new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score of 17/100 places this pool below its Enter threshold of 15/100 and Hold threshold of 20/100, while the Exit threshold is 80/100. The live verdict is EXIT, consistent with the scanner being CRITICAL and the strong EXIT signal being unopposed, even though the AI engine reads hold; the pool ranks #1436 of 8541 raydium-amm pools. The assessment would improve with sustained volume growth, deeper TVL, clearer lifecycle and reward data, and removal of the critical scanner condition; a TVL drain, weaker fees, or yield collapse would reinforce the exit case.
Computed 2026-07-23 21:17 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$30.85K
Total value locked
$15.59
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up8.9%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ 0.0%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Avoid
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Enter only with a predefined exit trigger: close the position if the scanner remains CRITICAL and unopposed while 0.00x stays at its current level across repeated daily observations; do not wait for a reward increase to justify continued exposure.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 8.9% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 8.6% | — | — |
| Volume | $15.59 | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $0.04 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 1 SOL-mcs pools
by AI Farmer Score
#15127 of 55835 on raydium-amm
by AI Farmer Score
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the SOL-mcs liquidity pool on Raydium AMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and MCS into a shared pool so traders can swap between them, while you receive a share of trading fees. You can end up with more of the token that performed worse, and the pool's low activity means the stated return depends on limited trading rather than extra rewards.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
The yield decomposes into 8.6% from trading fees and 0.4% from incentives. 96% of the stated yield comes from trading fees, while reward dependency is not established beyond the current reward component. For this MEMECOIN pool, any future emissions should be treated as temporary: emission decay or incentive removal would reduce APR unless trading volume increases.
shieldRisk Assessment
A reliable recent impermanent-loss history is not available, and recent tick-in-range exposure is also unreported, so the position cannot be evaluated from those two observations. The principal family-specific risk is MEMECOIN volatility combined with uncertain lifecycle and exit liquidity: price divergence can create losses while declining attention can reduce fees and make exit execution less reliable. Emission decay matters because any future reward stream could fall before the underlying pool develops durable volume.
tollSOL Context
SOL is the liquid, widely traded side of this pair and generally has deeper liquidity elsewhere on Solana. SOL price moves relative to MCS determine the pool's inventory shift: a strong SOL move can leave the LP holding more of the weaker-performing asset after arbitrage.
tollmcs Context
MCS is the memecoin exposure and is likely to have materially less dependable liquidity outside this pool than SOL. A sharp MCS repricing, thin external markets, or fading attention can increase inventory imbalance, widen effective exit costs, and reduce the fee flow available to LPs.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and MCS into a shared pool so traders can swap between them, while you receive a share of trading fees. You can end up with more of the token that performed worse, and the pool's low activity means the stated return depends on limited trading rather than extra rewards.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- A6iJchEdJkaLHKSiRnGRcqdrk3NZt7qUKWWix6dywPE4
- Protocol
- Raydium AMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- AMM
- Token A
- SOL (So111111…)
- Token B
- mcs (ALHFgnXS…)
- Created
- 4/22/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
0%
APR
7%
APR
0%
APR
208%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-amm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The current reward contribution is 0.4%, while fee income contributes 8.6%. If future MCS emissions decay, total APR will fall unless trading volume rises enough to replace them.
The current reward contribution is 0.4%, while fee income contributes 8.6%. If future MCS emissions decay, total APR will fall unless trading volume rises enough to replace them.
With reward-only APR at 0.4%, incentive expiry would remove little or none of the currently stated yield, leaving 8.6% as the main return source. At $31K TVL and $16 of recent volume, fee income would remain dependent on limited trading activity.
With reward-only APR at 0.4%, incentive expiry would remove little or none of the currently stated yield, leaving 8.6% as the main return source. At $31K TVL and $16 of recent volume, fee income would remain dependent on limited trading activity.
Risk is high because MCS can move sharply, lose external liquidity, or become less relevant while SOL remains liquid elsewhere. This pool has $31K TVL, $16 of recent volume, and a Vol/TVL ratio of 0.00x, so exiting after a large price move may be difficult.
Risk is high because MCS can move sharply, lose external liquidity, or become less relevant while SOL remains liquid elsewhere. This pool has $31K TVL, $16 of recent volume, and a Vol/TVL ratio of 0.00x, so exiting after a large price move may be difficult.
For SOL-MCS, an exit is justified when the CRITICAL scanner condition and unopposed EXIT signal persist, particularly if 0.00x does not improve or $31K declines. Do not rely on 8.9% alone if fee volume is weakening.
For SOL-MCS, an exit is justified when the CRITICAL scanner condition and unopposed EXIT signal persist, particularly if 0.00x does not improve or $31K declines. Do not rely on 8.9% alone if fee volume is weakening.
There is no reliable recent impermanent-loss history from which to calculate a defensible break-even period. Fees accrue at 8.6%, but recovery depends on future volume, price divergence between SOL and MCS, and whether the position remains tradable.
There is no reliable recent impermanent-loss history from which to calculate a defensible break-even period. Fees accrue at 8.6%, but recovery depends on future volume, price divergence between SOL and MCS, and whether the position remains tradable.
