new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score of 48/100 places this pool below the stated Enter threshold of 41/100, with Hold at 57/100 and Exit at 23/100; the live verdict is HOLD. Ranked #1544 of 24532 raydium-amm pools, it is being penalized by the combination of high risk at 51/100, weak yield, and an automated hold signal rather than by reward dependence alone. The assessment would improve only with sustained increases in trading activity and fee yield, deeper liquidity, or lower measured risk; a TVL drain, further volume deterioration, or fee-yield collapse would worsen it.
Computed 2026-10-27 08:48 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$292.94K
Total value locked
$5.30K
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up1.7%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ -1.5%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Wait & Monitor
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Treat this as a fee-monitoring position rather than an incentive position: enter only with an exit plan, then close or materially reduce exposure if 0.02x weakens from its current level, TVL begins draining, or INC's price move makes the position materially one-sided. Recheck pool activity before adding capital instead of assuming the current 1.7% will persist.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 1.7% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 1.7% | — | — |
| Volume | $5.30K | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $13.24 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 1 INC-SOL pools
by AI Farmer Score
#13018 of 93745 on raydium-amm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 13% of all Solana pools
overall rank #18757 of 150817
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the INC-SOL liquidity pool on Raydium AMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing INC and SOL into the pool so other users can trade between them. You receive a share of trading fees, but your final mix and value can differ from what you deposited if INC and SOL move differently, and leaving may be difficult if the pool is thin.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
The pool's yield decomposes into 1.7% from trading fees and 0.0% from rewards, with fee sustainability at 99%. Reward dependency is not established, and no active reward duration is available; the stated APR therefore should not be treated as a durable emission stream. If incentives are introduced later, emission decay and expiry would reduce the reward component unless trading volume increases.
shieldRisk Assessment
Recent impermanent-loss history and the share of liquidity in range are not available, so this pool does not provide a measured basis for estimating either exposure. As a MEMECOIN pool, INC-SOL is exposed to sharp INC price moves, thin liquidity, and exit slippage relative to deeper Solana pairs. Emission decay is an additional family-specific risk when incentives exist: an LP should not assume rewards persist, and exit timing matters if INC loses demand or liquidity drains.
tollINC Context
INC is the memecoin side of this pair and its price movement directly determines the LP's relative inventory after trades. Liquidity depth for INC outside this pool is not established here, so a sharp move or weak external demand can make rebalancing and exiting more costly. A sustained INC rally or selloff against SOL can increase divergence-related LP losses even when fees accrue.
tollSOL Context
SOL is the established base asset in the pair and provides the reference price against which INC trades. SOL generally has broader market liquidity across Solana than a memecoin, but that does not remove the depth and execution risks inside this specific pool. SOL's price movement changes the dollar value of both deposited assets and can compound divergence from the initial deposit mix.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing INC and SOL into the pool so other users can trade between them. You receive a share of trading fees, but your final mix and value can differ from what you deposited if INC and SOL move differently, and leaving may be difficult if the pool is thin.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- B6R72jxHaBU1kaJ9chKRyV82pWnUFjZiJZpMZ61hC17M
- Protocol
- Raydium AMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- AMM
- Token A
- INC (Fe5c469A…)
- Token B
- SOL (So111111…)
- Created
- 4/22/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
13%
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
6%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-amm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The current APR is split between 1.7% in fees and 0.0% in rewards, so the recorded yield is fee-funded rather than dependent on active emissions. If rewards are introduced, emission decay would reduce the reward portion over time unless trading fees replace it.
The current APR is split between 1.7% in fees and 0.0% in rewards, so the recorded yield is fee-funded rather than dependent on active emissions. If rewards are introduced, emission decay would reduce the reward portion over time unless trading fees replace it.
Because the current reward component is 0.0%, expiry of any added farm incentive would have little or no direct effect on the stated fee component of 1.7%. The position would then rely on 1.7%, which varies with trading volume and may not cover impermanent loss or exit costs.
Because the current reward component is 0.0%, expiry of any added farm incentive would have little or no direct effect on the stated fee component of 1.7%. The position would then rely on 1.7%, which varies with trading volume and may not cover impermanent loss or exit costs.
Risk is elevated because INC can move sharply against SOL and the pool has $293K in liquidity against $5K in recent volume, producing a 0.02x ratio. The pool's risk score is 51/100, and unavailable recent IL and range data leave the historical loss profile unmeasured.
Risk is elevated because INC can move sharply against SOL and the pool has $293K in liquidity against $5K in recent volume, producing a 0.02x ratio. The pool's risk score is 51/100, and unavailable recent IL and range data leave the historical loss profile unmeasured.
For INC-SOL, consider exiting when pool TVL falls, 0.02x deteriorates, INC loses external liquidity, or the pair becomes heavily one-sided after a sharp price move. A persistent HOLD verdict is an additional signal to reassess rather than add capital.
For INC-SOL, consider exiting when pool TVL falls, 0.02x deteriorates, INC loses external liquidity, or the pair becomes heavily one-sided after a sharp price move. A persistent HOLD verdict is an additional signal to reassess rather than add capital.
No defensible break-even period can be calculated because recent impermanent-loss data is unavailable and fees vary with volume. As a rough fee-only reference, recovering a loss would take approximately one year divided by 1.7% before compounding, price changes, and exit costs; actual recovery could be longer or fail to occur.
No defensible break-even period can be calculated because recent impermanent-loss data is unavailable and fees vary with volume. As a rough fee-only reference, recovering a loss would take approximately one year divided by 1.7% before compounding, price changes, and exit costs; actual recovery could be longer or fail to occur.
