PYUSD -USDTon Raydium CLMMCLMM
- Chain
- Solana
- TVL
- TVL $350.27K
- APR
- 4.1% APR
- 24h Volume
- $354.56K 24h vol
- Fee tier
- 0.01% fee
- Pool address
- BrBs4uUA…2DkC · observed 2026-08-23
new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
A Wealthville Score of 57/100 with Enter 53/100, Hold 62/100, and Exit 19/100 indicates a mixed rather than one-directional signal. The live verdict HOLD reflects ai_engine=enter combined with a CRITICAL scanner result and at least one exit source, replacing a prior hard-EXIT outcome with a reduction stance. The pool ranks #801 of 4410 raydium-clmm pools, which places it above many listed pools but does not remove its small-liquidity and MEMECOIN-family risks. A TVL drain, weaker volume, or collapse in 4.1% would worsen the assessment; sustained fee volume, deeper liquidity, and a less severe scanner result would improve it.
Computed 2026-08-23 13:04 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$350.27K
Total value locked
$354.56K
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up4.1%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ 2.6%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Wait & Monitor
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Use a narrow range centered on the current PYUSD-USDT price, review the position whenever price leaves that range, and exit rather than add liquidity if the live verdict changes to EXIT or if volume falls materially below the current 1.01x level.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 4.1% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 4.0% | — | — |
| Volume | $354.56K | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $35.46 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 1 PYUSD -USDT pools
by AI Farmer Score
#254 of 12650 on raydium-clmm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 2% of all Solana pools
overall rank #1428 of 95923
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the PYUSD -USDT liquidity pool on Raydium CLMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing PYUSD and USDT into a shared pool so traders can swap between them, while you receive a portion of trading fees. Your holdings can become uneven if either token moves away from the other, and the stated return depends on trading activity rather than rewards.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
The yield decomposes into 4.0% from trading fees and 0.1% from rewards. 98% of the stated yield comes from fees, and no reward duration is established, so emission decay and future reward contribution cannot be modeled. The fee component therefore depends on continued volume relative to the pool's liquidity rather than on a disclosed incentive schedule.
shieldRisk Assessment
Seven-day impermanent-loss history and tick-in-range occupancy are not available, so recent divergence exposure and range efficiency cannot be verified. As a MEMECOIN-family pool, the relevant risks include rapid volume loss, price dislocation between PYUSD and USDT, and liquidity leaving when speculative activity fades. Exit timing matters because fee yield can fall before an LP can reposition, while any future emissions could decay without offsetting that decline.
tollPYUSD Context
PYUSD is the pool's dollar-denominated side paired against USDT, so its role is to provide a stable-value reference rather than directional exposure by design. This sheet does not establish PYUSD's liquidity depth elsewhere; a loss of external PYUSD liquidity could widen execution prices and increase the chance that the pool's price moves away from the intended dollar relationship. Any PYUSD depeg or sustained price movement changes the inventory mix and can create impermanent loss for the LP.
tollUSDT Context
USDT is the opposing dollar-denominated asset and normally serves as the pool's settlement side for traders. Its external liquidity depth is not established here, so stress in USDT markets could affect arbitrage and the pool's ability to remain near its reference value. A deviation in either asset changes the relative inventory held by the LP and can make fee income insufficient to offset losses from rebalancing.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing PYUSD and USDT into a shared pool so traders can swap between them, while you receive a portion of trading fees. Your holdings can become uneven if either token moves away from the other, and the stated return depends on trading activity rather than rewards.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- BrBs4uUAhndUV7PXEQCUyAVBPCfJxbZykGVUcS2e2DkC
- Protocol
- Raydium CLMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- Concentrated Liquidity (CLMM)
- Token A
- PYUSD (DuXfm3HP…)
- Token B
- USDT (Es9vMFrz…)
- Created
- 6/24/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
1%
APR
0%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-clmm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The current reward-only component is 0.1%, so the stated 4.1% APR is not presently dependent on disclosed emissions. If rewards are introduced later, emission decay would reduce that component while 4.0% would still depend on trading volume.
The current reward-only component is 0.1%, so the stated 4.1% APR is not presently dependent on disclosed emissions. If rewards are introduced later, emission decay would reduce that component while 4.0% would still depend on trading volume.
Because 0.1% is the reward-only APR, expiration would not remove the stated fee component of 4.0%. The remaining return would depend on trading fees, and lower activity could reduce the total APR below 4.1%.
Because 0.1% is the reward-only APR, expiration would not remove the stated fee component of 4.0%. The remaining return would depend on trading fees, and lower activity could reduce the total APR below 4.1%.
The pool is classified as MEMECOIN, has a CRITICAL scanner signal, and has no verified recent impermanent-loss or range-occupancy history in this sheet. That combination makes liquidity depth, depeg risk, and exit timing more important than the fee rate alone.
The pool is classified as MEMECOIN, has a CRITICAL scanner signal, and has no verified recent impermanent-loss or range-occupancy history in this sheet. That combination makes liquidity depth, depeg risk, and exit timing more important than the fee rate alone.
For this pool, review an exit if price leaves your selected range, trading activity weakens materially from the current 1.01x relationship, or the live verdict changes from HOLD to EXIT. A TVL drain or sharp fall in 4.1% is also a reason to reassess rather than wait for emissions.
For this pool, review an exit if price leaves your selected range, trading activity weakens materially from the current 1.01x relationship, or the live verdict changes from HOLD to EXIT. A TVL drain or sharp fall in 4.1% is also a reason to reassess rather than wait for emissions.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because seven-day impermanent-loss data is unavailable and the pool's future volume is uncertain. The relevant comparison is whether ongoing fee income at 4.0% can offset the position's realized divergence loss before liquidity or activity declines.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because seven-day impermanent-loss data is unavailable and the pool's future volume is uncertain. The relevant comparison is whether ongoing fee income at 4.0% can offset the position's realized divergence loss before liquidity or activity declines.
