new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score is 40/100, below the Enter score of 35/100 and the Hold score of 47/100, while the Exit score is 34/100. That places the pool in a concrete exit-oriented state, consistent with the live verdict HOLD, the CRITICAL scanner result, and an unopposed EXIT signal, even though the AI engine reports hold. Its rank of #535 among 1834 meteora-damm-v2 pools indicates that many listed pools score differently, but does not remove the pool-specific liquidity concern. A sustained increase in volume relative to TVL, a non-critical scanner result, or more durable fee generation could improve the assessment; a TVL drain or collapse in fee APR would worsen it.
Computed 2026-11-10 22:56 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$32.64K
Total value locked
$308.88
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up3.3%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ 1.4%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Wait & Monitor
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Do not enter while HOLD remains EXIT and the scanner remains CRITICAL; if already providing liquidity, use a narrow range only with an automated exit when the verdict stays negative through the next review or 0.01x remains negligible.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 3.3% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 3.3% | — | — |
| Volume | $308.88 | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $2.48 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#2 of 3 MM-SOL pools
by AI Farmer Score
#368 of 2627 on meteora-damm-v2
by AI Farmer Score
Top 3% of all Solana pools
overall rank #4580 of 157883
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the MM-SOL liquidity pool on Meteora DAMM v2. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing MM and SOL into a shared pool so other users can trade between them. You receive a share of trading fees, but price changes can leave you with more of the weaker asset, and this pool currently has very little trading activity relative to its liquidity.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
Yield decomposes into 3.3% from trading fees and 0.1% from rewards. 98% of yield is fee-derived, so the stated APR depends primarily on traders rather than emissions. Reward dependency and the duration of any incentive program are not established; the reward component should therefore not be assumed to persist.
shieldRisk Assessment
A usable recent impermanent-loss history and tick-in-range history are not available, so realized price divergence and range utilization cannot be quantified from these metrics. As a MEMECOIN pool, MM-SOL is exposed to abrupt token repricing, shallow liquidity, and exit slippage. Emission decay is an additional family-specific concern if incentives are introduced, making exit timing important when trading activity or incentives weaken.
tollMM Context
MM is the memecoin side of this pair and is likely to drive most of the pool's price divergence risk. Its liquidity depth outside this pool is not established by the supplied metrics; a sharp MM move against SOL can leave an LP holding more of the depreciating asset while fee income remains limited.
tollSOL Context
SOL is the base asset against which MM is priced in this pool. SOL's broader market liquidity can help price discovery, but SOL volatility still changes the relative price of MM and can create inventory imbalance for LPs when the pair moves quickly.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing MM and SOL into a shared pool so other users can trade between them. You receive a share of trading fees, but price changes can leave you with more of the weaker asset, and this pool currently has very little trading activity relative to its liquidity.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- BFQZ6WUR6hpXg6j1fSAcCgJAnmdgCyT6Q71ghz54QoAk
- Protocol
- Meteora DAMM v2
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- AMM
- Token A
- MM (Ax8PSfCX…)
- Token B
- SOL (So111111…)
- Created
- 7/29/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
24%
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
15%
By Protocol
hubAll meteora-damm-v2 poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The current reward-only component is 0.1%, while fee income is 3.3%. If emissions decay, the reward portion can fall further, leaving the APR increasingly dependent on trading fees and the pool's limited activity.
The current reward-only component is 0.1%, while fee income is 3.3%. If emissions decay, the reward portion can fall further, leaving the APR increasingly dependent on trading fees and the pool's limited activity.
Because the current reward component is 0.1%, incentive expiry would not remove the main stated source of yield if fees remain at 3.3%. It could still reduce liquidity and trading activity, weakening fee generation and making exit timing more important.
Because the current reward component is 0.1%, incentive expiry would not remove the main stated source of yield if fees remain at 3.3%. It could still reduce liquidity and trading activity, weakening fee generation and making exit timing more important.
Risk is elevated because MM can reprice sharply against SOL, while $33K of liquidity and a 0.01x volume-to-liquidity ratio provide limited evidence of active fee generation. Recent impermanent-loss and range-utilization history is not available for a quantified comparison.
Risk is elevated because MM can reprice sharply against SOL, while $33K of liquidity and a 0.01x volume-to-liquidity ratio provide limited evidence of active fee generation. Recent impermanent-loss and range-utilization history is not available for a quantified comparison.
For this pool, an exit is especially defensible while HOLD remains EXIT, the scanner remains CRITICAL, or volume stays negligible relative to $33K. Also consider exiting before a known incentive reduction if fee activity is not replacing the rewards.
For this pool, an exit is especially defensible while HOLD remains EXIT, the scanner remains CRITICAL, or volume stays negligible relative to $33K. Also consider exiting before a known incentive reduction if fee activity is not replacing the rewards.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history and future MM-SOL price behavior are unavailable. The relevant offset is the fee stream of 3.3%, but thin activity means actual recovery can differ materially from the headline APR.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history and future MM-SOL price behavior are unavailable. The relevant offset is the fee stream of 3.3%, but thin activity means actual recovery can differ materially from the headline APR.
