new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score is 17/100, with Enter at 15/100, Hold at 20/100, Exit at 80/100, and a live verdict of EXIT. That assessment is consistent with ai_engine=hold being outweighed by scanner=CRITICAL and a strong, unopposed EXIT signal. The pool ranks #1436 of 8541 raydium-amm pools, so it is not near the bottom of the listed set, but the score still indicates that the current pool-specific conditions do not support maintaining exposure. A sustained increase in trading volume, deeper TVL, removal of the critical scanner finding, or a durable improvement in fee generation would change the assessment; a TVL drain or further yield collapse would reinforce it.
Computed 2026-08-30 00:02 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$38.26K
Total value locked
$56.45
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up0.2%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ -0.2%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Avoid
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
If entering, cap the position and set a hard review trigger when the scanner remains CRITICAL or the unopposed EXIT signal persists; also reassess the position if volume-to-TVL falls below 0.00x or the pool's fee APR no longer justifies the range exposure.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 0.2% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 0.2% | — | — |
| Volume | $56.45 | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $0.14 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 1 SOL-GIG pools
by AI Farmer Score
#2588 of 57843 on raydium-amm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 6% of all Solana pools
overall rank #5337 of 101565
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the SOL-GIG liquidity pool on Raydium AMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and GIG into a shared pool so traders can swap between them. In return, you receive a portion of trading fees, but the pool can leave you with more of the token that falls in value, and the current activity level is limited.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
The displayed yield decomposes into 0.2% fee APR and 0.0% reward APR, with 100%. Reward dependency and the remaining incentive schedule are not established, so the fee component is the more identifiable source of return. With 0.00x volume-to-TVL, fee production depends on a small amount of trading relative to the capital in the pool.
shieldRisk Assessment
Recent impermanent-loss history and the share of liquidity currently in range are not reported, so recent position efficiency cannot be verified. As a MEMECOIN pool, SOL-GIG is exposed to rapid changes in attention, thin or fragmented liquidity, sharp GIG price moves, and emission decay; exit timing matters if trading activity or incentives weaken. The low observed volume-to-TVL ratio also leaves limited evidence that fees can offset adverse price divergence.
tollSOL Context
SOL is the base asset in this pair and generally has substantially deeper liquidity across Solana than the SOL-GIG pool. If SOL rises or falls materially relative to GIG, the automated pool rebalances toward the asset that has underperformed, creating the familiar divergence exposure for the LP.
tollGIG Context
GIG is the memecoin side of the pair, and its liquidity outside this pool is not established by the supplied metrics. A sharp GIG repricing, loss of market attention, or fragmented external liquidity can increase execution gaps and leave the LP holding a larger share of the weaker asset after rebalancing.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and GIG into a shared pool so traders can swap between them. In return, you receive a portion of trading fees, but the pool can leave you with more of the token that falls in value, and the current activity level is limited.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- 9cw2DJkk8ZZcpUQaS7QSqjBKEoNrAhywZaVcaySEW5eZ
- Protocol
- Raydium AMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- AMM
- Token A
- SOL (So111111…)
- Token B
- GIG (4gLT1kgS…)
- Created
- 6/24/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
6%
APR
159%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-amm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
Emission decay would reduce the reward component, currently represented by 0.0%, and could lower total APR below 0.2% if fee generation does not increase. Because the pool is a MEMECOIN pool, declining incentives can also reduce liquidity and shorten the practical exit window.
Emission decay would reduce the reward component, currently represented by 0.0%, and could lower total APR below 0.2% if fee generation does not increase. Because the pool is a MEMECOIN pool, declining incentives can also reduce liquidity and shorten the practical exit window.
The reward component would fall toward zero, leaving the fee component of 0.2% as the identifiable ongoing source of return. With 0.00x volume-to-TVL, fee income may not be sufficient to compensate for price divergence or the opportunity cost of remaining in the pool.
The reward component would fall toward zero, leaving the fee component of 0.2% as the identifiable ongoing source of return. With 0.00x volume-to-TVL, fee income may not be sufficient to compensate for price divergence or the opportunity cost of remaining in the pool.
Risk is high relative to a SOL pair with a more established second asset because GIG can reprice rapidly and its outside liquidity is not established here. SOL-GIG also has a 0.00x volume-to-TVL ratio, while recent impermanent-loss and in-range history are unavailable for verification.
Risk is high relative to a SOL pair with a more established second asset because GIG can reprice rapidly and its outside liquidity is not established here. SOL-GIG also has a 0.00x volume-to-TVL ratio, while recent impermanent-loss and in-range history are unavailable for verification.
For SOL-GIG, an unopposed EXIT signal and CRITICAL scanner finding are already relevant exit conditions. A TVL drain, weaker fee generation than 0.2%, persistent low volume-to-TVL, or a sharp loss of GIG liquidity would further support leaving rather than waiting for emissions to decay.
For SOL-GIG, an unopposed EXIT signal and CRITICAL scanner finding are already relevant exit conditions. A TVL drain, weaker fee generation than 0.2%, persistent low volume-to-TVL, or a sharp loss of GIG liquidity would further support leaving rather than waiting for emissions to decay.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history is unavailable and the pool records only 0.00x volume-to-TVL. At the current fee rate of 0.2%, recovery depends on sustained trading and limited SOL-GIG price divergence, neither of which is assured.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history is unavailable and the pool records only 0.00x volume-to-TVL. At the current fee rate of 0.2%, recovery depends on sustained trading and limited SOL-GIG price divergence, neither of which is assured.
