Wealthville Score
Verdict EXIT · 70% confidence
new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score of 5/100 combines an Enter score of 7/100, Hold score of 3/100, and Exit score of 98/100, producing a live verdict of EXIT from the ai_engine=hold driver. Ranked #92 of 889 meteora-damm-v2 pools, this is a relatively strong placement within that protocol set, but it does not remove memecoin or liquidity risk. The assessment would change if TVL drained, trading volume and fee APR collapsed, the displayed yield became reward-dependent, or sustained MILKERS price movement produced unfavorable LP inventory.
Computed 2026-09-04 20:32 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$35.29K
Total value locked
$80.93
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up1.3%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ -10.2%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Avoid
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Use a range you can monitor frequently, and exit or reset it if MILKERS moves outside that range or if rolling volume and fee accrual deteriorate materially; do not leave a passive position open solely because the displayed APR remains high.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 1.3% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 1.3% | — | — |
| Volume | $80.93 | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $1.29 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 1 MILKERS-SOL pools
by AI Farmer Score
#575 of 1856 on meteora-damm-v2
by AI Farmer Score
Top 18% of all Solana pools
overall rank #18322 of 107256
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the MILKERS-SOL liquidity pool on Meteora DAMM v2. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing MILKERS and SOL into a shared pool so traders can swap between them. You receive a share of trading fees, but your final holdings can be worth less than simply holding both tokens if their prices move differently, especially with a memecoin pair.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
The stated yield decomposes into 1.3% fee-only APR and 0.0% reward-only APR, with 99% of yield supported by trading fees. Reward dependency is not established, so the fee component is the clearer basis for assessing ongoing returns; neither component is guaranteed, and realized fees depend on trading activity and LP share.
shieldRisk Assessment
A seven-day impermanent-loss history is not reported, and recent tick-in-range coverage is unavailable, so short-term loss experience and range efficiency cannot be verified from these metrics. As a MEMECOIN pool, MILKERS-SOL carries concentrated token-price and liquidity risk; emission decay is also relevant if incentives are later introduced, making exit timing important when trading activity or MILKERS demand weakens.
tollMILKERS Context
MILKERS is the memecoin side of this pair and supplies the pool's primary idiosyncratic price risk. Its liquidity depth outside this pool is not established by the available metrics; a sharp MILKERS move can leave the LP with a larger share of the weaker-performing asset and can increase execution costs when exiting.
tollSOL Context
SOL is the liquid base asset paired against MILKERS and is likely to have deeper external markets than the memecoin. If SOL rises or falls materially relative to MILKERS, arbitrage changes the pool's inventory and can convert price divergence into impermanent loss for the LP.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing MILKERS and SOL into a shared pool so traders can swap between them. You receive a share of trading fees, but your final holdings can be worth less than simply holding both tokens if their prices move differently, especially with a memecoin pair.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- BLteSSx2Cf6NK7YCywJuMcQTbcRkwfJe4bkYxMvNsZCJ
- Protocol
- Meteora DAMM v2
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- AMM
- Token A
- MILKERS (14oz7CJQ…)
- Token B
- SOL (So111111…)
- Created
- 8/7/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
0%
APR
2%
APR
10%
APR
3%
By Protocol
hubAll meteora-damm-v2 poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The current display shows 1.3% total APR, composed of 1.3% fee APR and 0.0% reward APR. Because the reward component is currently 0.0%, emission decay would mainly matter if future incentives were added or if the reward portion changed; fee income still depends on trading volume.
The current display shows 1.3% total APR, composed of 1.3% fee APR and 0.0% reward APR. Because the reward component is currently 0.0%, emission decay would mainly matter if future incentives were added or if the reward portion changed; fee income still depends on trading volume.
If incentives expire, the reward portion would fall toward zero and the position would rely on 1.3% from trading fees, rather than 1.3% total APR. That can make the pool less suitable if fee generation does not compensate for price divergence, rebalancing costs, and liquidity risk.
If incentives expire, the reward portion would fall toward zero and the position would rely on 1.3% from trading fees, rather than 1.3% total APR. That can make the pool less suitable if fee generation does not compensate for price divergence, rebalancing costs, and liquidity risk.
Risk is elevated because MILKERS can move sharply and may have thinner liquidity than SOL. The pool has $35K TVL and a 0.00x volume-to-TVL ratio, while recent impermanent-loss and range-coverage data are unavailable, so the realized risk cannot be inferred from a seven-day history.
Risk is elevated because MILKERS can move sharply and may have thinner liquidity than SOL. The pool has $35K TVL and a 0.00x volume-to-TVL ratio, while recent impermanent-loss and range-coverage data are unavailable, so the realized risk cannot be inferred from a seven-day history.
For MILKERS-SOL, consider exiting when MILKERS leaves your active range, when fee accrual weakens materially, or when pool TVL and trading activity fall enough to make execution risk unacceptable. A worsening fee outlook matters more here because the stated yield is supported by trading fees rather than confirmed ongoing rewards.
For MILKERS-SOL, consider exiting when MILKERS leaves your active range, when fee accrual weakens materially, or when pool TVL and trading activity fall enough to make execution risk unacceptable. A worsening fee outlook matters more here because the stated yield is supported by trading fees rather than confirmed ongoing rewards.
There is no defensible fixed break-even period because recent impermanent-loss history is unavailable and fee income changes with trading activity. Compare your accumulated share of 1.3% fee APR with the position's actual mark-to-market loss; 1.3% is an annualized display, not a guaranteed recovery schedule.
There is no defensible fixed break-even period because recent impermanent-loss history is unavailable and fee income changes with trading activity. Compare your accumulated share of 1.3% fee APR with the position's actual mark-to-market loss; 1.3% is an annualized display, not a guaranteed recovery schedule.
