new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score is 17/100, with Enter at 15/100, Hold at 20/100, and Exit at 80/100. The live verdict is EXIT: the AI engine reads hold, but the scanner is CRITICAL and the strong EXIT signal is unopposed, placing this pool at rank #1436 of 8541 raydium-amm pools. The assessment would improve only with demonstrably deeper TVL, sustained volume relative to liquidity, and durable fee generation; a TVL drain, further yield collapse, or reduced JAE liquidity would reinforce the exit case.
Computed 2026-10-12 11:49 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$32.32K
Total value locked
$0.28
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up0.2%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ -13.1%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Avoid
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
If entering, use a monitored range around the current SOL/JAE price and set an automatic review trigger for a sustained drop in swap flow or movement outside the range; exit when the scanner remains CRITICAL or the pool's liquidity begins to drain rather than waiting for emissions to improve.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 0.2% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 0.2% | — | — |
| Volume | $0.28 | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $0.00 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 1 SOL-JAE pools
by AI Farmer Score
#15023 of 83074 on raydium-amm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 16% of all Solana pools
overall rank #21427 of 135723
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the SOL-JAE liquidity pool on Raydium AMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and JAE into the pool so other users can swap between them, while you receive a share of swap fees. Your holdings can become more concentrated in the weaker-performing token, and the current low trading activity means the fee income is limited.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
The return decomposes into a fee-only APR of 0.2% and a reward-only APR of 0.0%. Fee sustainability is 100%, so the stated return depends on trading activity rather than a reward program. Reward dependency is not established, and no reliable reward duration can be inferred; for this MEMECOIN pool, any future emissions should be treated as potentially subject to rapid decay.
shieldRisk Assessment
Recent impermanent-loss history is unavailable, so realized loss cannot be quantified from the reported data. Recent tick-in-range behavior is also unavailable, leaving range exposure unmeasured. The MEMECOIN classification adds price-gap and liquidity-contraction risk, while emission decay and uncertain exit timing matter because low swap activity may not replace lost incentives or offset adverse token-price movement.
tollSOL Context
SOL is the established, more liquid asset in this pair and generally has deeper liquidity across Solana markets than JAE. SOL price movement changes the SOL/JAE ratio and can create inventory imbalance for the LP; a sharp SOL move can leave the position holding proportionally more JAE after arbitrage.
tollJAE Context
JAE is the pool's memecoin-side asset, with materially less dependable liquidity than SOL across the broader Solana market. Weak JAE liquidity or a rapid repricing can widen execution conditions, increase inventory concentration, and make exiting the LP position more difficult than exiting a SOL position elsewhere.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and JAE into the pool so other users can swap between them, while you receive a share of swap fees. Your holdings can become more concentrated in the weaker-performing token, and the current low trading activity means the fee income is limited.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- 9tcbvzThsdEmNvQHN17wQ4oibnHmG2jHfTHtGG9TpvAD
- Protocol
- Raydium AMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- AMM
- Token A
- SOL (So111111…)
- Token B
- JAE (9nQKC2fK…)
- Created
- 4/22/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
24%
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
28%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-amm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The current return already consists of 0.2% from fees and 0.0% from rewards, so there is no reported reward contribution supporting the APR. If emissions are introduced or reduced later, decay would lower the reward component while leaving fee income dependent on the pool's low trading activity.
The current return already consists of 0.2% from fees and 0.0% from rewards, so there is no reported reward contribution supporting the APR. If emissions are introduced or reduced later, decay would lower the reward component while leaving fee income dependent on the pool's low trading activity.
After incentives expire, the pool would rely on trading fees, represented by 0.2%, rather than rewards represented by 0.0%. Because reward dependency and timing are not established, an expiry could expose the pool's limited swap demand without a compensating incentive stream.
After incentives expire, the pool would rely on trading fees, represented by 0.2%, rather than rewards represented by 0.0%. Because reward dependency and timing are not established, an expiry could expose the pool's limited swap demand without a compensating incentive stream.
Risk is elevated because JAE can reprice sharply against SOL, liquidity can contract, and swap activity is low relative to the pool's liquidity. Recent impermanent-loss and range-history data are unavailable, so the size and frequency of those effects cannot be estimated from the reported record.
Risk is elevated because JAE can reprice sharply against SOL, liquidity can contract, and swap activity is low relative to the pool's liquidity. Recent impermanent-loss and range-history data are unavailable, so the size and frequency of those effects cannot be estimated from the reported record.
For SOL-JAE, an exit review is warranted if the scanner remains CRITICAL, JAE liquidity deteriorates, or volume fails to support the pool's liquidity. A sustained TVL drain or further decline in fee generation would strengthen the case for exiting rather than waiting for uncertain emissions.
For SOL-JAE, an exit review is warranted if the scanner remains CRITICAL, JAE liquidity deteriorates, or volume fails to support the pool's liquidity. A sustained TVL drain or further decline in fee generation would strengthen the case for exiting rather than waiting for uncertain emissions.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history is unavailable and trading activity is only $0 against $32K of liquidity. The fee-only APR of 0.2% provides the relevant recovery rate, but it is not sufficient to estimate recovery without the size of the price divergence.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history is unavailable and trading activity is only $0 against $32K of liquidity. The fee-only APR of 0.2% provides the relevant recovery rate, but it is not sufficient to estimate recovery without the size of the price divergence.
