new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score of 17/100 is below the Enter threshold of 15/100 and the Hold threshold of 20/100, while the Exit threshold is 80/100. That produces the live verdict EXIT: the scanner is CRITICAL, the strong EXIT signal is unopposed, and the AI engine is only at hold. The pool ranks #699 of 2403 raydium-amm pools, so it is not being assessed in isolation. The assessment would improve only if sustained volume lifted fee generation, liquidity became more resilient, and the critical scanner signal cleared; a TVL drain or further yield collapse would reinforce the exit case.
Computed 2026-09-14 11:17 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$38.12K
Total value locked
$0.10
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up0.1%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ -1.0%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Avoid
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Use a narrow, actively monitored range only if you can rebalance promptly; set an exit trigger when 0.00x deteriorates further or when the unopposed strong EXIT signal persists after a material TVL drain.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 0.1% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 0.1% | — | — |
| Volume | $0.10 | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $0.00 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 1 USD1-FAFO pools
by AI Farmer Score
#13559 of 65350 on raydium-amm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 17% of all Solana pools
overall rank #18896 of 113637
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the USD1-FAFO liquidity pool on Raydium AMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing USD1 and FAFO together so traders can swap between them, while you receive a share of trading fees. If FAFO's price moves sharply or the pool becomes harder to trade, you can end up with more of the weaker asset and may not recover that loss through fees.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
Yield decomposes into 0.1% from trading fees and 0.0% from rewards. 100%. Reward dependency is not established, so the displayed APR should not be treated as evidence of durable emissions; fee income depends on whether volume improves from its current 0.00x level.
shieldRisk Assessment
Recent seven-day impermanent-loss history and tick-in-range history are unavailable, so realized inventory divergence and range utilization cannot be assessed from the supplied data. As a MEMECOIN pool, FAFO exposure adds sharp price-movement and liquidity-exit risk against USD1. Emission decay is also relevant: any future incentive-based return can decline, making exit timing more important when trading fees do not compensate for price divergence.
tollUSD1 Context
USD1 serves as the stable-value side of this pair, so its intended role is to provide a relatively steady reference asset while FAFO moves. Liquidity depth for USD1 elsewhere is not established here; a USD1 deviation or a wider USD1 market can alter the pool's inventory and execution conditions, affecting the LP's realized outcome.
tollFAFO Context
FAFO is the memecoin side of the pair and is the main source of directional price and liquidity risk. A sharp FAFO move can leave the LP holding more of the declining asset, while thin external liquidity can make rebalancing or exiting more costly.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing USD1 and FAFO together so traders can swap between them, while you receive a share of trading fees. If FAFO's price moves sharply or the pool becomes harder to trade, you can end up with more of the weaker asset and may not recover that loss through fees.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- 9XuSvXuvkkRdCmhXBHeK4uZP4HxZ5sUKT3EYAjidY6FL
- Protocol
- Raydium AMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- AMM
- Token A
- USD1 (USD1ttGY…)
- Token B
- FAFO (DcUwezFD…)
- Created
- 4/22/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
242%
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
3%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-amm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The displayed APR is 0.1%, consisting of 0.1% in fees and 0.0% in rewards. Because the current return is fee-funded, emission decay mainly matters if future rewards are introduced or if incentives were expected to support the pool after trading activity weakens.
The displayed APR is 0.1%, consisting of 0.1% in fees and 0.0% in rewards. Because the current return is fee-funded, emission decay mainly matters if future rewards are introduced or if incentives were expected to support the pool after trading activity weakens.
The reward component would no longer support LP returns, leaving fee income as the relevant source. For this pool, 100% already comes from trading fees, so the key question is whether $0 volume can generate sufficient fees after incentives are absent.
The reward component would no longer support LP returns, leaving fee income as the relevant source. For this pool, 100% already comes from trading fees, so the key question is whether $0 volume can generate sufficient fees after incentives are absent.
Risk is high relative to a pair of stable assets because FAFO can move sharply, become illiquid, or lose value while you hold the pool's inventory. The pool also has $38K TVL and 0.00x volume-to-TVL, which indicates limited current trading activity relative to liquidity.
Risk is high relative to a pair of stable assets because FAFO can move sharply, become illiquid, or lose value while you hold the pool's inventory. The pool also has $38K TVL and 0.00x volume-to-TVL, which indicates limited current trading activity relative to liquidity.
For USD1-FAFO, an exit is more defensible when the scanner remains CRITICAL, the unopposed strong EXIT signal persists, or TVL and volume deteriorate further. Reassess before emission changes reduce the pool's fee-independent support, and do not rely on the current 0.1% alone.
For USD1-FAFO, an exit is more defensible when the scanner remains CRITICAL, the unopposed strong EXIT signal persists, or TVL and volume deteriorate further. Reassess before emission changes reduce the pool's fee-independent support, and do not rely on the current 0.1% alone.
No defensible break-even period can be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history is unavailable and current fee generation is tied to limited volume. Compare realized fees against the eventual inventory loss rather than assuming 0.1% will repay any particular FAFO price move.
No defensible break-even period can be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history is unavailable and current fee generation is tied to limited volume. Compare realized fees against the eventual inventory loss rather than assuming 0.1% will repay any particular FAFO price move.
