MANLET-ANSEMon Raydium CLMMCLMMHigh Yield
- Chain
- Solana
- TVL
- TVL $46.45K
- APR
- 221.2% APR
- 24h Volume
- $5.02K 24h vol
- Fee tier
- 4.00% fee
- Pool address
- BNEeD53W…N7eo · observed 2026-10-23
new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score of 41/100 with Enter 37/100, Hold 47/100, and Exit 34/100 supports the live verdict HOLD, not a clear entry signal. The ai_engine=hold driver is consistent with a fee-funded pool that has measurable activity but limited depth and insufficient history for stronger conviction; it is ranked #1696 of 9963 raydium-clmm pools. The assessment would improve with sustained volume, deeper TVL, and evidence that fees persist without liquidity erosion, and would worsen with a TVL drain, collapsing volume/TVL, or a material decline in 116.9%.
Computed 2026-10-23 15:47 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$46.45K
Total value locked
$5.02K
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up221.2%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ 269.5%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Wait & Monitor
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Use a deliberately narrow initial tick range, monitor whether price remains inside it, and rebalance when price sustains a move outside the active range; exit if volume no longer supports the displayed fee-only APR of 116.9% or if pool liquidity begins to drain.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 221.2% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 116.9% | — | — |
| Volume | $5.02K | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $202.66 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 1 MANLET-ANSEM pools
by AI Farmer Score
#692 of 19264 on raydium-clmm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 3% of all Solana pools
overall rank #3373 of 147092
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the MANLET-ANSEM liquidity pool on Raydium CLMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing MANLET and ANSEM into a trading pool so other users can swap between them, while you receive a share of trading fees. If the two token prices move apart, you may end up holding more of the weaker token and have less value than if you had simply held both.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
The displayed total APR of 221.2% decomposes into 116.9% from trading fees and 104.3% from rewards. 53% of yield comes from trading fees, so realized returns depend on continued swap activity rather than a reward program. A reward-duration estimate is not established, and the absence of a reward component means emission decay is not currently the main APR risk.
shieldRisk Assessment
Seven-day impermanent-loss data and seven-day tick-in-range history are unavailable, so recent price divergence and range utilization cannot be quantified from the supplied metrics. As a MEMECOIN pool, MANLET-ANSEM is exposed to abrupt price moves, token-specific liquidity loss, and rapid changes in trading demand. If emissions are introduced later, decay could reduce the return and make exit timing more important; without an established lifecycle, an LP should treat fee conditions and liquidity withdrawal as the primary exit signals.
tollMANLET Context
MANLET is one side of this concentrated-liquidity position, so an LP holds exposure to its price relative to ANSEM while supplying both assets for swaps. The supplied data do not establish MANLET's liquidity depth elsewhere; a sharp MANLET move can create inventory imbalance and increase the chance that the LP holds more of the weaker asset.
tollANSEM Context
ANSEM is the other side of the pair and determines the relative-price exposure of the position alongside MANLET. Its liquidity depth elsewhere is not established in the supplied data, so an ANSEM price move or venue-specific liquidity gap can affect both rebalancing quality and the LP's exit.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing MANLET and ANSEM into a trading pool so other users can swap between them, while you receive a share of trading fees. If the two token prices move apart, you may end up holding more of the weaker token and have less value than if you had simply held both.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- BNEeD53WYjj8qfHEZtbUXyc1eL1cQv5HLb5H6yKgN7eo
- Protocol
- Raydium CLMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- Concentrated Liquidity (CLMM)
- Token A
- MANLET (HxQhDGYq…)
- Token B
- ANSEM (9cRCn9rG…)
- Created
- 8/7/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
1%
APR
0%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-clmm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The current reward-only APR is 104.3%, so emission decay is not presently the source of the displayed 221.2% APR. Future emissions could still change the mix, but the current return depends on 116.9% in trading fees and 53% fee sustainability.
The current reward-only APR is 104.3%, so emission decay is not presently the source of the displayed 221.2% APR. Future emissions could still change the mix, but the current return depends on 116.9% in trading fees and 53% fee sustainability.
There is no current reward contribution beyond 104.3%, so an incentive expiry would not remove a meaningful displayed reward component at present. The remaining return would depend on trading fees of 116.9%, which can fall if volume or liquidity declines.
There is no current reward contribution beyond 104.3%, so an incentive expiry would not remove a meaningful displayed reward component at present. The remaining return would depend on trading fees of 116.9%, which can fall if volume or liquidity declines.
Risk is elevated because both assets are memecoins and their relative prices can change abruptly, while the pool has limited depth indicated by $46K. Seven-day impermanent-loss and range-utilization history is unavailable, so recent loss from price divergence cannot be assessed from these metrics.
Risk is elevated because both assets are memecoins and their relative prices can change abruptly, while the pool has limited depth indicated by $46K. Seven-day impermanent-loss and range-utilization history is unavailable, so recent loss from price divergence cannot be assessed from these metrics.
Consider exiting when pool liquidity drains, swap activity weakens enough to undermine 116.9%, or price remains outside your active range. Because the lifecycle is not established, do not assume the current 221.2% will persist through a change in token attention or liquidity.
Consider exiting when pool liquidity drains, swap activity weakens enough to undermine 116.9%, or price remains outside your active range. Because the lifecycle is not established, do not assume the current 221.2% will persist through a change in token attention or liquidity.
A reliable break-even time cannot be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history is unavailable and 116.9% is an annualized, variable estimate rather than a guaranteed cash flow. Break-even requires realized fees to offset the position's actual price divergence, with 53% indicating that fees—not rewards—are the relevant offset.
A reliable break-even time cannot be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history is unavailable and 116.9% is an annualized, variable estimate rather than a guaranteed cash flow. Break-even requires realized fees to offset the position's actual price divergence, with 53% indicating that fees—not rewards—are the relevant offset.
