new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score of 61/100 produces an Enter score of 57/100, Hold score of 66/100, and Exit score of 18/100, with the live verdict HOLD from ai_engine=hold. Its #41 rank among 2403 raydium-amm pools indicates a relatively favorable position in that tracked set, but it does not remove memecoin, liquidity, or price-divergence risk. The assessment would change if TVL drained materially, fee generation collapsed, volume weakened relative to liquidity, or sustained price divergence made the position difficult to manage.
Computed 2026-07-23 21:17 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$126.92K
Total value locked
$5.78K
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up1.0%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ -43.3%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Wait & Monitor
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Use a deliberately bounded range around the current SOL-LUIGI price and reassess whenever price leaves that range or 1.0% falls below 0.5%; if either occurs alongside declining volume, reduce or close the position rather than waiting for an unverified incentive recovery.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 1.0% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 1.0% | — | — |
| Volume | $5.78K | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $14.45 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#2 of 7 SOL-Luigi pools
by AI Farmer Score
#15850 of 34958 on raydium-amm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 30% of all Solana pools
overall rank #19763 of 66494
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the SOL-Luigi liquidity pool on raydium-amm. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and LUIGI into a shared pool that traders use to swap between them. You earn a share of swap fees, but the pool can leave you holding more of the token that has fallen in price, and LUIGI may be harder to sell than SOL.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
The stated total APR decomposes into 1.0% from swap fees and 0.0% from rewards. 100% of yield comes from trading fees, so there is no current reward stream supporting the quoted APR. Reward dependency is not established; fee returns will therefore vary with trading volume, liquidity, and the relative share of the pool captured by each LP.
shieldRisk Assessment
A seven-day impermanent-loss reading is unavailable, and recent tick-in-range occupancy is also unavailable, so recent range efficiency cannot be assessed from these metrics. As a MEMECOIN pool, SOL-LUIGI is exposed to sharp price divergence between SOL and LUIGI, which can create both impermanent loss and adverse inventory concentration. Any future emissions would be subject to decay, and exit timing matters because reduced incentives or falling liquidity can make a position harder to unwind without price impact.
tollSOL Context
SOL is the established asset in this pair and has substantially deeper liquidity across Solana markets than a typical memecoin. If SOL rallies or falls while LUIGI does not move proportionally, the AMM rebalances the position toward the weaker-performing asset, affecting the LP's inventory and impermanent loss.
tollLuigi Context
LUIGI is the memecoin side of the pair, so its liquidity and price discovery are likely more dependent on this pool and other relatively narrow venues than SOL's. A sharp LUIGI move can produce large inventory changes for LPs, while a collapse in LUIGI demand can reduce both exit liquidity and fee generation.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and LUIGI into a shared pool that traders use to swap between them. You earn a share of swap fees, but the pool can leave you holding more of the token that has fallen in price, and LUIGI may be harder to sell than SOL.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- AWcXGpmBGvhyZgWE4rEfSTFoDgHHrHa12fhyjqBvqeUL
- Protocol
- raydium-amm
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- AMM
- Token A
- SOL (So111111…)
- Token B
- Luigi (5XyKkFaJ…)
- Created
- 4/22/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
open_in_newView all raydium-amm pools →By Protocol
hubAll raydium-amm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The current reward-only APR is 0.0%, so the stated 1.0% APR is currently fee-based rather than emission-based. If rewards are added later, emission decay would reduce that reward component while 1.0% would still depend on trading activity.
The current reward-only APR is 0.0%, so the stated 1.0% APR is currently fee-based rather than emission-based. If rewards are added later, emission decay would reduce that reward component while 1.0% would still depend on trading activity.
Because the current reward-only APR is 0.0% and 100% of yield is fee-funded, expiration would not remove the present reward contribution, but any future incentive program would disappear. After expiration, returns would rely on 1.0%, and lower incentives could reduce liquidity and increase exit slippage.
Because the current reward-only APR is 0.0% and 100% of yield is fee-funded, expiration would not remove the present reward contribution, but any future incentive program would disappear. After expiration, returns would rely on 1.0%, and lower incentives could reduce liquidity and increase exit slippage.
Risk is high relative to a major-asset pair because LUIGI can diverge sharply from SOL, and a memecoin's trading demand can fall quickly. The pool's fee-funded 1.0% APR does not protect against price loss, inventory imbalance, or reduced liquidity.
Risk is high relative to a major-asset pair because LUIGI can diverge sharply from SOL, and a memecoin's trading demand can fall quickly. The pool's fee-funded 1.0% APR does not protect against price loss, inventory imbalance, or reduced liquidity.
For this pool, reassess when price leaves your chosen range, 1.0% falls materially, or 0.05x declines as trading demand weakens. A persistent TVL drain or a sharp deterioration in LUIGI liquidity is a stronger exit signal than APR alone.
For this pool, reassess when price leaves your chosen range, 1.0% falls materially, or 0.05x declines as trading demand weakens. A persistent TVL drain or a sharp deterioration in LUIGI liquidity is a stronger exit signal than APR alone.
There is no reliable fixed break-even period because recent seven-day impermanent-loss data is unavailable and fee income changes with volume and TVL. At 1.0% APR, a simple static estimate would take roughly 100 divided by the APR percentage in years to recover a 100% loss, but actual break-even depends on price divergence, compounding, and future fees.
There is no reliable fixed break-even period because recent seven-day impermanent-loss data is unavailable and fee income changes with volume and TVL. At 1.0% APR, a simple static estimate would take roughly 100 divided by the APR percentage in years to recover a 100% loss, but actual break-even depends on price divergence, compounding, and future fees.
