new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score of 43/100 places this pool below the stated Enter threshold of 40/100 and Hold threshold of 48/100, while the Exit threshold is 34/100. Its live verdict is HOLD, supported by an ai_engine=hold reading but a CRITICAL scanner result and a strong, unopposed EXIT signal. The pool ranks #1436 of 8541 raydium-amm pools, so it is not among the weakest-ranked venues by that measure alone, but the score indicates that current activity and risk conditions do not justify holding it under the framework. The assessment would improve if volume rose materially relative to $100K, fee yield became persistent without incentives, liquidity stabilized, and the scanner no longer produced an unopposed critical signal; a TVL drain or further yield collapse would worsen it.
Computed 2026-10-27 02:42 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$99.72K
Total value locked
$314.06K
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up500.0%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ -54.2%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Wait & Monitor
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Treat the current CRITICAL, unopposed scanner signal as an immediate exit condition rather than waiting for a tick-range rebalance; if entering despite it, set an automated exit when the scanner remains CRITICAL or when 3.15x deteriorates further.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 500.0% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 308.4% | — | — |
| Volume | $314.06K | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $785.16 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 1 GINNAN-SOL pools
by AI Farmer Score
#957 of 93745 on raydium-amm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 2% of all Solana pools
overall rank #1602 of 150817
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the GINNAN-SOL liquidity pool on Raydium AMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing GINNAN and SOL into a shared pool so traders can swap between them. You receive a share of trading fees, but price changes can leave you with a different mix of the two assets and less value than simply holding them separately.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
The reported Total APR of 500.0% decomposes into 308.4% from trading fees and 191.6% from rewards. 62% of yield is fee-derived, so there is no measured reward contribution currently supporting the displayed APR. Reward dependency and the remaining reward schedule are not established, which makes emission decay and incentive continuity uncertain.
shieldRisk Assessment
Seven-day impermanent-loss history is not available, and reported tick-in-range history is also unavailable, so recent price divergence and range utilization cannot be quantified. As a MEMECOIN pool, GINNAN-SOL has elevated exit-timing risk: emission decay, thin liquidity, and a rapid loss of trading activity can leave LPs holding more of the weaker asset while fee income falls. The low volume relative to liquidity means fee generation is limited even before accounting for price movement.
tollGINNAN Context
GINNAN is the memecoin side of this pool, so its price relative to SOL determines how the pool's inventory shifts. Liquidity depth for GINNAN elsewhere is not established here; a sharp GINNAN decline can leave the LP with greater GINNAN exposure, while a sharp rise generally causes the pool to sell GINNAN into SOL and can underperform simply holding both assets.
tollSOL Context
SOL is the reference asset and the deeper-liquidity component of the pair, but this pool's usable depth is still represented by $100K. If SOL moves sharply against GINNAN, arbitrage changes the LP's asset mix; SOL strength can increase the pool's relative GINNAN exposure, while GINNAN strength tends to shift inventory toward SOL.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing GINNAN and SOL into a shared pool so traders can swap between them. You receive a share of trading fees, but price changes can leave you with a different mix of the two assets and less value than simply holding them separately.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- AUPVtmxNccSq5LYSrLRXEjCfAtpfGvDyJfdZCwKyia3G
- Protocol
- Raydium AMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- AMM
- Token A
- GINNAN (GinNabff…)
- Token B
- SOL (So111111…)
- Created
- 5/22/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
13%
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
6%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-amm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The displayed Total APR is 500.0%, consisting of 308.4% in fees and 191.6% in rewards. Because 62% of yield is fee-derived and the reward schedule is not established, further emission decay would mainly remove any reward component rather than explain the current fee income.
The displayed Total APR is 500.0%, consisting of 308.4% in fees and 191.6% in rewards. Because 62% of yield is fee-derived and the reward schedule is not established, further emission decay would mainly remove any reward component rather than explain the current fee income.
The pool would be left with its fee-only component of 308.4% if trading activity continues. Since the current reward component is 191.6%, incentive expiry does not currently represent a measured source of additional yield, but lower participation could reduce volume and fees.
The pool would be left with its fee-only component of 308.4% if trading activity continues. Since the current reward component is 191.6%, incentive expiry does not currently represent a measured source of additional yield, but lower participation could reduce volume and fees.
Risk is high because GINNAN can move sharply, liquidity can thin quickly, and the pool is primarily a low-volume swap venue with a 3.15x ratio. Seven-day impermanent-loss and range-use history are unavailable, so recent loss exposure cannot be estimated from those records.
Risk is high because GINNAN can move sharply, liquidity can thin quickly, and the pool is primarily a low-volume swap venue with a 3.15x ratio. Seven-day impermanent-loss and range-use history are unavailable, so recent loss exposure cannot be estimated from those records.
For this pool, the current HOLD verdict and unopposed CRITICAL scanner signal are already an exit reference. An LP should also reassess when trading volume falls relative to $100K, when liquidity drains, or when GINNAN's price trend leaves the position concentrated in the weaker asset.
For this pool, the current HOLD verdict and unopposed CRITICAL scanner signal are already an exit reference. An LP should also reassess when trading volume falls relative to $100K, when liquidity drains, or when GINNAN's price trend leaves the position concentrated in the weaker asset.
There is no reliable break-even estimate because seven-day impermanent-loss history is unavailable and the fee-only return is 308.4%. Fees would need to accumulate long enough to offset the position's price divergence, and the pool's 3.15x activity level may make that recovery slow.
There is no reliable break-even estimate because seven-day impermanent-loss history is unavailable and the fee-only return is 308.4%. Fees would need to accumulate long enough to offset the position's price divergence, and the pool's 3.15x activity level may make that recovery slow.
