new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The 17/100 Wealthville Score, with Enter 15/100, Hold 20/100, and Exit 80/100, places this pool near the exit boundary and produces a live EXIT verdict. Its #1436-of-8541 rank among raydium-amm pools is consistent with a weak relative profile, while the scanner is CRITICAL, the AI engine is hold, and the strong EXIT signal is unopposed. The assessment could improve if TVL and recurring swap volume increased enough to support fee generation and orderly exits; a further TVL drain, collapse in fee yield, or worsening liquidity would reinforce the exit case.
Computed 2026-09-07 10:41 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$31.92K
Total value locked
$34.35
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up0.1%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ -0.5%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Avoid
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Use a deliberately narrow range only with active monitoring, and exit rather than widen the range if TVL drains further or swaps remain absent across several consecutive observations; the current 0.00x ratio does not justify passive range management.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 0.1% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 0.1% | — | — |
| Volume | $34.35 | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $0.09 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 1 SOL-JOKER pools
by AI Farmer Score
#6796 of 65350 on raydium-amm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 11% of all Solana pools
overall rank #11895 of 113637
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the SOL-JOKER liquidity pool on Raydium AMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and JOKER into a shared pool so other users can swap between them, while you receive a share of trading fees. You can lose value if JOKER or SOL moves sharply, and the pool's low activity means those fees may not compensate for that price difference.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
The displayed yield decomposes into 0.1% from trading fees and 0.0% from incentives. 100% of yield comes from fees, so there is no current reward contribution supporting the headline APR. Reward dependency and any emission schedule are not established in the available pool data; if incentives are later added or removed, the reward component would change without improving the underlying swap activity.
shieldRisk Assessment
Recent impermanent-loss history and time spent inside the active price range are not reported, so there is no measured basis for estimating realized IL or range efficiency. As a MEMECOIN pool, JOKER can experience rapid price divergence from SOL, while emissions can decay quickly if incentives appear; exit timing should therefore be based on liquidity, swap activity, and price divergence rather than on a presumed persistent reward stream.
tollSOL Context
SOL is the base asset in this pair and generally has substantially deeper liquidity across Solana markets than JOKER. SOL price movement changes the pool's relative composition: a sustained SOL move against JOKER can increase inventory imbalance and create impermanent loss even when the pool continues to process swaps.
tollJOKER Context
JOKER is the thinner and more speculative side of the pair, with liquidity and price discovery concentrated in a small memecoin market. A sharp JOKER repricing can leave the LP holding more of the depreciating asset, while an abrupt loss of buyers can make exiting the position costly.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and JOKER into a shared pool so other users can swap between them, while you receive a share of trading fees. You can lose value if JOKER or SOL moves sharply, and the pool's low activity means those fees may not compensate for that price difference.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- BSMra1YMo1HVuZQ5JBNdgDna5NYYw3p92NRAXHsrGRpJ
- Protocol
- Raydium AMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- AMM
- Token A
- SOL (So111111…)
- Token B
- JOKER (sFUZ2nfK…)
- Created
- 4/22/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
500%
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
3%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-amm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The current return is split between 0.1% in fees and 0.0% in rewards, so there is no current reward contribution to decay. If emissions are introduced later, their reduction would lower the reward portion while leaving fee income dependent on $34 and $32K.
The current return is split between 0.1% in fees and 0.0% in rewards, so there is no current reward contribution to decay. If emissions are introduced later, their reduction would lower the reward portion while leaving fee income dependent on $34 and $32K.
The displayed reward component is already 0.0%, so removing incentives would not reduce the current fee component of 0.1%. Without stronger swap activity, the pool would remain dependent on its limited trading fees rather than becoming a higher-yield LP venue.
The displayed reward component is already 0.0%, so removing incentives would not reduce the current fee component of 0.1%. Without stronger swap activity, the pool would remain dependent on its limited trading fees rather than becoming a higher-yield LP venue.
Risk is elevated because JOKER can diverge sharply from SOL and the pool has only $32K supporting $34 in recent volume. Recent IL and range data are not available, so the size of realized price-divergence loss cannot be estimated from the supplied history.
Risk is elevated because JOKER can diverge sharply from SOL and the pool has only $32K supporting $34 in recent volume. Recent IL and range data are not available, so the size of realized price-divergence loss cannot be estimated from the supplied history.
For SOL-JOKER, an exit is most defensible when liquidity drains, swap activity stays weak, or JOKER begins a sustained move away from SOL. The current EXIT verdict, CRITICAL scanner result, and unopposed exit signal favor acting on deterioration rather than waiting for an unverified incentive recovery.
For SOL-JOKER, an exit is most defensible when liquidity drains, swap activity stays weak, or JOKER begins a sustained move away from SOL. The current EXIT verdict, CRITICAL scanner result, and unopposed exit signal favor acting on deterioration rather than waiting for an unverified incentive recovery.
There is no defensible break-even estimate because recent IL history and range occupancy are not reported. Ignoring price divergence, gross fee payback would be approximately the initial capital divided by the annual fee yield 0.1%; actual recovery can take longer or never occur if JOKER continues to diverge or liquidity falls.
There is no defensible break-even estimate because recent IL history and range occupancy are not reported. Ignoring price divergence, gross fee payback would be approximately the initial capital divided by the annual fee yield 0.1%; actual recovery can take longer or never occur if JOKER continues to diverge or liquidity falls.
