new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The 40/100 Wealthville Score, with Enter at 36/100, Hold at 46/100, and Exit at 35/100, supports a conditional HOLD rather than a clear new-entry signal. The live HOLD is driven by ai_engine=hold, and the pool ranks #834 of 8541 raydium-amm pools, placing it above many listed pools but not among the strongest alternatives. The assessment would change if TVL drained, fee APR collapsed, trading volume materially improved, or persistent liquidity and range data showed stronger execution conditions.
Computed 2026-09-06 14:49 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$303.24K
Total value locked
$63.41K
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up57.3%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ -39.4%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Wait & Monitor
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Use a deliberately bounded tick range and set a rebalance or exit rule for a sustained move outside that range; if volume remains too low for fee income to compensate for the resulting inventory imbalance, close the position rather than waiting for an unconfirmed incentive program.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 57.3% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 45.3% | — | — |
| Volume | $63.41K | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $951.15 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 1 SOL-PROJECT89 pools
by AI Farmer Score
#1533 of 61707 on raydium-amm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 4% of all Solana pools
overall rank #3715 of 107256
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the SOL-PROJECT89 liquidity pool on Raydium AMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and PROJECT89 into a shared trading pool. Traders pay fees that are distributed to liquidity providers, but price changes can leave you with more of the weaker token and less of the stronger one.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
Yield decomposes into 45.3% fee APR and 12.0% reward APR, with 79% of yield sourced from trading fees. Reward dependency is not established, and no time-bound reward duration is available; therefore, the stated APR should be evaluated as a function of fee volume rather than assumed emissions.
shieldRisk Assessment
Seven-day impermanent-loss data is unavailable, as is the seven-day percentage of time the position remained in range, so recent loss and range behavior cannot be quantified from the supplied record. As a MEMECOIN pool, SOL-PROJECT89 carries sharp price-gap, liquidity-withdrawal, and token-specific failure risks; emission decay is not currently contributing to APR, but any future incentives could alter exit timing, while fee income may not compensate for rapid relative-price divergence.
tollSOL Context
SOL is the base asset in this pool and generally has deeper liquidity across Solana than a single memecoin pair. If SOL rises or falls materially relative to PROJECT89, the AMM rebalances the position toward the weaker-performing asset, making SOL price action a direct driver of LP inventory and impermanent-loss exposure.
tollPROJECT89 Context
PROJECT89 is the pool-specific memecoin leg, so its liquidity depth and price discovery should not be inferred from SOL's broader market liquidity. A sharp PROJECT89 repricing, thin external liquidity, or trading cessation can leave the LP holding more PROJECT89 while fee generation falls.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and PROJECT89 into a shared trading pool. Traders pay fees that are distributed to liquidity providers, but price changes can leave you with more of the weaker token and less of the stronger one.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- BEF62G6qC4ekRXhJNWCyvcmYVhY8N8PpsS8ELXNRHejh
- Protocol
- Raydium AMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- AMM
- Token A
- SOL (So111111…)
- Token B
- PROJECT89 (CJjraBae…)
- Created
- 4/22/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
8%
APR
50%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-amm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The current APR is composed of 45.3% in fees and 12.0% in rewards, so there is no reported reward component for emission decay to reduce at present. Because reward dependency is unknown, any future emissions should be treated as variable rather than as a durable part of 57.3%.
The current APR is composed of 45.3% in fees and 12.0% in rewards, so there is no reported reward component for emission decay to reduce at present. Because reward dependency is unknown, any future emissions should be treated as variable rather than as a durable part of 57.3%.
The currently reported reward APR is 12.0%, so the stated 57.3% already depends on 45.3% rather than active reward payments. If incentives are introduced and later expire, the remaining return would depend on trading fees and the 79% fee-sustainability reading.
The currently reported reward APR is 12.0%, so the stated 57.3% already depends on 45.3% rather than active reward payments. If incentives are introduced and later expire, the remaining return would depend on trading fees and the 79% fee-sustainability reading.
Risk is high relative to a major-asset pair because PROJECT89 can move sharply, lose liquidity, or become difficult to exit while SOL remains liquid elsewhere. For this pool, seven-day impermanent-loss and in-range history are unavailable, so recent price and range risk cannot be measured from the supplied data.
Risk is high relative to a major-asset pair because PROJECT89 can move sharply, lose liquidity, or become difficult to exit while SOL remains liquid elsewhere. For this pool, seven-day impermanent-loss and in-range history are unavailable, so recent price and range risk cannot be measured from the supplied data.
For SOL-PROJECT89, consider exiting when the position remains outside its chosen range, PROJECT89 liquidity deteriorates, or fee income no longer plausibly offsets inventory risk. A sustained TVL drain or collapse in trading activity would weaken the current HOLD assessment.
For SOL-PROJECT89, consider exiting when the position remains outside its chosen range, PROJECT89 liquidity deteriorates, or fee income no longer plausibly offsets inventory risk. A sustained TVL drain or collapse in trading activity would weaken the current HOLD assessment.
No defensible break-even period can be calculated because seven-day impermanent-loss history is unavailable and future fee volume is uncertain. The relevant income rate is 45.3%, but actual break-even depends on SOL-PROJECT89 price divergence, time in range, and whether trading activity persists.
No defensible break-even period can be calculated because seven-day impermanent-loss history is unavailable and future fee volume is uncertain. The relevant income rate is 45.3%, but actual break-even depends on SOL-PROJECT89 price divergence, time in range, and whether trading activity persists.
