new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
A Wealthville Score of 17/100 places this pool below the Enter threshold of 15/100 and the Hold threshold of 20/100, while the Exit score is 80/100. The live verdict is EXIT because ai_engine=hold is outweighed by scanner=CRITICAL and an unopposed strong EXIT signal. Its #1436-of-8541 rank among raydium-amm pools indicates a low relative standing, not merely a temporary APR difference. The assessment could improve if sustained volume raises fee generation, liquidity remains intact, and the scanner exits its critical state; a TVL drain, weaker volume, or fee-yield collapse would reinforce the exit case.
Computed 2026-08-24 15:47 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$35.10K
Total value locked
$19.52
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up0.8%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ -12.4%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Avoid
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Use an explicit exit rule rather than waiting for a reward schedule: exit if the scanner remains CRITICAL while 0.00x stays weak or $35K declines, and do not widen or maintain a concentrated range without current range-activity data.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 0.8% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 0.8% | — | — |
| Volume | $19.52 | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $0.05 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 2 SOL-RAT pools
by AI Farmer Score
#4521 of 55835 on raydium-amm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 9% of all Solana pools
overall rank #8623 of 98856
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the SOL-RAT liquidity pool on Raydium AMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and RAT into a shared pool so other users can trade between them, with part of trading fees going to liquidity providers. You can lose value relative to simply holding the tokens if SOL and RAT move substantially differently, and the pool's low activity limits fee generation.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
Total APR decomposes into a fee-only APR of 0.8% and a reward-only APR of 0.0%. Fee sustainability is 100%, so the displayed return depends on trading fees rather than active reward emissions. Reward dependency is not established, and no time-bound reward schedule is available to support an emissions-based holding period.
shieldRisk Assessment
Recent impermanent-loss history and tick-in-range history are not available for this pool, so short-term price divergence and range exposure cannot be quantified from the supplied record. As a MEMECOIN pool, RAT can reprice abruptly and its liquidity can deteriorate faster than that of major Solana assets. Emission decay is also not measurable from a confirmed reward schedule; exit timing should therefore be based on trading activity, liquidity retention, and risk signals rather than assumed future incentives.
tollSOL Context
SOL is the established asset in this pair and generally has deeper liquidity across Solana venues than this pool provides. If SOL appreciates or depreciates materially against RAT, the pool's inventory shifts toward the weaker-performing asset, creating price-divergence exposure for the LP even when fees are accruing.
tollRAT Context
RAT is the memecoin side of the pair, so its liquidity and price discovery are likely more concentrated than SOL's. A sharp RAT move can increase inventory imbalance and withdrawal slippage, while a decline in RAT activity can reduce the fee base supporting this LP.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and RAT into a shared pool so other users can trade between them, with part of trading fees going to liquidity providers. You can lose value relative to simply holding the tokens if SOL and RAT move substantially differently, and the pool's low activity limits fee generation.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- BrNb8tqwwhpdwkVPtPGjCzZuTevcDcWSsJ2AMotfi1uo
- Protocol
- Raydium AMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- AMM
- Token A
- SOL (So111111…)
- Token B
- RAT (3vJenGaG…)
- Created
- 5/22/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
0%
APR
7%
APR
0%
APR
208%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-amm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The current reward-only APR is 0.0%, so the displayed 0.8% is not presently supported by a meaningful reward stream. If emissions are introduced and then decay, the APR would fall unless trading fees increase; fee sustainability is 100%.
The current reward-only APR is 0.0%, so the displayed 0.8% is not presently supported by a meaningful reward stream. If emissions are introduced and then decay, the APR would fall unless trading fees increase; fee sustainability is 100%.
Because 0.0% is the reward-only APR and is currently absent from the displayed return, incentive expiry would not remove a material component of the current 0.8%. The remaining return would depend on 0.8% and the pool's trading volume.
Because 0.0% is the reward-only APR and is currently absent from the displayed return, incentive expiry would not remove a material component of the current 0.8%. The remaining return would depend on 0.8% and the pool's trading volume.
Risk is elevated because RAT can move sharply against SOL and this pool has $35K in liquidity with $20 in 24h volume. The 0.00x ratio indicates limited recent trading activity, while recent impermanent-loss and range-history records are unavailable.
Risk is elevated because RAT can move sharply against SOL and this pool has $35K in liquidity with $20 in 24h volume. The 0.00x ratio indicates limited recent trading activity, while recent impermanent-loss and range-history records are unavailable.
For SOL-RAT, an exit is rational when the scanner remains CRITICAL, liquidity falls from $35K, or fee generation no longer justifies exposure to RAT. The current live verdict is EXIT, so an LP should require evidence of sustained volume and improved risk signals before treating the position as maintainable.
For SOL-RAT, an exit is rational when the scanner remains CRITICAL, liquidity falls from $35K, or fee generation no longer justifies exposure to RAT. The current live verdict is EXIT, so an LP should require evidence of sustained volume and improved risk signals before treating the position as maintainable.
No reliable break-even period can be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history is unavailable and price paths are unknown. At the displayed fee-only APR of 0.8%, gross fee recovery would take approximately the inverse annual rate before accounting for price divergence, withdrawal costs, and changing volume.
No reliable break-even period can be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history is unavailable and price paths are unknown. At the displayed fee-only APR of 0.8%, gross fee recovery would take approximately the inverse annual rate before accounting for price divergence, withdrawal costs, and changing volume.
