new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score of 42/100 assigns Enter 37/100, Hold 49/100, and Exit 32/100, with a live verdict of HOLD. That reflects the stated ai_engine=hold input being overridden by high risk at 85/100 and weak yield, despite fee-only sustainability. The pool ranks #375 of 1435 meteora-damm-v2 pools, which places it above many pools by rank but does not remove its thin-activity and memecoin risks. The assessment would improve if sustained volume rose relative to TVL without a corresponding liquidity drain; it would worsen if TVL fell, fee generation collapsed, or BADDIE liquidity deteriorated.
Computed 2026-10-02 04:25 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$39.13K
Total value locked
$2.28K
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up37.4%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ -23.3%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Wait & Monitor
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Set a defined tick range and monitor it actively; rebalance when the BADDIE/SOL price leaves that range, and treat persistently low volume at $2K against TVL of $39K as an exit signal rather than waiting for the fee APR to normalize.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 37.4% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 31.8% | — | — |
| Volume | $2.28K | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $36.84 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 1 BADDIE-SOL pools
by AI Farmer Score
#195 of 2183 on meteora-damm-v2
by AI Farmer Score
Top 4% of all Solana pools
overall rank #4577 of 127180
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the BADDIE-SOL liquidity pool on Meteora DAMM v2. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing BADDIE and SOL into a shared trading pool. Traders pay fees that are distributed to liquidity providers, but price changes can leave you with a different mix of BADDIE and SOL and a lower result than simply holding both assets.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
The stated return decomposes into 31.8% fee APR and 5.6% reward APR. 85% of the yield is attributed to trading fees, so there is no current reward contribution to offset weak trading activity. Reward dependency and any emission schedule are not established, making future APR less predictable than the current fee-only breakdown.
shieldRisk Assessment
A seven-day impermanent-loss reading is unavailable, so recent IL cannot be quantified from the supplied history. Tick-in-range history is also unavailable, leaving range utilization and out-of-range exposure unmeasured. As a MEMECOIN pool, BADDIE-SOL carries sharp relative-price and liquidity risks; emission decay can remove any future incentive support, so exit timing should be based on price divergence, usable range, and fee activity rather than waiting for rewards.
tollBADDIE Context
BADDIE is the memecoin side of this pair, and its price movement against SOL determines how much of the LP inventory becomes BADDIE or SOL. Liquidity depth for BADDIE elsewhere is not established by these pool metrics, so a sharp BADDIE move can increase inventory imbalance and execution slippage for this position.
tollSOL Context
SOL is the base asset and the comparison price for BADDIE's performance in this pool. SOL has broader market utility than BADDIE, but SOL appreciation relative to BADDIE can leave the LP holding more BADDIE after rebalancing, while a BADDIE rally can leave it holding more SOL.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing BADDIE and SOL into a shared trading pool. Traders pay fees that are distributed to liquidity providers, but price changes can leave you with a different mix of BADDIE and SOL and a lower result than simply holding both assets.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- C3BFS3zo5eH1AepvMcBQwvea1LJLuLEsK86jkv32K9CM
- Protocol
- Meteora DAMM v2
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- AMM
- Token A
- BADDIE (6oU3KgTx…)
- Token B
- SOL (So111111…)
- Created
- 7/29/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
0%
APR
12%
APR
9%
APR
0%
By Protocol
hubAll meteora-damm-v2 poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The current breakdown is 31.8% from fees and 5.6% from rewards, with 85% of yield coming from trading fees. If future incentives are introduced, emission decay would reduce the reward component over time; no established reward schedule is available here.
The current breakdown is 31.8% from fees and 5.6% from rewards, with 85% of yield coming from trading fees. If future incentives are introduced, emission decay would reduce the reward component over time; no established reward schedule is available here.
There is no current reward contribution in the stated APR, so expiration would not remove an existing reward component from the present breakdown. After any future incentives end, returns would depend on fee generation, which must be assessed against $2K, $39K, and 0.06x.
There is no current reward contribution in the stated APR, so expiration would not remove an existing reward component from the present breakdown. After any future incentives end, returns would depend on fee generation, which must be assessed against $2K, $39K, and 0.06x.
The pool has MEMECOIN-specific risks: rapid BADDIE price changes, uncertain liquidity outside this pool, inventory imbalance, and possible difficulty exiting without slippage. Those risks are reflected in the risk score of 85/100 and the live verdict HOLD.
The pool has MEMECOIN-specific risks: rapid BADDIE price changes, uncertain liquidity outside this pool, inventory imbalance, and possible difficulty exiting without slippage. Those risks are reflected in the risk score of 85/100 and the live verdict HOLD.
Use a predefined trigger such as the BADDIE/SOL price leaving your selected tick range, a sustained fall in fee-generating volume, or a decline in pool liquidity. For this pool, persistently low activity at $2K relative to $39K is a reason to reassess rather than rely on the stated 37.4%.
Use a predefined trigger such as the BADDIE/SOL price leaving your selected tick range, a sustained fall in fee-generating volume, or a decline in pool liquidity. For this pool, persistently low activity at $2K relative to $39K is a reason to reassess rather than rely on the stated 37.4%.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because seven-day IL history is unavailable and current activity is thin. The fee-only figure of 31.8% is an annualized indication, not a guarantee that fees will offset future IL or price divergence.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because seven-day IL history is unavailable and current activity is thin. The fee-only figure of 31.8% is an annualized indication, not a guarantee that fees will offset future IL or price divergence.
