MANLET-ANSEMon Raydium CLMMCLMMHigh Yield
- Chain
- Solana
- TVL
- TVL $77.31K
- APR
- 500.0% APR
- 24h Volume
- $8.78K 24h vol
- Fee tier
- 4.00% fee
- Pool address
- BNEeD53W…N7eo · observed 2026-10-09
Wealthville Score
Verdict AVOID · 60% confidence
new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score is 19/100, with Enter at 10/100, Hold at 30/100, and Exit at 60/100; the live verdict is AVOID and the stated verdict driver is ai_engine=hold. Its rank of #1462 of 8415 raydium-clmm pools places it above many listed pools but does not remove the specific risks of small liquidity, concentrated range exposure, and fee dependence. The assessment would weaken if TVL drains, volume contracts, or the fee-derived APR collapses; it could strengthen if liquidity and sustained trading volume increase without a corresponding rise in price divergence or range-management losses.
Computed 2026-10-09 08:32 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$77.31K
Total value locked
$8.78K
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up500.0%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ 197.1%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Avoid
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Enter with a monitored range centered on the current MANLET-ANSEM price, and rebalance or exit when price approaches an outer boundary or when volume falls enough that realized fees no longer justify the range-management and memecoin exposure.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 500.0% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 186.7% | — | — |
| Volume | $8.78K | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $360.07 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 1 MANLET-ANSEM pools
by AI Farmer Score
#850 of 18470 on raydium-clmm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 6% of all Solana pools
overall rank #7082 of 132693
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the MANLET-ANSEM liquidity pool on Raydium CLMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing MANLET and ANSEM into a price range so traders can swap between them, while you receive part of the trading fees. You can end up holding more of the token that falls in relative value, and the fee rate can decline if trading slows.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
Displayed yield is decomposed into 186.7% from trading fees and 313.3% from rewards. 37% of yield is attributed to fees, so the quoted APR is exposed to changes in volume, spreads, and the amount of liquidity competing for fees rather than to a scheduled emissions program. Reward dependency is not established beyond the displayed reward component.
shieldRisk Assessment
A seven-day impermanent-loss reading is not available, and recent tick-in-range coverage is also unavailable, so neither recent price divergence nor range utilization can be quantified from these metrics. As a MEMECOIN pool, MANLET and ANSEM can move sharply or diverge from one another, producing concentrated-liquidity losses and requiring active exit timing. Any future emissions would also be subject to decay; with no quantified reward component currently displayed, the primary ongoing risk is that trading activity falls before fee income offsets price divergence and rebalancing costs.
tollMANLET Context
MANLET is one side of this concentrated-liquidity position, so the LP holds exposure to MANLET and ANSEM across a selected price range rather than simply holding either token. Liquidity depth for MANLET outside this pool is not established by the supplied metrics; thinner external liquidity would make sharp price moves and exits more difficult. A MANLET price move relative to ANSEM can push the position toward one asset and increase divergence loss.
tollANSEM Context
ANSEM is the counter-asset paired with MANLET, and the LP's inventory changes as ANSEM's relative price moves through the selected range. The supplied metrics do not establish ANSEM's liquidity depth elsewhere, so external exit capacity should be checked separately. A rapid ANSEM move can exhaust the active range and leave the position concentrated in one token.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing MANLET and ANSEM into a price range so traders can swap between them, while you receive part of the trading fees. You can end up holding more of the token that falls in relative value, and the fee rate can decline if trading slows.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- BNEeD53WYjj8qfHEZtbUXyc1eL1cQv5HLb5H6yKgN7eo
- Protocol
- Raydium CLMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- Concentrated Liquidity (CLMM)
- Token A
- MANLET (HxQhDGYq…)
- Token B
- ANSEM (9cRCn9rG…)
- Created
- 8/7/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
1%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-clmm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The displayed reward component is 313.3%, while the fee component is 186.7% and 37% of yield comes from fees. If emissions are introduced or reduced later, that reward change would alter total APR, but current quoted yield is primarily fee-derived.
The displayed reward component is 313.3%, while the fee component is 186.7% and 37% of yield comes from fees. If emissions are introduced or reduced later, that reward change would alter total APR, but current quoted yield is primarily fee-derived.
Because the displayed reward APR is 313.3%, there is no quantified reward stream currently adding to the quoted return. If incentives are later added and then expire, the remaining return would depend on trading fees, currently represented by 186.7%, and on continued volume.
Because the displayed reward APR is 313.3%, there is no quantified reward stream currently adding to the quoted return. If incentives are later added and then expire, the remaining return would depend on trading fees, currently represented by 186.7%, and on continued volume.
Risk is elevated by memecoin price volatility, uncertain liquidity outside the pool, and the possibility that MANLET and ANSEM diverge sharply. Fees are based on $9K of recent volume against $77K of liquidity, but that activity can decline and does not eliminate concentrated-liquidity losses.
Risk is elevated by memecoin price volatility, uncertain liquidity outside the pool, and the possibility that MANLET and ANSEM diverge sharply. Fees are based on $9K of recent volume against $77K of liquidity, but that activity can decline and does not eliminate concentrated-liquidity losses.
Consider exiting or rebalancing when price approaches the edge of your range, when pool liquidity or trading volume deteriorates, or when realized fees no longer compensate for price divergence and management costs. For this pool, the displayed fee dependence makes a volume or fee collapse a direct exit signal.
Consider exiting or rebalancing when price approaches the edge of your range, when pool liquidity or trading volume deteriorates, or when realized fees no longer compensate for price divergence and management costs. For this pool, the displayed fee dependence makes a volume or fee collapse a direct exit signal.
A reliable break-even time cannot be estimated because recent impermanent-loss and range-utilization history are unavailable. The relevant comparison is realized fee income, represented by 186.7%, against the position's actual divergence from simply holding MANLET and ANSEM; the displayed APR is not a guaranteed recovery period.
A reliable break-even time cannot be estimated because recent impermanent-loss and range-utilization history are unavailable. The relevant comparison is realized fee income, represented by 186.7%, against the position's actual divergence from simply holding MANLET and ANSEM; the displayed APR is not a guaranteed recovery period.
