new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score of 46/100 places this pool below the Enter threshold of 40/100 and Hold threshold of 53/100, while the Exit threshold is 28/100; the live verdict is HOLD. Its rank of #1436 of 8541 raydium-amm pools is consistent with a weak relative position, and the assessment is reinforced by the CRITICAL scanner result and the strong unopposed EXIT signal, despite the ai_engine reading of hold. The assessment would improve only if sustained volume increased relative to TVL, liquidity remained stable, and fee income or verified incentives rose; a TVL drain, weaker volume, or yield collapse would strengthen the exit case.
Computed 2026-08-24 03:15 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$358.06K
Total value locked
$13.03K
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up3.3%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ 1.6%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Wait & Monitor
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Enter only with a defined exit trigger: withdraw if daily volume remains near its current low level while TVL drains, or if scanner risk remains CRITICAL after a rebalance review. Use a narrow range only if you can monitor it frequently; otherwise keep the position small enough to exit without materially moving the WW3 side.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 3.3% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 3.3% | — | — |
| Volume | $13.03K | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $32.58 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 1 SOL-Ww3 pools
by AI Farmer Score
#1909 of 53795 on raydium-amm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 5% of all Solana pools
overall rank #4484 of 95923
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the SOL-Ww3 liquidity pool on Raydium AMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and WW3 into a shared pool so other users can swap between them. You receive a share of trading fees, but a large price move in either token can leave you with a less valuable mix than simply holding both tokens.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
The total APR of 3.3% decomposes into 3.3% from trading fees and 0.1% from rewards. Fee sustainability is 98%, so the displayed return depends on swap activity rather than emissions. Reward duration is not established for this pool, so future incentive changes cannot be scheduled from the available data.
shieldRisk Assessment
A seven-day impermanent-loss history and tick-in-range history are not currently reported, so recent price divergence and range utilization cannot be quantified. As a MEMECOIN pool, SOL-WW3 is exposed to sharp WW3 repricing, thin liquidity, and emission decay if incentives are introduced; exit timing matters because fee income may not compensate for a rapid token move.
tollSOL Context
SOL is the established network asset in this pair and generally has broader liquidity across Solana venues than WW3. SOL price movement changes the pool's balance and can create impermanent loss for an LP when SOL and WW3 diverge, while SOL-side liquidity may make rebalancing easier than on the WW3 side.
tollWw3 Context
WW3 is the memecoin-side asset and is likely to dominate idiosyncratic price and liquidity risk in this pair. A sharp WW3 rally or selloff can shift the LP toward the weaker-performing asset, and thin external liquidity can increase slippage when exiting or rebalancing.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and WW3 into a shared pool so other users can swap between them. You receive a share of trading fees, but a large price move in either token can leave you with a less valuable mix than simply holding both tokens.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- AU48WDisqPvwUM431WkhhkFoJg76ek44eRnf7NpStc9B
- Protocol
- Raydium AMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- AMM
- Token A
- SOL (So111111…)
- Token B
- Ww3 (7m2TUkpP…)
- Created
- 4/22/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
46%
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
168%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-amm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The current total APR is 3.3%, consisting of 3.3% in fees and 0.1% in rewards. Because fee sustainability is 98%, any future emission decay would mainly remove reward income; the duration of rewards is not established for this pool.
The current total APR is 3.3%, consisting of 3.3% in fees and 0.1% in rewards. Because fee sustainability is 98%, any future emission decay would mainly remove reward income; the duration of rewards is not established for this pool.
The reward component would fall toward zero, leaving fee income as the remaining source of LP return. That matters here because the pool already has 3.3% fee APR and 0.1% reward APR, while volume-to-TVL is only 0.04x.
The reward component would fall toward zero, leaving fee income as the remaining source of LP return. That matters here because the pool already has 3.3% fee APR and 0.1% reward APR, while volume-to-TVL is only 0.04x.
Risk is high because WW3 can move sharply and may have less external liquidity than SOL. The pool's live verdict is HOLD, with a CRITICAL scanner signal, and the available data does not provide a recent seven-day impermanent-loss or range-utilization history.
Risk is high because WW3 can move sharply and may have less external liquidity than SOL. The pool's live verdict is HOLD, with a CRITICAL scanner signal, and the available data does not provide a recent seven-day impermanent-loss or range-utilization history.
For SOL-WW3, an exit review is warranted if TVL falls from $358K, volume remains around $13K, or the scanner's CRITICAL condition persists. A sharp WW3 move, worsening execution liquidity, or a fee-yield collapse should take priority over waiting for uncertain incentives.
For SOL-WW3, an exit review is warranted if TVL falls from $358K, volume remains around $13K, or the scanner's CRITICAL condition persists. A sharp WW3 move, worsening execution liquidity, or a fee-yield collapse should take priority over waiting for uncertain incentives.
There is no reliable break-even estimate because recent impermanent-loss history is not reported and trading volume is only $13K against $358K of TVL. At 3.3% total APR, recovery from a material price-divergence loss could take a long time and may not occur if volume or fees decline.
There is no reliable break-even estimate because recent impermanent-loss history is not reported and trading volume is only $13K against $358K of TVL. At 3.3% total APR, recovery from a material price-divergence loss could take a long time and may not occur if volume or fees decline.
