USDC-FWDIon Raydium CLMMCLMMHigh Yield
- Chain
- Solana
- TVL
- TVL $52.83K
- APR
- 209.9% APR
- 24h Volume
- $19.06K 24h vol
- Fee tier
- 1.00% fee
- Pool address
- AzYwttRB…2s2A · observed 2026-10-26
new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The 51/100 Wealthville Score places USDC-FWDI in a middle position: the 46/100 Enter score is weaker than the 58/100 Hold score, while the 23/100 Exit score is substantially lower, producing the live HOLD verdict from the ai_engine=hold driver. Its #237 of 9963 ranking among raydium-clmm pools indicates a relatively strong position within the tracked set, but not a guarantee of persistence because the pool has only $53K in liquidity and its yield depends on trading fees. A material TVL drain, collapse in fee APR, sharp reduction in volume, or worsening FWDI exit liquidity would change the assessment; sustained fee generation without those deteriorations would support the current hold view.
Computed 2026-10-26 19:34 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$52.83K
Total value locked
$19.06K
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up209.9%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ 87.6%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Wait & Monitor
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Set alerts at both tick-range boundaries and withdraw or recenter when price exits the range; also use a TVL drain or sustained weakening in the 0.36x ratio as an exit review trigger rather than leaving capital passively deployed.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 209.9% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 113.3% | — | — |
| Volume | $19.06K | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $191.35 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 3 USDC-FWDI pools
by AI Farmer Score
#633 of 19497 on raydium-clmm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 4% of all Solana pools
overall rank #5065 of 148664
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the USDC-FWDI liquidity pool on Raydium CLMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing USDC and FWDI into a shared trading pool and receiving a portion of swap fees. Your holdings can shift toward one token as FWDI's price moves, and you may receive less value than simply holding both tokens if the price changes sharply.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
The displayed APR decomposes into 113.3% from trading fees and 96.6% from rewards. 54% is attributed to trading fees, so the current yield depends on continued swap activity rather than an emissions schedule. Reward dependency is not established, and there is no stated reward-duration estimate to support an emissions-based forecast.
shieldRisk Assessment
Seven-day impermanent-loss and tick-in-range history are not reported in the supplied metrics, so recent price-path damage and range utilization cannot be quantified from this data sheet. As a MEMECOIN pool, FWDI adds substantial token-price, liquidity, and exit-slippage risk relative to a stablecoin pair. Emission decay is not currently the main risk because the displayed reward component is zero, but exit timing still matters: a fall in trading activity or FWDI liquidity can reduce fee income while making withdrawal more costly.
tollUSDC Context
USDC is the stable reference asset in this pair and generally has deeper liquidity across Solana than FWDI. If USDC remains near its intended value, FWDI price movement drives most of the pool's rebalancing and impermanent-loss exposure; a USDC depeg would add a separate risk.
tollFWDI Context
FWDI is the volatile memecoin side of the pair, so its price movement determines much of the position's inventory shift and impermanent-loss exposure. Its liquidity depth outside this pool should be treated as less certain than USDC's, which can increase slippage during an exit. A sharp FWDI repricing can also move the position outside its selected concentrated-liquidity range.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing USDC and FWDI into a shared trading pool and receiving a portion of swap fees. Your holdings can shift toward one token as FWDI's price moves, and you may receive less value than simply holding both tokens if the price changes sharply.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- AzYwttRBkfp3R5tpUHMgcFPWEM8VQJ5WGQP1XoK22s2A
- Protocol
- Raydium CLMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- Concentrated Liquidity (CLMM)
- Token A
- USDC (EPjFWdd5…)
- Token B
- FWDI (FWDtiB5f…)
- Created
- 9/18/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
1%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-clmm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The current reward component is 96.6%, while the displayed total APR is 209.9% and 54% comes from fees. Emission decay therefore does not currently explain the pool's yield, but any future reward program would decline as emissions decay and should not be treated as permanent APR.
The current reward component is 96.6%, while the displayed total APR is 209.9% and 54% comes from fees. Emission decay therefore does not currently explain the pool's yield, but any future reward program would decline as emissions decay and should not be treated as permanent APR.
The supplied figures already show 96.6% in reward APR, so there is no displayed incentive component to remove from the current total. After any future incentives end, income would depend on trading fees, currently shown as 113.3%, and could fall if volume declines.
The supplied figures already show 96.6% in reward APR, so there is no displayed incentive component to remove from the current total. After any future incentives end, income would depend on trading fees, currently shown as 113.3%, and could fall if volume declines.
Risk is high relative to a stablecoin pair because FWDI can move sharply, concentrated liquidity can leave its active range, and the pool has only $53K against $19K of daily volume. The 0.36x ratio describes current turnover, not guaranteed exit liquidity or protection from impermanent loss.
Risk is high relative to a stablecoin pair because FWDI can move sharply, concentrated liquidity can leave its active range, and the pool has only $53K against $19K of daily volume. The 0.36x ratio describes current turnover, not guaranteed exit liquidity or protection from impermanent loss.
Review an exit when FWDI leaves your tick range, when pool TVL falls materially below $53K, or when fee-generating volume weakens enough that 113.3% is no longer adequate compensation for the token and liquidity risks. A worsening ability to sell FWDI without substantial slippage is also a direct exit signal.
Review an exit when FWDI leaves your tick range, when pool TVL falls materially below $53K, or when fee-generating volume weakens enough that 113.3% is no longer adequate compensation for the token and liquidity risks. A worsening ability to sell FWDI without substantial slippage is also a direct exit signal.
There is no reliable fixed break-even period because recent impermanent-loss history is not reported and fee income changes with volume and range placement. Break-even occurs only when accumulated fees at approximately 113.3% offset the position's actual impermanent loss, and the displayed annualized rate should not be extrapolated unchanged.
There is no reliable fixed break-even period because recent impermanent-loss history is not reported and fee income changes with volume and range placement. Break-even occurs only when accumulated fees at approximately 113.3% offset the position's actual impermanent loss, and the displayed annualized rate should not be extrapolated unchanged.
