new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score of 17/100 assigns Enter 15/100, Hold 20/100, and Exit 80/100, producing a live verdict of EXIT from the ai_engine=hold driver. Its rank of #1908 of 18146 raydium-amm pools places it in a broad middle tier rather than among the strongest or weakest pools by that measure. The hold assessment is consistent with fee-funded yield and high turnover relative to liquidity, balanced against uncertain persistence, unavailable recent IL and range data, and memecoin volatility. A sustained TVL drain, collapse in volume or fee APR, adverse external liquidity conditions, or newly introduced rewards that decay quickly would change the assessment.
Computed 2026-11-05 03:07 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$8.82K
Total value locked
$3.30K
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up485.1%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ 66.2%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Avoid
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Use a fee-based exit rule: enter only with a minimum fee APR set in advance, and close the position if realized fee APR falls below that floor for two consecutive daily observations or if the pool's trading activity contracts enough that fees no longer justify memecoin price risk.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 485.1% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 177.1% | — | — |
| Volume | $3.30K | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $8.25 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 1 GB-AMD pools
by AI Farmer Score
#1066 of 95936 on raydium-amm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 2% of all Solana pools
overall rank #2223 of 153992
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the GB-AMD liquidity pool on Raydium AMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing GB and AMD into a shared pool so other people can swap between them. You receive trading fees, but the amounts of GB and AMD you own can shift, and a large price move in either token can leave you with less value than simply holding both.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
GB-AMD decomposes into 177.1% fee APR and 308.0% reward APR, with 37% of yield sourced from trading fees. Reward dependency is not established by the available pool data, so the fee figure should be tested against changing volume rather than treated as a fixed return. Because the pool is in the MEMECOIN family, any future emissions would be subject to decay and should be assessed against an intended exit window.
shieldRisk Assessment
A usable seven-day impermanent-loss reading and tick-in-range reading are not available for this pool, so recent loss experience and range behavior cannot be quantified from the sheet. The main family-specific risk is memecoin price divergence: sharp movement in either GB or AMD can create inventory imbalance and losses relative to simply holding the tokens. Emission decay and fast exit timing also matter; if rewards are introduced, their contribution can fall before trading fees provide a stable replacement.
tollGB Context
GB is one side of this pool and its price changes determine how the pool's inventory shifts against AMD. Liquidity depth for GB outside this pool is not established by the available data, so a thin external market could increase slippage and make rebalancing or exiting more costly. A sharp GB move can increase impermanent-loss exposure even while it generates swap fees.
tollAMD Context
AMD is the other side of the pair, so its price action has the same inventory and impermanent-loss effect from the opposite direction. Its liquidity depth elsewhere is not established by this pool sheet, leaving external exit conditions uncertain. A large AMD move can change the pool composition and raise the importance of timely rebalancing or withdrawal.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing GB and AMD into a shared pool so other people can swap between them. You receive trading fees, but the amounts of GB and AMD you own can shift, and a large price move in either token can leave you with less value than simply holding both.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- AJjEj8KKGFHQCE3XrfyR6atGhnPkzVnkBiLkbayHhZ8h
- Protocol
- Raydium AMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- AMM
- Token A
- GB (9GEUA6pX…)
- Token B
- AMD (AMD8XwJX…)
- Created
- 9/18/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
18%
APR
0%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-amm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The current breakdown is 177.1% from fees and 308.0% from rewards, so the stated return is fee-led rather than dependent on active emissions. If rewards are added later, emission decay would reduce the reward component while leaving only trading fees to support 485.1%.
The current breakdown is 177.1% from fees and 308.0% from rewards, so the stated return is fee-led rather than dependent on active emissions. If rewards are added later, emission decay would reduce the reward component while leaving only trading fees to support 485.1%.
If incentives are introduced and then expire, the reward portion would fall toward 308.0% and the remaining return would depend on 177.1%. Since 37% already attributes the yield to fees, the key test is whether trading volume remains sufficient after incentives stop.
If incentives are introduced and then expire, the reward portion would fall toward 308.0% and the remaining return would depend on 177.1%. Since 37% already attributes the yield to fees, the key test is whether trading volume remains sufficient after incentives stop.
The risk is high relative to a less volatile token pair because GB and AMD can move sharply and external liquidity depth is not established here. Fees may offset some losses, but the unavailable recent IL history means the pool's actual short-term protection from fees cannot be measured.
The risk is high relative to a less volatile token pair because GB and AMD can move sharply and external liquidity depth is not established here. Fees may offset some losses, but the unavailable recent IL history means the pool's actual short-term protection from fees cannot be measured.
Use a predefined fee and liquidity trigger: exit if realized fee APR falls below your minimum or if TVL and trading activity deteriorate enough that fees no longer compensate for price divergence. An exit is also reasonable when you no longer want exposure to GB or AMD, regardless of the live verdict EXIT.
Use a predefined fee and liquidity trigger: exit if realized fee APR falls below your minimum or if TVL and trading activity deteriorate enough that fees no longer compensate for price divergence. An exit is also reasonable when you no longer want exposure to GB or AMD, regardless of the live verdict EXIT.
A reliable break-even time cannot be calculated because recent seven-day IL history is unavailable and future volume is uncertain. The relevant offset is 177.1%, but that annualized figure can change quickly if the pool's turnover declines.
A reliable break-even time cannot be calculated because recent seven-day IL history is unavailable and future volume is uncertain. The relevant offset is 177.1%, but that annualized figure can change quickly if the pool's turnover declines.
