, consider exiting when 0.14x declines persistently, fee income falls below your required return, TVL begins draining, or ZDOG liquidity and price behavior deteriorate. Do not wait solely for an emissions deadline, since current yield is fee-funded and future reward dependency is not established.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because the recent impermanent-loss and range-utilization readings are unavailable and future volume is uncertain. As a rough fee-only reference, recovery depends on sustained 32.2% after accounting for price divergence, out-of-range time, and changes in ZEC-ZDOG liquidity.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because the recent impermanent-loss and range-utilization readings are unavailable and future volume is uncertain. As a rough fee-only reference, recovery depends on sustained 32.2% after accounting for price divergence, out-of-range time, and changes in ZEC-ZDOG liquidity.
