new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score is 42/100, with Enter at 39/100, Hold at 46/100, Exit at 35/100, and live verdict HOLD. That combination supports retaining an existing position more than initiating a new one: the pool ranks #76 of 2612 meteora-dlmm pools, while the verdict driver is ai_engine=hold. The assessment would change if TVL drained, volume fell enough to undermine 209.7%, GLDX volatility increased materially, or a new reward program altered the pool's risk and fee balance.
Computed 2026-11-06 03:27 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$24.37K
Total value locked
$13.89K
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up500.0%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ 142.8%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Wait & Monitor
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Use a range centered on the current GLDX/SOL price and set a review trigger after a 20% price move in either direction; rebalance only if the position remains in range and fee generation justifies the added exposure, otherwise exit if pool TVL falls materially below $24K or volume contracts sharply.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 500.0% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 209.7% | — | — |
| Volume | $13.89K | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $102.27 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#2 of 2 GLDx-SOL pools
by AI Farmer Score
#387 of 4541 on meteora-dlmm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 2% of all Solana pools
overall rank #2140 of 153992
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the GLDx-SOL liquidity pool on Meteora DLMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing GLDX and SOL into the pool so traders can swap between them. You receive trading fees, but the amounts of each token you hold change as GLDX moves against SOL, and a large price move can leave you with more of the weaker-performing asset.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
The displayed yield decomposes into 209.7% fee APR and 290.3% reward APR, with 42% of yield attributed to trading fees. No active reward contribution is reflected, and the pool's reward dependency and emission schedule are not established in the supplied data. For this MEMECOIN pool, any future emission decay would affect only the reward component; fee income would continue to depend on trading volume and liquidity placement.
shieldRisk Assessment
A reliable seven-day impermanent-loss reading is unavailable, and seven-day tick-in-range history is also unavailable, so recent range efficiency and realized IL cannot be assessed from these metrics. The main pool-specific risk is MEMECOIN price movement: a sharp GLDX move against SOL can create inventory imbalance and impermanent loss, while declining activity can reduce fee income quickly. Emission lifecycle information is not established; because there is no current reward APR shown, exit timing should be based on fee deterioration, liquidity loss, or adverse GLDX price action rather than waiting for a known incentive expiry.
tollGLDx Context
GLDX is the memecoin side of this pair, so providing liquidity means holding GLDX exposure even as the position composition changes with price movement. Liquidity depth for GLDX outside this pool is not quantified here; thinner external liquidity would make sharp price moves, slippage, and inventory conversion more consequential for the LP.
tollSOL Context
SOL is the reference asset against which GLDX price performance is measured and generally has broader Solana ecosystem liquidity than a memecoin such as GLDX. If GLDX falls against SOL, the pool tends to accumulate GLDX while selling SOL; if GLDX rises, it tends to sell GLDX and accumulate SOL, creating the principal inventory effect for this LP.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing GLDX and SOL into the pool so traders can swap between them. You receive trading fees, but the amounts of each token you hold change as GLDX moves against SOL, and a large price move can leave you with more of the weaker-performing asset.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- ARABCijrKikX1C6KWgsmseyNj1cfneQajbYLNdw6LGaA
- Protocol
- Meteora DLMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- AMM
- Token A
- GLDx (Xsv9hRk1…)
- Token B
- SOL (So111111…)
- Created
- 9/4/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
0%
APR
1%
APR
0%
APR
7%
By Protocol
hubAll meteora-dlmm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The current reward component is 290.3%, so stated APR is presently driven by 209.7% in fees rather than emissions. If future rewards are introduced and then decay, only that reward component would decline; fee APR would still depend on trading activity.
The current reward component is 290.3%, so stated APR is presently driven by 209.7% in fees rather than emissions. If future rewards are introduced and then decay, only that reward component would decline; fee APR would still depend on trading activity.
There is no current reward contribution reflected in 290.3%, so an incentive expiry would not remove a currently stated reward stream. After any change, the remaining yield would be determined mainly by trading fees, represented by 209.7%, and by the pool's volume and liquidity.
There is no current reward contribution reflected in 290.3%, so an incentive expiry would not remove a currently stated reward stream. After any change, the remaining yield would be determined mainly by trading fees, represented by 209.7%, and by the pool's volume and liquidity.
Risk is elevated because GLDX can move sharply against SOL, causing impermanent loss and changing the token mix in the position. Fee income is currently represented by 209.7%, but that annualized figure can fall rapidly if trading volume or liquidity declines.
Risk is elevated because GLDX can move sharply against SOL, causing impermanent loss and changing the token mix in the position. Fee income is currently represented by 209.7%, but that annualized figure can fall rapidly if trading volume or liquidity declines.
Consider exiting when GLDX volatility makes the position's inventory materially different from your intended exposure, when fee generation no longer compensates for that risk, or when pool TVL declines materially below $24K. Do not rely on a known emissions deadline here because the reward lifecycle is not established in the supplied data.
Consider exiting when GLDX volatility makes the position's inventory materially different from your intended exposure, when fee generation no longer compensates for that risk, or when pool TVL declines materially below $24K. Do not rely on a known emissions deadline here because the reward lifecycle is not established in the supplied data.
No reliable break-even period can be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history is unavailable and 209.7% is an annualized rate that changes with volume. At a constant fee rate and negligible price divergence, fees could offset losses relatively quickly, but a sustained GLDX move against SOL can extend or prevent break-even.
No reliable break-even period can be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history is unavailable and 209.7% is an annualized rate that changes with volume. At a constant fee rate and negligible price divergence, fees could offset losses relatively quickly, but a sustained GLDX move against SOL can extend or prevent break-even.
