Wealthville Score
Verdict AVOID · 59% confidence
new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
A Wealthville Score of 19/100 places this pool below the Enter threshold of 10/100 and the Hold threshold of 30/100, while the Exit threshold is 60/100. The live verdict is AVOID: ai_engine=hold is outweighed by scanner=CRITICAL and a strong, unopposed EXIT signal. Its rank of #1436 of 8541 raydium-amm pools indicates a relatively weak position within the tracked pool set, consistent with low activity and memecoin-specific exit risk. A sustained increase in organic volume, deeper TVL, improved liquidity persistence, and a less severe scanner result could change the assessment; a TVL drain, further volume contraction, or yield collapse would reinforce it.
Computed 2026-09-05 20:37 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$49.77K
Total value locked
$1.27K
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up4.1%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ -8.8%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Avoid
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
If entering, use a small allocation and a deliberately broad range until reliable tick data is available; set an exit trigger for any continued scanner CRITICAL status, further TVL deterioration, or a sustained Vol/TVL ratio below 0.03x rather than waiting for emissions or fees to recover.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 4.1% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 4.0% | — | — |
| Volume | $1.27K | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $3.18 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 1 SOL-Alpaca pools
by AI Farmer Score
#3919 of 61707 on raydium-amm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 8% of all Solana pools
overall rank #7784 of 107256
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the SOL-Alpaca liquidity pool on Raydium AMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and ALPACA into a shared trading pool so other users can swap between them. You receive a share of trading fees, but the value of your deposit can fall if the two tokens move differently, and the pool may be harder to exit when ALPACA activity or liquidity declines.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
The yield decomposes into 4.0% from trading fees and 0.1% from rewards, with 98% of yield sourced from fees. Reward dependency cannot be established from the available pool record, and no time-bound reward schedule is documented. If trading activity remains at its current level, the fee component is the relevant basis for estimating future APR; any added emissions would be supplementary rather than the current source of yield.
shieldRisk Assessment
The available record does not establish recent impermanent-loss history or the share of time that the position stayed in range, so those risks cannot be quantified from the stated data. As a MEMECOIN pool, SOL-ALPACA carries elevated token-specific volatility and liquidity risk, while any future emissions could decay and change the economics quickly. Exit timing matters because low-volume memecoin pools can become difficult to unwind when attention, liquidity, or incentives decline.
tollSOL Context
SOL is the relatively established asset in this pair and has materially deeper liquidity across Solana markets than ALPACA. SOL price movements change the pair's relative price and can create impermanent loss for the LP even when SOL itself remains liquid elsewhere; its broader market liquidity may, however, make the SOL leg easier to hedge or unwind.
tollAlpaca Context
ALPACA is the idiosyncratic memecoin leg and should be evaluated for liquidity depth outside this pool rather than assumed to have SOL-like exit liquidity. A sharp ALPACA move, widening market spreads, or falling external liquidity can increase price divergence, impair rebalancing, and make the LP's effective exposure materially riskier than the fee rate suggests.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and ALPACA into a shared trading pool so other users can swap between them. You receive a share of trading fees, but the value of your deposit can fall if the two tokens move differently, and the pool may be harder to exit when ALPACA activity or liquidity declines.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- AmzJQtcJfxqNZeRkhGr4B9uSWj5Mtb3N5DHah5zbMRiz
- Protocol
- Raydium AMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- AMM
- Token A
- SOL (So111111…)
- Token B
- Alpaca (FfgtU4bM…)
- Created
- 4/22/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
8%
APR
50%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-amm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The current APR is split between 4.0% in fees and 0.1% in rewards, so the stated yield is currently fee-led rather than emission-led. If incentives are introduced and later decay, the reward component would fall while fee income would still depend on trading volume.
The current APR is split between 4.0% in fees and 0.1% in rewards, so the stated yield is currently fee-led rather than emission-led. If incentives are introduced and later decay, the reward component would fall while fee income would still depend on trading volume.
A reward component would disappear and APR could fall toward 4.0%, but the current record does not document a live reward schedule and 0.1% is the stated reward component. With 98% of yield sourced from fees, post-incentive economics would depend mainly on whether trading volume improves.
A reward component would disappear and APR could fall toward 4.0%, but the current record does not document a live reward schedule and 0.1% is the stated reward component. With 98% of yield sourced from fees, post-incentive economics would depend mainly on whether trading volume improves.
The main risks are ALPACA price volatility, divergence between SOL and ALPACA, shallow exit liquidity, and declining attention or emissions. The pool's $50K TVL and 0.03x Vol/TVL indicate limited current activity, while the scanner's CRITICAL status and AVOID verdict add to the risk case.
The main risks are ALPACA price volatility, divergence between SOL and ALPACA, shallow exit liquidity, and declining attention or emissions. The pool's $50K TVL and 0.03x Vol/TVL indicate limited current activity, while the scanner's CRITICAL status and AVOID verdict add to the risk case.
For SOL-ALPACA, predefined triggers should include a persistent CRITICAL scanner result, falling TVL, weaker trading volume, or deterioration in ALPACA's external liquidity. The current AVOID verdict and unopposed EXIT signal favor acting on those conditions early rather than relying on 4.1% APR to compensate for a worsening market.
For SOL-ALPACA, predefined triggers should include a persistent CRITICAL scanner result, falling TVL, weaker trading volume, or deterioration in ALPACA's external liquidity. The current AVOID verdict and unopposed EXIT signal favor acting on those conditions early rather than relying on 4.1% APR to compensate for a worsening market.
There is no defensible fixed break-even period because recent impermanent-loss history and range coverage are not established for this pool. At 4.1% total APR, recovery depends on future fee volume, the size of any price divergence, and whether the position remains withdrawable at usable liquidity.
There is no defensible fixed break-even period because recent impermanent-loss history and range coverage are not established for this pool. At 4.1% total APR, recovery depends on future fee volume, the size of any price divergence, and whether the position remains withdrawable at usable liquidity.
