new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score of 17/100 places this pool below a neutral holding case: Enter is 15/100, Hold is 20/100, and Exit is 80/100, with the live verdict EXIT. The AI engine is hold, but the scanner is CRITICAL and the strong EXIT signal is unopposed, so the score reflects weak pool conditions rather than APR alone. The pool ranks #1710 of 24532 raydium-amm pools. The assessment would improve only with sustained trading volume, stable or growing TVL, clearer incentive data, and removal of the critical scanner condition; a TVL drain or further yield collapse would reinforce the exit case.
Computed 2026-10-27 00:18 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$57.78K
Total value locked
$34.81
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up0.6%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ -3.4%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Avoid
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
If entering, use a narrow range only with a defined rebalance rule: exit rather than add liquidity if the scanner remains CRITICAL and trading activity does not improve, or if the pool's TVL begins draining materially.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 0.6% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 0.6% | — | — |
| Volume | $34.81 | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $0.09 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 2 SOL-$EXPERT pools
by AI Farmer Score
#13309 of 93745 on raydium-amm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 13% of all Solana pools
overall rank #19247 of 150817
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the SOL-$EXPERT liquidity pool on Raydium AMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and $EXPERT into a shared trading pool and receiving a share of trading fees. Your holdings can become more concentrated in whichever token falls in relative value, and the current fee income depends on limited observed trading activity.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
The Total APR of 0.6% decomposes into fee-only APR of 0.6% and reward-only APR of 0.0%. 100% of reported yield is sourced from trading fees. The reward schedule and remaining incentive duration are not established, so the fee component is the relevant basis for assessing persistence.
shieldRisk Assessment
Recent impermanent-loss history and tick-in-range exposure are not reported, so the position's observed sensitivity to price divergence and range placement cannot be quantified. As a MEMECOIN pool, SOL-$EXPERT carries token-specific price and liquidity risk, while emission decay and exit timing matter because incentives may not offset losses or weak fee generation. Low observed trading activity also limits the fee cushion available to LPs.
tollSOL Context
SOL is the pool's established base asset and has substantially deeper liquidity across Solana markets than $EXPERT. SOL price movements relative to $EXPERT change the pool's inventory mix and can create impermanent loss for LPs even when SOL itself remains liquid elsewhere. A sharp SOL move can also make a concentrated position leave its intended range more quickly.
toll$EXPERT Context
$EXPERT is the pool's MEMECOIN-side asset, so its market depth, price discovery, and holder concentration are central to LP risk. A large $EXPERT move against SOL can increase impermanent loss and leave the LP holding more of the weaker asset. Thin external liquidity can make exit timing more important than the quoted APR.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and $EXPERT into a shared trading pool and receiving a share of trading fees. Your holdings can become more concentrated in whichever token falls in relative value, and the current fee income depends on limited observed trading activity.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- BiCLtVkmq6M7R9PJDPX5nE6DaQ7Y5uCun58AQ7PZo2jE
- Protocol
- Raydium AMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- AMM
- Token A
- SOL (So111111…)
- Token B
- $EXPERT (H7VfCzzP…)
- Created
- 5/22/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
13%
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
6%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-amm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The reward component is 0.0%, while the fee component is 0.6%. Since reported yield is entirely fee-sourced at 100%, further emission decay would not currently provide a meaningful offset if trading fees weaken.
The reward component is 0.0%, while the fee component is 0.6%. Since reported yield is entirely fee-sourced at 100%, further emission decay would not currently provide a meaningful offset if trading fees weaken.
The pool would rely on trading fees, represented by 0.6%, rather than emissions. Because 100% already attributes all reported yield to fees, incentive expiry would mainly remove any potential supplement rather than replace the current fee source.
The pool would rely on trading fees, represented by 0.6%, rather than emissions. Because 100% already attributes all reported yield to fees, incentive expiry would mainly remove any potential supplement rather than replace the current fee source.
Risk is high relative to a SOL pair with a more established counter-asset because $EXPERT may have thinner liquidity and larger price moves. This pool also has $58K TVL, $35 24h volume, and a CRITICAL scanner status, which increases concern about exit liquidity and fee persistence.
Risk is high relative to a SOL pair with a more established counter-asset because $EXPERT may have thinner liquidity and larger price moves. This pool also has $58K TVL, $35 24h volume, and a CRITICAL scanner status, which increases concern about exit liquidity and fee persistence.
For this pool, an exit is reasonable if the CRITICAL scanner status persists, TVL drains, or trading activity remains too low to support fees. The current live verdict is EXIT, so waiting for emission-based compensation is not a sufficient exit plan.
For this pool, an exit is reasonable if the CRITICAL scanner status persists, TVL drains, or trading activity remains too low to support fees. The current live verdict is EXIT, so waiting for emission-based compensation is not a sufficient exit plan.
There is no reliable break-even estimate because recent impermanent-loss history is not reported and volume is limited. Fees accrue at 0.6%, but that rate cannot establish recovery time without knowing the size and duration of the LP's price divergence.
There is no reliable break-even estimate because recent impermanent-loss history is not reported and volume is limited. Fees accrue at 0.6%, but that rate cannot establish recovery time without knowing the size and duration of the LP's price divergence.
