SOL-ORDERon Raydium CLMMCLMMActive
- Chain
- Solana
- TVL
- TVL $167.23K
- APR
- 12.8% APR
- 24h Volume
- $29.06K 24h vol
- Fee tier
- 0.25% fee
- Pool address
- BxUigngq…Vwz4 · observed 2026-09-28
new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
A Wealthville Score of 54/100 with Enter 48/100, Hold 61/100, Exit 20/100, and live verdict HOLD indicates a pool assessed as suitable to maintain selectively rather than a clear new-entry opportunity. The ai_engine=hold driver is consistent with a fee-funded pool whose $167K liquidity and 0.17x activity provide usable fee flow but whose memecoin exposure and incomplete range and loss history limit conviction. Its #272 of 8415 raydium-clmm rank places it above most listed pools, but that ranking is not a guarantee of persistence. A TVL drain, collapse in volume, or decline in fee-derived APR would weaken the assessment; sustained volume with stable liquidity would support it.
Computed 2026-09-28 15:27 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$167.23K
Total value locked
$29.06K
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up12.8%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ 7.3%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Wait & Monitor
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Enter with a deliberately narrow range centered on the current SOL-ORDER price, and rebalance when price reaches the outer 20% of that range; exit rather than repeatedly widening the range if 0.17x declines materially or fee income no longer compensates for the pair's price divergence.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 12.8% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 12.1% | — | — |
| Volume | $29.06K | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $72.66 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 2 SOL-ORDER pools
by AI Farmer Score
#717 of 17652 on raydium-clmm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 3% of all Solana pools
overall rank #3630 of 125017
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the SOL-ORDER liquidity pool on Raydium CLMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and ORDER into a shared pool so other users can swap between them. You receive part of the trading fees, but large price differences between SOL and ORDER can leave you with less value than simply holding both assets, and the memecoin may be difficult to sell quickly.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
The APR consists of 12.1% from trading fees and 0.8% from rewards. Fee sustainability is 94%, so the current yield does not rely on a reward program. The reward schedule and remaining duration are not established, which makes the fee component the relevant basis for evaluating ongoing income.
shieldRisk Assessment
Recent impermanent-loss history and the share of time liquidity stayed in range are not reported, so realized loss and range efficiency cannot be quantified from the available record. As a MEMECOIN pool, SOL-ORDER is exposed to sharp price moves, thin or uneven liquidity, and rapid changes in trader demand. Emission decay and exit timing matter: if incentives are introduced and later reduced, or if memecoin attention leaves the pair, fee income may fall before an LP exits.
tollSOL Context
SOL is the established asset in this pair and generally has deeper liquidity across Solana markets than ORDER. SOL price movement relative to ORDER changes the pool's inventory mix and can create impermanent loss for LPs when the two assets diverge, even if SOL itself remains liquid elsewhere.
tollORDER Context
ORDER is the memecoin-side asset and is likely to contribute most of the pair's idiosyncratic volatility and liquidity risk. A rapid ORDER repricing can shift the position toward one asset, increase impermanent-loss exposure, and make exit execution more sensitive to available depth.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and ORDER into a shared pool so other users can swap between them. You receive part of the trading fees, but large price differences between SOL and ORDER can leave you with less value than simply holding both assets, and the memecoin may be difficult to sell quickly.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- BxUigngqxhU8Wapwvck5cavcBbfgE47ETNwLeXnCVwz4
- Protocol
- Raydium CLMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- Concentrated Liquidity (CLMM)
- Token A
- SOL (So111111…)
- Token B
- ORDER (ABt79MkR…)
- Created
- 4/20/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
1%
APR
0%
APR
1%
APR
0%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-clmm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The current APR is split between 12.1% in fees and 0.8% in rewards, with 94% of yield coming from fees. If any future emissions decay, the total APR would move toward the fee-only component unless trading volume rises.
The current APR is split between 12.1% in fees and 0.8% in rewards, with 94% of yield coming from fees. If any future emissions decay, the total APR would move toward the fee-only component unless trading volume rises.
The current reward component is 0.8%, so the stated yield is already fee-led rather than reward-led. Because the reward schedule is not established, an incentive expiry would mainly matter if future rewards are added; in that case, the remaining baseline would be 12.1% from fees.
The current reward component is 0.8%, so the stated yield is already fee-led rather than reward-led. Because the reward schedule is not established, an incentive expiry would mainly matter if future rewards are added; in that case, the remaining baseline would be 12.1% from fees.
Risk is high relative to a pool pairing SOL with a more established asset because ORDER can move sharply or lose liquidity. SOL-ORDER has $167K in liquidity and $29K in 24-hour volume, but the available record does not quantify recent impermanent loss or time spent in range.
Risk is high relative to a pool pairing SOL with a more established asset because ORDER can move sharply or lose liquidity. SOL-ORDER has $167K in liquidity and $29K in 24-hour volume, but the available record does not quantify recent impermanent loss or time spent in range.
Consider exiting when ORDER liquidity or trading demand weakens, when the pool's 0.17x deteriorates, or when price repeatedly leaves your chosen range. A sustained fall in fee income below the current 12.1% level is also a clearer exit signal than headline APR alone.
Consider exiting when ORDER liquidity or trading demand weakens, when the pool's 0.17x deteriorates, or when price repeatedly leaves your chosen range. A sustained fall in fee income below the current 12.1% level is also a clearer exit signal than headline APR alone.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history and range occupancy are not reported. The fee stream is currently 12.1%, but whether it offsets future loss depends on price divergence, time in range, and realized trading volume.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history and range occupancy are not reported. The fee stream is currently 12.1%, but whether it offsets future loss depends on price divergence, time in range, and realized trading volume.
