new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The 53/100 Wealthville Score places SOL-ALT in a middle assessment rather than a clear entry setup: the Enter score is 51/100, Hold is 55/100, and Exit is 28/100, with the live verdict at HOLD. The stated verdict driver is ai_engine=hold. Its #563 of 18146 ranking among raydium-amm pools indicates it is above many listed pools but does not remove the pool-specific concerns created by $61K TVL and a 0.01x Vol/TVL ratio. The assessment would weaken if TVL drained, volume fell further, or fee income collapsed; it would improve if sustained organic volume increased fee APR without relying on emissions.
Computed 2026-09-24 01:32 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$61.32K
Total value locked
$847.91
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up4.6%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ 0.4%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Wait & Monitor
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Enter only with a predefined exit trigger: reduce or close the position if SOL/ALT moves 10% away from the entry relationship without a corresponding increase in pool volume, or if the displayed fee APR falls materially below 4.6%. Use a wider range than a major-asset pair if range controls are available, because ALT volatility can otherwise leave liquidity inactive or concentrated in one asset.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 4.6% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 4.5% | — | — |
| Volume | $847.91 | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $2.12 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 5 SOL-ALT pools
by AI Farmer Score
#1 of 71780 on raydium-amm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 1% of all Solana pools
overall rank #1 of 122041
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the SOL-ALT liquidity pool on Raydium AMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and ALT into the pool so other users can trade between them, while you receive part of the trading fees. Your result depends on those fees and on how the two prices move; a large change in ALT can leave you with more of the weaker asset than you started with.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
The displayed return decomposes into 4.5% from trading fees and 0.1% from rewards. 98% of the yield is attributed to fees, so the current APR is tied to swap activity rather than a stated reward schedule. Reward duration and dependency are not established, so projected returns should not assume that any incentive component will persist.
shieldRisk Assessment
A seven-day impermanent-loss reading and recent in-range history are not established for this pool, so the available data cannot quantify how price divergence has affected LPs or how consistently liquidity has been active. As a MEMECOIN pool, SOL-ALT also carries token-specific volatility, shallow-liquidity, and exit-timing risk: emission decay or weak trading can reduce the reason to remain after entering, while a sharp move in either asset can leave the LP exposed to the weaker performer.
tollSOL Context
SOL is the established network asset in this pair and generally has materially deeper liquidity across Solana venues than a single memecoin pool. SOL strength or weakness changes the SOL/ALT price relationship; a large move can increase the LP's inventory imbalance and make fee income insufficient to offset divergence.
tollALT Context
ALT is the memecoin leg, so its liquidity and price discovery are likely more concentrated than SOL's and may depend heavily on this pool and a limited set of venues. A rapid ALT repricing can create impermanent loss relative to simply holding SOL and ALT, while thin exit liquidity can increase slippage when the position is closed.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and ALT into the pool so other users can trade between them, while you receive part of the trading fees. Your result depends on those fees and on how the two prices move; a large change in ALT can leave you with more of the weaker asset than you started with.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- BJGbPyDARmcgJ7CRwm623nrjF2gpLkpsSwWNsjxubTpG
- Protocol
- Raydium AMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- AMM
- Token A
- SOL (So111111…)
- Token B
- ALT (Cdq1WR1d…)
- Created
- 4/22/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
224%
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
23%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-amm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The current reward component is 0.1%, while fee income is 4.5% and 98% of the displayed yield comes from fees. Because reward duration is not established, emission decay cannot be projected as a fixed timetable; any reduction in incentives would matter less to the current displayed APR than a decline in trading activity.
The current reward component is 0.1%, while fee income is 4.5% and 98% of the displayed yield comes from fees. Because reward duration is not established, emission decay cannot be projected as a fixed timetable; any reduction in incentives would matter less to the current displayed APR than a decline in trading activity.
The reward portion would fall away if incentives end, but the current reward component is 0.1%. Fee income would remain linked to swaps, so the pool's ongoing return would depend on 4.5% and whether trading volume supports it.
The reward portion would fall away if incentives end, but the current reward component is 0.1%. Fee income would remain linked to swaps, so the pool's ongoing return would depend on 4.5% and whether trading volume supports it.
Risk is elevated because ALT can move sharply, have thinner exit liquidity, and diverge substantially from SOL. The pool's $61K TVL and 0.01x Vol/TVL ratio also indicate that current trading activity is limited relative to liquidity, while recent impermanent-loss and range-history measurements are not established.
Risk is elevated because ALT can move sharply, have thinner exit liquidity, and diverge substantially from SOL. The pool's $61K TVL and 0.01x Vol/TVL ratio also indicate that current trading activity is limited relative to liquidity, while recent impermanent-loss and range-history measurements are not established.
Use a predefined signal rather than waiting for a recovery: consider exiting if SOL/ALT moves 10% from the entry relationship without stronger volume, if fee APR drops materially below 4.6%, or if ALT liquidity becomes difficult to exit. Emission decay is another reason to reassess before the position is supported only by fees.
Use a predefined signal rather than waiting for a recovery: consider exiting if SOL/ALT moves 10% from the entry relationship without stronger volume, if fee APR drops materially below 4.6%, or if ALT liquidity becomes difficult to exit. Emission decay is another reason to reassess before the position is supported only by fees.
There is no reliable fixed break-even time because recent impermanent loss is not established and fee accrual changes with volume. Ignoring price changes and compounding, fees accrue at 4.5% annually, so recovery requires cumulative fees at least equal to the position's actual loss from price divergence.
There is no reliable fixed break-even time because recent impermanent loss is not established and fee accrual changes with volume. Ignoring price changes and compounding, fees accrue at 4.5% annually, so recovery requires cumulative fees at least equal to the position's actual loss from price divergence.
