new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score is 40/100, with Enter at 35/100, Hold at 47/100, and Exit at 34/100; the live verdict is HOLD. That places SOL-LUIGI at #2192 of 18146 raydium-amm pools and indicates that the scanner's CRITICAL assessment and unopposed strong EXIT signal outweigh the ai_engine hold output. The assessment would improve only if sustained volume increased fee generation, liquidity stabilized, and the critical scanner condition cleared; a TVL drain or further yield collapse would reinforce the exit case.
Computed 2026-10-22 11:06 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$124.78K
Total value locked
$2.11K
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up1.4%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ -0.9%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Wait & Monitor
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
If entering, avoid a passive wide-range position: use a narrow range only with active monitoring, and set an automatic exit for a persistent TVL drain, further deterioration in 0.02x, or continued scanner-critical status.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 1.4% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 1.4% | — | — |
| Volume | $2.11K | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $5.28 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 7 SOL-Luigi pools
by AI Farmer Score
#1583 of 90613 on raydium-amm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 3% of all Solana pools
overall rank #3875 of 147092
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the SOL-Luigi liquidity pool on Raydium AMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and LUIGI into a shared pool so traders can swap between them, while you receive a share of trading fees. If one token changes price much more than the other, your withdrawal may contain less value than simply holding the two tokens separately.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
Yield decomposes into 1.4% from trading fees and 0.0% from rewards. 99% of the reported yield is fee-derived, so the return depends on actual swap activity rather than emissions. Reward dependency is not established, and no reliable reward-expiry horizon is provided.
shieldRisk Assessment
Recent seven-day impermanent-loss and tick-range readings are not available, so realized divergence loss and range utilization cannot be assessed from the supplied data. As a MEMECOIN pool, SOL-LUIGI carries token-price, liquidity, and emission-decay risk; if incentives appear, their value can decline quickly, making exit timing more important than a static APR. Low volume also means fees may not compensate for adverse price movement.
tollSOL Context
SOL is the base asset in this pair and generally has substantially deeper liquidity across Solana than a memecoin counterpart. If SOL moves sharply against LUIGI, the pool rebalances toward the asset that has underperformed, leaving the LP with more of that asset and exposing the position to divergence loss. SOL's broader liquidity can support swaps, but it does not remove pair-specific risk.
tollLuigi Context
LUIGI is the memecoin side of the pair, with liquidity and demand that may be concentrated in this pool or a small set of venues. A sharp LUIGI repricing, thin order flow, or declining attention can increase divergence loss and reduce fee generation. Emission decay or incentive withdrawal would make exit timing more important because trading fees are already the only reported source of yield.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and LUIGI into a shared pool so traders can swap between them, while you receive a share of trading fees. If one token changes price much more than the other, your withdrawal may contain less value than simply holding the two tokens separately.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- AWcXGpmBGvhyZgWE4rEfSTFoDgHHrHa12fhyjqBvqeUL
- Protocol
- Raydium AMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- AMM
- Token A
- SOL (So111111…)
- Token B
- Luigi (5XyKkFaJ…)
- Created
- 4/22/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
18%
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
6%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-amm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The reported reward component is 0.0%, while fee income is 1.4% and total APR is 1.4%. Because the pool is a MEMECOIN pool and reward dependency is unknown, any future emissions could decay without being replaced by trading fees.
The reported reward component is 0.0%, while fee income is 1.4% and total APR is 1.4%. Because the pool is a MEMECOIN pool and reward dependency is unknown, any future emissions could decay without being replaced by trading fees.
There is no reported reward contribution beyond 0.0%, so an incentive expiry would leave the pool reliant on 1.4% from swaps. With 99% of yield already fee-derived, the practical effect would be limited unless incentives are later introduced.
There is no reported reward contribution beyond 0.0%, so an incentive expiry would leave the pool reliant on 1.4% from swaps. With 99% of yield already fee-derived, the practical effect would be limited unless incentives are later introduced.
Risk is elevated because SOL has broad market liquidity while LUIGI may have thinner and more event-driven demand. The pool has low activity relative to its liquidity at 0.02x, and unavailable recent IL and range data make the realized loss profile harder to verify.
Risk is elevated because SOL has broad market liquidity while LUIGI may have thinner and more event-driven demand. The pool has low activity relative to its liquidity at 0.02x, and unavailable recent IL and range data make the realized loss profile harder to verify.
For SOL-LUIGI, an exit is more defensible if the scanner remains CRITICAL, TVL drains, volume weakens further, or fee income no longer justifies exposure to LUIGI. The current live verdict is HOLD, with an unopposed strong EXIT signal.
For SOL-LUIGI, an exit is more defensible if the scanner remains CRITICAL, TVL drains, volume weakens further, or fee income no longer justifies exposure to LUIGI. The current live verdict is HOLD, with an unopposed strong EXIT signal.
It cannot be estimated reliably because recent impermanent-loss data is unavailable and volume is low relative to TVL. With fee income at 1.4% and total APR at 1.4%, break-even depends on future trading activity and whether SOL and LUIGI diverge in price.
It cannot be estimated reliably because recent impermanent-loss data is unavailable and volume is low relative to TVL. With fee income at 1.4% and total APR at 1.4%, break-even depends on future trading activity and whether SOL and LUIGI diverge in price.
