new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score of 44/100 assigns Enter 38/100, Hold 51/100, and Exit 29/100, with the live verdict HOLD and the listed driver ai_engine=hold. Its position at #730 of 8541 raydium-amm pools places it above many ranked pools but does not establish that its small liquidity base is suitable for every LP size. The hold assessment would weaken if TVL drains, volume falls further, fee APR collapses, or GOAT liquidity becomes harder to exit; it would improve if sustained volume increased fee generation without a corresponding liquidity deterioration.
Computed 2026-09-07 15:02 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$35.65K
Total value locked
$480.22
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up4.1%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ -14.0%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Wait & Monitor
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Use a deliberately bounded range centered on the current SOL-GOAT price, set an alert for the first sustained move outside that range, and withdraw or recenter rather than widening automatically. Treat a material decline in daily volume or pool liquidity as an exit signal because fees are the entire current yield source.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 4.1% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 4.0% | — | — |
| Volume | $480.22 | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $1.20 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 1 SOL-GOAT pools
by AI Farmer Score
#2410 of 63453 on raydium-amm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 6% of all Solana pools
overall rank #5604 of 110016
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the SOL-GOAT liquidity pool on Raydium AMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and GOAT into the pool so other users can trade between them. You receive a share of trading fees, but your final holdings can differ from what you deposited, especially if GOAT and SOL move by different amounts or the pool becomes difficult to exit.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
SOL-GOAT's total APR of 4.1% decomposes into fee-only APR of 4.0% and reward-only APR of 0.1%. Fee sustainability is 98%, meaning the displayed yield is currently attributable to swap fees rather than reward emissions. Reward dependency remains uncertain, so future emission policy should not be treated as a reliable source of return; the current reward contribution is already represented by 0.1%.
shieldRisk Assessment
A recent seven-day impermanent-loss reading and tick-in-range reading are not available, so recent price-path damage and range utilization cannot be quantified. As a MEMECOIN pool, SOL-GOAT carries substantial divergence, liquidity, and exit-timing risk if GOAT reprices rapidly or market makers withdraw liquidity. Emission decay is not the primary current risk because reward APR is 0.1%, but any future incentive reduction would leave LPs relying more heavily on trading fees; exit timing should account for the pool's shallow liquidity and uncertain lifecycle.
tollSOL Context
SOL is the pool's established Solana-side asset and generally has deeper liquidity across other venues than a memecoin pairing. SOL price movement changes the relative SOL-GOAT price, so a strong move in SOL can push a position out of range or increase divergence loss even when GOAT is unchanged. Its broader market liquidity can make the SOL leg easier to hedge than the GOAT leg, but it does not remove pool-specific execution risk.
tollGOAT Context
GOAT is the pool's memecoin-side asset, making its price discovery and liquidity more dependent on concentrated market interest than SOL's. A sharp GOAT move can create impermanent loss, move the position outside its active range, and make withdrawal or rebalancing more expensive. If GOAT liquidity or attention declines, fee generation and exit quality can deteriorate together.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and GOAT into the pool so other users can trade between them. You receive a share of trading fees, but your final holdings can differ from what you deposited, especially if GOAT and SOL move by different amounts or the pool becomes difficult to exit.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- C9q4Mo1jKkz7Sg1guw9B39DWBD6opBD8cByVHnHDBKDm
- Protocol
- Raydium AMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- AMM
- Token A
- SOL (So111111…)
- Token B
- GOAT (7X84qLj1…)
- Created
- 4/22/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
369%
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
18%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-amm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The current reward-only APR is 0.1%, while fee-only APR is 4.0% and total APR is 4.1%. Because current yield is fee-led, emission decay has little immediate effect, but any future rewards should be treated as uncertain rather than permanent.
The current reward-only APR is 0.1%, while fee-only APR is 4.0% and total APR is 4.1%. Because current yield is fee-led, emission decay has little immediate effect, but any future rewards should be treated as uncertain rather than permanent.
If incentives expire, the reward component can fall to zero or remain at its already limited level, leaving LPs dependent on 4.0% in trading fees. Since fee sustainability is 98%, continued returns require sufficient SOL-GOAT trading volume.
If incentives expire, the reward component can fall to zero or remain at its already limited level, leaving LPs dependent on 4.0% in trading fees. Since fee sustainability is 98%, continued returns require sufficient SOL-GOAT trading volume.
Risk is elevated because GOAT can move sharply against SOL, while $36K of liquidity and $480 of recent volume indicate a relatively small trading venue. The pool's 0.01x volume-to-liquidity ratio also shows that recent fee generation has been limited relative to deposited liquidity.
Risk is elevated because GOAT can move sharply against SOL, while $36K of liquidity and $480 of recent volume indicate a relatively small trading venue. The pool's 0.01x volume-to-liquidity ratio also shows that recent fee generation has been limited relative to deposited liquidity.
Consider exiting when price remains outside your selected range, when GOAT liquidity or pool TVL deteriorates, or when fee income no longer compensates for divergence risk. For SOL-GOAT, a sustained volume decline is especially relevant because the current yield is 4.0% in fees rather than rewards.
Consider exiting when price remains outside your selected range, when GOAT liquidity or pool TVL deteriorates, or when fee income no longer compensates for divergence risk. For SOL-GOAT, a sustained volume decline is especially relevant because the current yield is 4.0% in fees rather than rewards.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history is unavailable. Break-even depends on future trading fees, represented by 4.0%, and whether SOL-GOAT volume remains sufficient to offset the position's divergence from simply holding SOL and GOAT.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history is unavailable. Break-even depends on future trading fees, represented by 4.0%, and whether SOL-GOAT volume remains sufficient to offset the position's divergence from simply holding SOL and GOAT.
