WealthVille
STONK
S
STONKCATS
S

STONK-STONKCATSon Raydium AMMHigh Yield

Chain
Solana
TVL
TVL $140.85K
APR
349.1% APR
24h Volume
$239.86K 24h vol
Fee tier
0.25% fee
Pool address
C1CNCihC…w9GH · observed 2026-09-25
49D · Weak

Wealthville Score

Verdict HOLD · 59% confidence

ai_engine=hold
How this score works →
Enter45

new capital

Hold53

keep position

Exit29

urgency to leave

The Wealthville Score of 49/100 produces a live HOLD verdict from the ai_engine=hold driver. The Enter score of 45/100 is below the Hold score of 53/100, while the Exit score of 29/100 indicates that the system does not currently favor closing the position; the pool ranks #699 of 18146 raydium-amm pools. This is a conditional hold rather than a claim that the APR is durable: a TVL drain, sustained volume decline, or collapse in fee APR would weaken the assessment, while persistent fee generation with stable liquidity would support it.

Computed 2026-09-25 17:51 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.

Liquidityhelp

lock

$140.85K

Total value locked

$239.86K

24h volume

×1.7 turnover

Yieldhelp

trending_up

349.1%

advertised APR

Fee yield, annualized

≈ 93.5%

adjusted · net of IL (est.)

0.25% fee

My Position

account_balance_wallet
Live DataUpdated 27m agoTVL ↓20.8%
schedule

AI Verdict

Wait & Monitor

WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.

check_circleHigh swap activity: vol/TVL ratio 1.70x
warningElevated risk score: 85/100
tips_and_updates

Set a rebalance or exit rule for when the pool's observed volume-to-liquidity ratio falls below your minimum fee threshold for consecutive sessions; do not keep the position solely because the displayed APR remains high.

syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background

table_chart

Performance Breakdown

Metric24h / Day7d / Week30d / Month
Total APR349.1%——
Fee APR150.5%——
Volume$239.86K——
Fees Earned$599.66——

Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.

analytics

Efficiency Metrics

Computed

Deterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.

Sustainable Gross APY
193.5%(trailing 7d fees)
Impermanent-Loss Drag
−100.0%(realized, 7d annualized)
Adjusted Net APY (est.)
93.5%(after IL + repositioning)
Volume / TVL Ratio (24h)
1.70x
Fee Yield per $1 TVL / Day
$0.0043
Fee APR Sustainability
43% from trading fees(reward-dependent)
leaderboard

Pool Rankings

compare_arrows

#1 of 1 STONK-STONKCATS pools

by AI Farmer Score

hub

#950 of 71780 on raydium-amm

by AI Farmer Score

leaderboard

Top 2% of all Solana pools

overall rank #1958 of 122041

lightbulb

How This Pool Works

Beginner Friendly

This page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the STONK-STONKCATS liquidity pool on Raydium AMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.

Providing liquidity here means depositing both STONK and STONKCATS into the pool so traders can swap between them. You receive a share of trading fees, but the value of your deposit can fall if either token moves sharply relative to the other or if the pool becomes harder to exit.

description

Pool Analysis

trending_upYield Source Breakdown

Yield decomposes into 150.5% from trading fees and 198.6% from rewards, with fee sustainability at 43%. No active reward APR is currently contributing, so emission decay is not the present source of APR reduction; future fee yield still depends on trading volume and liquidity. Reward timing and dependency cannot be established from the available pool data.

shieldRisk Assessment

Recent seven-day impermanent-loss history is unavailable, as is the reported percentage of liquidity remaining in range, so recent loss and range-management behavior cannot be quantified. As a MEMECOIN pool, the main risks are sharp relative price moves, liquidity migration, and difficult exits during sentiment reversals. Emission decay is not currently visible in the reward component, but exit timing remains important because fee income can fall quickly when trading activity or liquidity leaves the pool.

tollSTONK Context

STONK is one side of this liquidity position, so providing liquidity exposes the LP to its price changes relative to STONKCATS. Liquidity depth for STONK outside this pool is not established by the supplied metrics; a sharp move or thin external market can increase execution losses and impermanent loss for the LP.

tollSTONKCATS Context

STONKCATS is the other side of the pair and determines the LP's relative-price exposure against STONK. Its liquidity depth elsewhere is not established here, so a sudden repricing, reduced market depth, or loss of trading interest can impair exits and reduce fee generation.

lightbulbSimple Explanation

Providing liquidity here means depositing both STONK and STONKCATS into the pool so traders can swap between them. You receive a share of trading fees, but the value of your deposit can fall if either token moves sharply relative to the other or if the pool becomes harder to exit.

token

Token Details

STONK
STONKSolana
Explorer

STONK is one of the two assets paired in this liquidity pool.

STONKCATS
STONKCATSSolana
Explorer

STONKCATS is one of the two assets paired in this liquidity pool.

info

Pool Details

Pool Address
C1CNCihCBJ2Jztbv7vfrXKrw9fKrma5fa3hhSjqyw9GH
Protocol
Raydium AMM
Chain
solana
Fee Tier
—
Pool Type
AMM
Token A
STONK (6GmAFSYs…)
Token B
STONKCATS (9h5AzEQz…)
Created
9/18/2026
lock

Non-Custodial

Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.

source

Verified Data Sources

Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield

psychology

AI-Powered Analysis

Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data

⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.

quiz

Frequently Asked Questions

The current reward-only APR is 198.6%, while fee APR is 150.5% and total APR is 349.1%. Because the displayed yield is currently fee-based, emission decay is not presently the main APR driver; declining trading volume would be more direct.

The current reward-only APR is 198.6%, while fee APR is 150.5% and total APR is 349.1%. Because the displayed yield is currently fee-based, emission decay is not presently the main APR driver; declining trading volume would be more direct.

The pool currently shows reward-only APR of 198.6%, so expiration would not remove a currently contributing reward stream if that state persists. Fee income would remain tied to trading activity, with fee APR at 150.5%.

The pool currently shows reward-only APR of 198.6%, so expiration would not remove a currently contributing reward stream if that state persists. Fee income would remain tied to trading activity, with fee APR at 150.5%.

Risk is driven by sharp relative price moves, uncertain outside liquidity, and the possibility that traders or LPs leave during a sentiment reversal. The pool's total APR is 349.1% and volume-to-liquidity ratio is 1.70x, but neither figure removes impermanent-loss or exit-liquidity risk.

Risk is driven by sharp relative price moves, uncertain outside liquidity, and the possibility that traders or LPs leave during a sentiment reversal. The pool's total APR is 349.1% and volume-to-liquidity ratio is 1.70x, but neither figure removes impermanent-loss or exit-liquidity risk.

Use a predefined trigger based on falling fee income, declining trading volume relative to liquidity, worsening exit liquidity, or a change in your view of either token. For this pool, a sustained drop in 1.70x or 150.5% would be a concrete reason to reassess rather than relying on the headline APR.

Use a predefined trigger based on falling fee income, declining trading volume relative to liquidity, worsening exit liquidity, or a change in your view of either token. For this pool, a sustained drop in 1.70x or 150.5% would be a concrete reason to reassess rather than relying on the headline APR.

A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history and the required price path are unavailable. Fees accrue at 150.5% on an annualized basis, but that rate is variable and may not offset relative-token losses.

A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history and the required price path are unavailable. Fees accrue at 150.5% on an annualized basis, but that rate is variable and may not offset relative-token losses.

Latest insights

Research, Recaps & Solana Alpha

Data-driven yield analysis and weekly market wraps — written for active LPs.

All insights