WealthVille
SOL
S
CHIN
C

SOL-CHINon Raydium AMM

Chain
Solana
TVL
TVL $34.61K
APR
0.3% APR
24h Volume
$40.05 24h vol
Fee tier
1.00% fee
Pool address
AT4SuDom7H8h · observed 2026-09-16
17F · Poor

Wealthville Score

Verdict EXIT · 70% confidence

ai_engine=holdscanner=CRITICAL
How this score works →
Enter15

new capital

Hold20

keep position

Exit80

urgency to leave

The Wealthville Score is 17/100, below its Enter threshold of 15/100 and Hold threshold of 20/100, while the Exit threshold is 80/100. The live verdict is EXIT, supported by ai_engine=hold, scanner=CRITICAL, and a strong EXIT signal marked unopposed. The pool ranks #1436 of 8541 raydium-amm pools, so the score places it in a materially weak segment rather than identifying a broad protocol opportunity. The assessment would improve only if sustained trading volume increased relative to liquidity, liquidity deepened, and the scanner no longer identified critical conditions; a TVL drain or further yield collapse would reinforce the exit case.

Computed 2026-09-14 11:17 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.

Liquidityhelp

lock

$34.61K

Total value locked

$40.05

24h volume

×0.0 turnover

Yieldhelp

trending_up

0.3%

advertised APR

Fee yield, annualized

0.1%

adjusted · net of IL (est.)

1.00% fee

My Position

account_balance_wallet
Live DataUpdated 1809m ago
block

AI Verdict

Avoid

WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.

check_circleFee-driven yield: 100% of APR from trading fees
warningElevated risk score: 65/100
tips_and_updates

Enter only with a monitored range and set an exit trigger for a sustained loss of swap activity or a liquidity drain; with the live verdict at EXIT and an unopposed strong EXIT signal, do not leave the position unattended through an incentive or volume deterioration.

syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background

table_chart

Performance Breakdown

Metric24h / Day7d / Week30d / Month
Total APR0.3%
Fee APR0.3%
Volume$40.05
Fees Earned$0.40

Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.

analytics

Efficiency Metrics

Computed

Deterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.

Sustainable Gross APY
0.4%(trailing 7d fees)
Impermanent-Loss Drag
−0.3%(realized, 30d annualized)
Adjusted Net APY (est.)
0.1%(after IL + repositioning)
Volume / TVL Ratio (24h)
0.00x
Fee Yield per $1 TVL / Day
$0.0000
Fee APR Sustainability
100% from trading fees(sustainable)
leaderboard

Pool Rankings

compare_arrows

#1 of 1 SOL-CHIN pools

by AI Farmer Score

hub

#13751 of 67260 on raydium-amm

by AI Farmer Score

leaderboard

Top 17% of all Solana pools

overall rank #19587 of 116409

lightbulb

How This Pool Works

Beginner Friendly

This page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the SOL-CHIN liquidity pool on Raydium AMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.

Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and CHIN into the pool so other users can swap between them. You receive a share of trading fees, but your final holdings can differ from what you deposited, and the low activity means the income is limited.

description

Pool Analysis

trending_upYield Source Breakdown

Yield decomposes into 0.3% from trading fees and 0.0% from incentives. 100% of yield comes from trading fees, so the return depends on actual swap flow rather than emissions. Reward duration is not established, so the displayed APR should not be treated as a durable forward rate.

shieldRisk Assessment

Seven-day impermanent-loss history is unavailable, and seven-day tick-in-range data is also unavailable, limiting historical assessment of price divergence and range utilization. As a MEMECOIN pool, SOL-CHIN carries token-specific liquidity and price-dislocation risk; emission decay can remove any temporary incentive support, making exit timing important before liquidity or trading activity deteriorates.

tollSOL Context

SOL is the established asset in this pair and generally has substantially deeper liquidity elsewhere on Solana than this pool. SOL price moves against CHIN change the pool's asset mix and can create impermanent loss relative to simply holding the two assets, especially when CHIN does not follow SOL.

tollCHIN Context

CHIN is the memecoin-side asset, so its liquidity and price discovery should not be inferred from SOL's broader market depth. A sharp CHIN move, fragmented liquidity, or reduced buyer demand can move the position away from its initial balance and make exit execution more difficult.

lightbulbSimple Explanation

Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and CHIN into the pool so other users can swap between them. You receive a share of trading fees, but your final holdings can differ from what you deposited, and the low activity means the income is limited.

token

Token Details

SOL
SOLWrapped SOLSolana

Solana is a high-performance blockchain supporting builders around the world creating crypto apps that scale today.

CHIN
CHINFITCHINSolana
Explorer

FITCHIN (CHIN) — one of the two assets paired in this liquidity pool.

info

Pool Details

Pool Address
AT4SuDomNtDCJRAY2H9WrrLZ7ZqfHXaeNYXWtsnL7H8h
Protocol
Raydium AMM
Chain
solana
Fee Tier
Pool Type
AMM
Token A
SOL (So111111…)
Token B
CHIN (CHiNsA2B…)
Created
5/22/2026
lock

Non-Custodial

Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.

source

Verified Data Sources

Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield

psychology

AI-Powered Analysis

Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data

⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.

quiz

Frequently Asked Questions

The reward component is 0.0%, so emission decay has little or no current contribution to the displayed 0.3%. If incentives decline further, the remaining return depends on 0.3% from trading fees.

The reward component is 0.0%, so emission decay has little or no current contribution to the displayed 0.3%. If incentives decline further, the remaining return depends on 0.3% from trading fees.

Because the reward component is 0.0% and 100% of yield already comes from fees, incentive expiry would leave trading fees as the economic basis for LP returns. With 0.00x activity, the resulting yield may be insufficient to offset price divergence or withdrawal costs.

Because the reward component is 0.0% and 100% of yield already comes from fees, incentive expiry would leave trading fees as the economic basis for LP returns. With 0.00x activity, the resulting yield may be insufficient to offset price divergence or withdrawal costs.

Risk is high relative to a SOL pair with a more established second asset because CHIN can experience abrupt price moves and thinner exit liquidity. The pool also has $35K liquidity, $40 in 24-hour volume, and a live EXIT assessment.

Risk is high relative to a SOL pair with a more established second asset because CHIN can experience abrupt price moves and thinner exit liquidity. The pool also has $35K liquidity, $40 in 24-hour volume, and a live EXIT assessment.

For SOL-CHIN, an exit is especially defensible when liquidity drains, swap activity remains weak, or the scanner's critical condition persists. The current live verdict is EXIT, with a strong unopposed EXIT signal, so waiting for a reward increase is not a sufficient exit plan.

For SOL-CHIN, an exit is especially defensible when liquidity drains, swap activity remains weak, or the scanner's critical condition persists. The current live verdict is EXIT, with a strong unopposed EXIT signal, so waiting for a reward increase is not a sufficient exit plan.

There is no reliable break-even estimate because seven-day impermanent-loss history is unavailable and the fee rate is only 0.3% annuallyized in the displayed metrics. At 0.3%, recovery would require stable price relationships and sustained fee generation, neither of which is established by the current activity level.

There is no reliable break-even estimate because seven-day impermanent-loss history is unavailable and the fee rate is only 0.3% annuallyized in the displayed metrics. At 0.3%, recovery would require stable price relationships and sustained fee generation, neither of which is established by the current activity level.

Latest insights

Research, Recaps & Solana Alpha

Data-driven yield analysis and weekly market wraps — written for active LPs.

All insights