new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score of 17/100 gives SOL-BUCKY a middle-range assessment: Enter is 15/100, Hold is 20/100, and Exit is 80/100, with the live verdict at EXIT. The ai_engine=hold driver is consistent with a pool that has fee-funded yield but limited turnover, rather than a clear accumulation or liquidation signal. Its rank of #1207 of 18146 raydium-amm pools places it above many listed pools but does not remove memecoin and liquidity risks. The assessment would weaken if TVL drains, fee income or total APR collapses, or BUCKY liquidity deteriorates; it would improve only with sustained volume relative to liquidity and more durable pool activity.
Computed 2026-09-28 15:27 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$61.01K
Total value locked
$123.51
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up0.7%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ 0.3%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Avoid
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Set a predefined exit trigger for a sustained decline in $124 or $61K, and rebalance only after checking whether the drop reflects reduced trading activity rather than a temporary price move; do not rely on unverified reward continuation.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 0.7% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 0.7% | — | — |
| Volume | $123.51 | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $0.31 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 1 SOL-Bucky pools
by AI Farmer Score
#3754 of 75672 on raydium-amm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 7% of all Solana pools
overall rank #7735 of 127180
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the SOL-Bucky liquidity pool on Raydium AMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and BUCKY into a shared pool so traders can swap between them. You receive a portion of trading fees, but you can finish with a different mix of SOL and BUCKY, and the BUCKY side may be difficult to sell if activity declines.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
The stated yield decomposes into 0.7% from trading fees and 0.0% from rewards, with 100% of yield attributed to trading fees. Reward dependency and the incentive lifecycle are not established, so the reward component should not be treated as durable. With no confirmed reward schedule, N/A is not available for forward planning.
shieldRisk Assessment
Recent impermanent-loss and tick-in-range history are not reported, so price-divergence and range-management outcomes cannot be quantified from the available record. As a MEMECOIN pool, SOL-BUCKY carries token-specific liquidity and exit risk in addition to ordinary SOL exposure. Emission decay matters less while fee yield supplies the stated return, but any incentive change or loss of trading activity can alter exit timing quickly.
tollSOL Context
SOL is the established, non-memecoin side of this pair and generally has deeper liquidity across Solana venues than BUCKY. If SOL rises or falls sharply against BUCKY, the pool rebalances toward the asset that has underperformed, which can leave an LP with less of the appreciating asset than a passive wallet would hold.
tollBucky Context
BUCKY is the pool's memecoin leg, so its price discovery and exit liquidity are likely to be more dependent on concentrated market activity than SOL's. A sharp BUCKY move, a widening market, or declining external liquidity can increase inventory imbalance and make withdrawal execution more difficult.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and BUCKY into a shared pool so traders can swap between them. You receive a portion of trading fees, but you can finish with a different mix of SOL and BUCKY, and the BUCKY side may be difficult to sell if activity declines.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- C7EUe5HAoerJU2dxnnLr7Mf1zF6YW3LWepUxphfYGLy1
- Protocol
- Raydium AMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- AMM
- Token A
- SOL (So111111…)
- Token B
- Bucky (7hZmPPkB…)
- Created
- 4/22/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
42%
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
7%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-amm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The current total APR is 0.7%, consisting of 0.7% in fees and 0.0% in rewards. Because 100% of yield comes from fees and the reward schedule is not established, emission decay would mainly reduce any reward contribution rather than the fee component.
The current total APR is 0.7%, consisting of 0.7% in fees and 0.0% in rewards. Because 100% of yield comes from fees and the reward schedule is not established, emission decay would mainly reduce any reward contribution rather than the fee component.
With reward APR at 0.0%, the pool is already described as entirely fee-funded for yield. If incentives expire, the remaining return depends on trading fees generated by $124 against $61K, and the total APR could fall if trading does not increase.
With reward APR at 0.0%, the pool is already described as entirely fee-funded for yield. If incentives expire, the remaining return depends on trading fees generated by $124 against $61K, and the total APR could fall if trading does not increase.
The risk is substantial because BUCKY can experience sharp price moves and weaker exit liquidity than SOL. The pool also has $61K of liquidity and a 0.00x turnover ratio, while recent impermanent-loss and range-history readings are unavailable.
The risk is substantial because BUCKY can experience sharp price moves and weaker exit liquidity than SOL. The pool also has $61K of liquidity and a 0.00x turnover ratio, while recent impermanent-loss and range-history readings are unavailable.
Use predefined signals such as a sustained decline in $124, a drain from $61K, weakening fee APR, or deteriorating BUCKY liquidity. Exit timing should also account for whether the position has become heavily concentrated in the weaker asset after a large SOL-BUCKY price move.
Use predefined signals such as a sustained decline in $124, a drain from $61K, weakening fee APR, or deteriorating BUCKY liquidity. Exit timing should also account for whether the position has become heavily concentrated in the weaker asset after a large SOL-BUCKY price move.
A defensible break-even period cannot be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history is not reported. The gross annualized reference is 0.7%, but actual recovery depends on future fee volume, price divergence, and whether the position remains tradable.
A defensible break-even period cannot be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history is not reported. The gross annualized reference is 0.7%, but actual recovery depends on future fee volume, price divergence, and whether the position remains tradable.
