new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score is 17/100, with Enter at 15/100, Hold at 20/100, Exit at 80/100, and live verdict EXIT; the stated verdict driver is ai_engine=hold. That places this pool at rank #1313 of 18146 raydium-amm pools: the assessment is neither a broad buy signal nor an automatic exit, but a conditional hold based on fee generation and current pool conditions. A sustained TVL drain, collapse in fee APR, weaker volume, or worsening ability to exit would change the assessment toward exit; durable volume growth and deeper liquidity could improve it.
Computed 2026-10-22 17:12 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$218.32K
Total value locked
$478.57
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up1.3%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ -10.8%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Avoid
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Enter with a deliberately conservative tick range and monitor whether the position remains in range; rebalance when it leaves that range, and treat a sustained decline in volume relative to 0.00x or a material TVL drain as an exit signal rather than waiting for emissions or rewards to improve.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 1.3% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 1.3% | — | — |
| Volume | $478.57 | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $7.18 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 1 SOL-PROJECT89 pools
by AI Farmer Score
#4368 of 90613 on raydium-amm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 7% of all Solana pools
overall rank #8883 of 147092
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the SOL-PROJECT89 liquidity pool on Raydium AMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and PROJECT89 into a shared pool so other users can swap between them, while you receive part of the trading fees. If their prices move apart, you may end up holding a different mix of the two tokens and could earn less than simply holding them separately.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
The APR decomposes into 1.3% from trading fees and 0.0% from rewards, with 99%. There is no current reward contribution to cushion a drop in trading activity, so the quoted APR should be treated as variable fee revenue rather than a fixed return. Reward dependency is not established, and no reward-duration estimate is available.
shieldRisk Assessment
A seven-day impermanent-loss reading is unavailable, so recent divergence between SOL and PROJECT89 cannot be quantified from the supplied history. Tick-in-range history is also unavailable, leaving concentration and out-of-range exposure unresolved. As a MEMECOIN pool, liquidity and trading interest can contract quickly; emission decay or incentive changes may further reduce exit liquidity and fee generation, making exit timing more important than in deeper, established pairs.
tollSOL Context
SOL is the established asset in this pair and generally has deeper liquidity elsewhere on Solana than this pool. If SOL moves sharply relative to PROJECT89, the pool's rebalancing mechanism can leave an LP with more of the asset that has underperformed, creating impermanent-loss exposure even when fee income is positive.
tollPROJECT89 Context
PROJECT89 is the memecoin-side asset, so its liquidity outside this pool should be verified rather than assumed. A rapid PROJECT89 price move, thin external liquidity, or fading market attention can increase price divergence, widen practical exit costs, and reduce the volume supporting this pool's fee APR.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and PROJECT89 into a shared pool so other users can swap between them, while you receive part of the trading fees. If their prices move apart, you may end up holding a different mix of the two tokens and could earn less than simply holding them separately.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- BEF62G6qC4ekRXhJNWCyvcmYVhY8N8PpsS8ELXNRHejh
- Protocol
- Raydium AMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- AMM
- Token A
- SOL (So111111…)
- Token B
- PROJECT89 (CJjraBae…)
- Created
- 4/22/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
13%
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
3%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-amm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The current reward component is 0.0%, so the quoted 1.3% is currently based on 1.3% in trading fees rather than emissions. If incentives are introduced later, emission decay would reduce that reward component over time and leave fee income as the remaining support.
The current reward component is 0.0%, so the quoted 1.3% is currently based on 1.3% in trading fees rather than emissions. If incentives are introduced later, emission decay would reduce that reward component over time and leave fee income as the remaining support.
There is no current reward contribution, with 0.0% attributed to rewards, so an incentive expiry would not remove a present reward stream. The remaining return would depend on 1.3% in fees, which can fall if trading volume or liquidity declines.
There is no current reward contribution, with 0.0% attributed to rewards, so an incentive expiry would not remove a present reward stream. The remaining return would depend on 1.3% in fees, which can fall if trading volume or liquidity declines.
Risk is elevated because PROJECT89 can move sharply relative to SOL and may have limited liquidity outside this pool. The pool's fee income is 1.3%, but that does not offset all impermanent-loss, price, or exit-liquidity risk.
Risk is elevated because PROJECT89 can move sharply relative to SOL and may have limited liquidity outside this pool. The pool's fee income is 1.3%, but that does not offset all impermanent-loss, price, or exit-liquidity risk.
For this pool, consider exiting if TVL or trading activity deteriorates materially, if your position remains outside its chosen range, or if fee income no longer compensates for the exposure to PROJECT89. A weakening fee-only return from 1.3% is more relevant here than waiting for rewards, since 0.0% is currently the reward component.
For this pool, consider exiting if TVL or trading activity deteriorates materially, if your position remains outside its chosen range, or if fee income no longer compensates for the exposure to PROJECT89. A weakening fee-only return from 1.3% is more relevant here than waiting for rewards, since 0.0% is currently the reward component.
No fixed break-even time can be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history is unavailable and fee income changes with volume. Compare cumulative fees, currently represented by 1.3%, with the actual divergence loss on your position; 1.3% should not be treated as a guaranteed recovery period.
No fixed break-even time can be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history is unavailable and fee income changes with volume. Compare cumulative fees, currently represented by 1.3%, with the actual divergence loss on your position; 1.3% should not be treated as a guaranteed recovery period.
