Wealthville Score
Verdict AVOID · 58% confidence
new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score is 19/100, with Enter at 10/100, Hold at 30/100, and Exit at 60/100. The live verdict is AVOID, driven by ai_engine=hold, and the pool ranks #730 of 8541 raydium-amm pools, placing it above many pools in the listed universe but not making it a low-risk position. The hold assessment is consistent with fee-funded yield and existing liquidity that may justify monitoring, while the modest activity and memecoin exposure argue against treating the pool as durable. A TVL drain, a collapse in trading fees, or deterioration in the pool's ability to retain liquidity would change the assessment toward exit; sustained volume and deeper liquidity without relying on emissions would improve it.
Computed 2026-09-14 22:41 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$163.07K
Total value locked
$2.00K
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up2.7%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ -18.0%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Avoid
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Use a range only if the position can be monitored, and rebalance or exit when the SOL/FAFO price approaches the range boundary or when refreshed readings show a material decline from 0.01x. Do not wait for an incentive-based exit signal because the current reward component is 0.0%.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 2.7% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 2.7% | — | — |
| Volume | $2.00K | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $4.99 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 5 SOL-FAFO pools
by AI Farmer Score
#3280 of 67260 on raydium-amm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 7% of all Solana pools
overall rank #7398 of 116409
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the SOL-FAFO liquidity pool on Raydium AMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and FAFO into a shared pool that traders use to swap between them. You earn part of the trading fees, but the value of your deposit can fall relative to simply holding the two tokens if their prices move sharply or the pool loses activity.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
The displayed APR decomposes into 2.7% from trading fees and 0.0% from rewards. Fee sustainability is 99%, so current reported yield does not depend on an active reward allocation; however, reward dependency and the persistence of any future incentives are not established. Fee income will vary with trading volume and liquidity, so the displayed APR should not be treated as fixed.
shieldRisk Assessment
Seven-day impermanent-loss history and seven-day tick-in-range coverage are not reported for this pool, limiting retrospective assessment of price divergence and range utilization. As a MEMECOIN pool, SOL-FAFO carries token-specific volatility, liquidity, and adverse-selection risk in addition to ordinary LP exposure. Emissions can decay or end in this category, and the pool lifecycle is not established, so exit timing should be based on declining volume, shrinking liquidity, or deteriorating fee generation rather than assumed reward persistence.
tollSOL Context
SOL is the pool's base asset and has substantially deeper liquidity across Solana markets than FAFO, which generally makes its market price more observable. A sharp SOL move against FAFO can increase the LP's inventory imbalance and produce impermanent loss even when the position continues earning fees. SOL price strength can also leave the LP with relatively more FAFO after rebalancing.
tollFAFO Context
FAFO is the memecoin side of the pair, so its liquidity and price discovery are likely more dependent on this pool and a smaller set of venues than SOL. A rapid FAFO repricing, liquidity withdrawal, or demand reversal can create large inventory shifts and widen the gap between fee income and impermanent loss. Its price action should therefore be evaluated separately from the pool's headline APR.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and FAFO into a shared pool that traders use to swap between them. You earn part of the trading fees, but the value of your deposit can fall relative to simply holding the two tokens if their prices move sharply or the pool loses activity.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- ADpoE7CoikKvvNwG3TFtkXHX3NvwiWtGZ7Zz8rMm2cvd
- Protocol
- Raydium AMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- AMM
- Token A
- SOL (So111111…)
- Token B
- FAFO (BP8RUdhL…)
- Created
- 4/22/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
242%
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
3%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-amm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The current reward component is 0.0%, while fee income is 2.7% and fee sustainability is 99%. If future emissions are introduced and then decay, the reward portion would fall, but current displayed APR is primarily determined by trading fees.
The current reward component is 0.0%, while fee income is 2.7% and fee sustainability is 99%. If future emissions are introduced and then decay, the reward portion would fall, but current displayed APR is primarily determined by trading fees.
Because the current reward component is 0.0%, expiring incentives would not remove a currently displayed reward stream. The remaining return would depend on 2.7%, which can decline if trading volume or liquidity falls.
Because the current reward component is 0.0%, expiring incentives would not remove a currently displayed reward stream. The remaining return would depend on 2.7%, which can decline if trading volume or liquidity falls.
Risk is elevated because FAFO can experience sharper price moves and thinner liquidity than SOL, creating larger inventory shifts and impermanent loss. The pool has TVL of $163K and a volume-to-liquidity ratio of 0.01x, so fee generation may be limited if activity weakens.
Risk is elevated because FAFO can experience sharper price moves and thinner liquidity than SOL, creating larger inventory shifts and impermanent loss. The pool has TVL of $163K and a volume-to-liquidity ratio of 0.01x, so fee generation may be limited if activity weakens.
For SOL-FAFO, consider exiting when TVL drains, trading activity falls materially below the level implied by 0.01x, or the SOL/FAFO price approaches a range boundary without a clear reason to expect renewed flow. A reward-based exit is less relevant while the reward component is 0.0%.
For SOL-FAFO, consider exiting when TVL drains, trading activity falls materially below the level implied by 0.01x, or the SOL/FAFO price approaches a range boundary without a clear reason to expect renewed flow. A reward-based exit is less relevant while the reward component is 0.0%.
A reliable break-even estimate cannot be calculated because recent impermanent-loss and range-utilization history are not reported. Fee income accrues at 2.7%, but break-even depends on future volume, price divergence, rebalancing, and whether the position remains active long enough for fees to offset the loss.
A reliable break-even estimate cannot be calculated because recent impermanent-loss and range-utilization history are not reported. Fee income accrues at 2.7%, but break-even depends on future volume, price divergence, rebalancing, and whether the position remains active long enough for fees to offset the loss.
