SOL-PENGUon Raydium CLMMCLMMActive
- Chain
- Solana
- TVL
- TVL $24.87K
- APR
- 15.7% APR
- 24h Volume
- $31.74K 24h vol
- Fee tier
- 0.05% fee
- Pool address
- B4Vwozy1…MhUV · observed 2026-10-08
new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score is 47/100, with Enter at 41/100, Hold at 54/100, and Exit at 27/100. The live verdict is HOLD, driven by ai_engine=hold, placing this pool at #1499 of 8415 raydium-clmm pools rather than among the strongest-ranked alternatives. The assessment would weaken if TVL drains, volume falls, or fee generation collapses; it would improve if liquidity and sustained fee activity increased without a corresponding rise in price and range risk.
Computed 2026-10-08 00:35 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$24.87K
Total value locked
$31.74K
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up15.7%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ 10.5%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Wait & Monitor
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Use a monitored range rather than a set-and-forget position: rebalance when price approaches either boundary, and exit if pool TVL or trading activity contracts materially enough that fees no longer justify the remaining memecoin exposure.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 15.7% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 14.6% | — | — |
| Volume | $31.74K | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $15.87 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#4 of 26 SOL-PENGU pools
by AI Farmer Score
#527 of 18470 on raydium-clmm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 3% of all Solana pools
overall rank #3699 of 132693
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the SOL-PENGU liquidity pool on Raydium CLMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and PENGU into a trading pool so other users can swap between them. You receive a share of trading fees, but your holdings can become uneven and may be worth less than simply holding both tokens if their prices move sharply relative to each other.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
Yield decomposes into fee-only APR of 14.6% and reward-only APR of 1.1%. 93% means current yield is fully sourced from trading fees, so returns depend on continued swap activity and the pool's liquidity position rather than a farm subsidy. Reward duration cannot be established from the available pool data.
shieldRisk Assessment
Recent impermanent-loss history and tick-in-range history are not available, so historical price divergence and range utilization cannot be quantified. As a MEMECOIN pool, SOL-PENGU is exposed to abrupt PENGU price moves, liquidity withdrawal, and volume decay; emission decay is not currently an active return source, but any future incentives would require checking their schedule before relying on them. Exit timing should be based on falling volume, shrinking TVL, or sustained price movement toward a range boundary.
tollSOL Context
SOL is the deeper-liquidity asset in this pair and is traded across many Solana venues, which generally makes its external price easier to reference. For this LP, a sharp SOL move relative to PENGU can push the position toward one-sided inventory and increase range-management pressure.
tollPENGU Context
PENGU is the memecoin leg and is likely to have more fragmented, sentiment-driven liquidity than SOL outside this pool. A rapid PENGU repricing can generate fee volume while also increasing inventory imbalance and impermanent-loss exposure for the LP.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and PENGU into a trading pool so other users can swap between them. You receive a share of trading fees, but your holdings can become uneven and may be worth less than simply holding both tokens if their prices move sharply relative to each other.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- B4Vwozy1FGtp8SELXSXydWSzavPUGnJ77DURV2k4MhUV
- Protocol
- Raydium CLMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- Concentrated Liquidity (CLMM)
- Token A
- SOL (So111111…)
- Token B
- PENGU (2zMMhcVQ…)
- Created
- 4/20/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
1%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-clmm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The current reward-only APR is 1.1%, so the quoted return is not presently supported by farm emissions. If rewards are added later, emission decay could reduce that component while fee-only APR of 14.6% would still depend on trading volume.
The current reward-only APR is 1.1%, so the quoted return is not presently supported by farm emissions. If rewards are added later, emission decay could reduce that component while fee-only APR of 14.6% would still depend on trading volume.
At the current configuration, reward-only APR is 1.1%, so there is no stated farm component to lose. Trading fees represented by 14.6% remain the relevant return source, but they can decline if volume or liquidity falls.
At the current configuration, reward-only APR is 1.1%, so there is no stated farm component to lose. Trading fees represented by 14.6% remain the relevant return source, but they can decline if volume or liquidity falls.
Risk is elevated because PENGU can move sharply against SOL, while the pool has TVL of $25K and a volume-to-TVL ratio of 1.28x. High turnover may produce fees, but it does not remove price divergence, liquidity-withdrawal, or one-sided-inventory risk.
Risk is elevated because PENGU can move sharply against SOL, while the pool has TVL of $25K and a volume-to-TVL ratio of 1.28x. High turnover may produce fees, but it does not remove price divergence, liquidity-withdrawal, or one-sided-inventory risk.
For SOL-PENGU, consider exiting when trading activity and fee generation weaken, TVL contracts, or price approaches a range boundary without a clear case for rebalancing. Do not wait for a nominal incentive end date when the pool's return is primarily fee-based.
For SOL-PENGU, consider exiting when trading activity and fee generation weaken, TVL contracts, or price approaches a range boundary without a clear case for rebalancing. Do not wait for a nominal incentive end date when the pool's return is primarily fee-based.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history and range occupancy data are unavailable. Fees at 14.6% may offset price divergence over time, but the result depends on future volume, SOL-PENGU price movement, and how actively the position is managed.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history and range occupancy data are unavailable. Fees at 14.6% may offset price divergence over time, but the result depends on future volume, SOL-PENGU price movement, and how actively the position is managed.
