new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score of 17/100 and component scores of Enter 15/100 / Hold 20/100 / Exit 80/100 produce the live verdict EXIT, with ai_engine=hold as the stated driver. Its rank of #530 of 8541 raydium-amm pools places it above many listed pools, but that ranking does not remove the specific weakness of low turnover relative to its liquidity and the absence of reward support. The assessment would improve with sustained volume and deeper TVL; it would deteriorate if TVL drains, fee income collapses, FIW liquidity thins, or price volatility produces material inventory losses.
Computed 2026-08-25 22:25 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$27.09K
Total value locked
$117.14
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up1.5%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ -94.0%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Avoid
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Use a full-range position rather than relying on an unverified narrow tick band, and reassess the position if fee-only APR falls materially below 1.5% or TVL begins a sustained drain. For this low-turnover memecoin pool, an exit trigger based on weakening liquidity is more defensible than waiting for rewards to compensate.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 1.5% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 1.5% | — | — |
| Volume | $117.14 | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $0.29 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 1 FIW-SOL pools
by AI Farmer Score
#2094 of 55835 on raydium-amm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 5% of all Solana pools
overall rank #4721 of 98856
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the FIW-SOL liquidity pool on Raydium AMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing FIW and SOL into a shared pool so other users can trade between them, while you receive a portion of trading fees. Your holdings can change in value as FIW and SOL prices move, and the current return comes from fees rather than rewards.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
The yield decomposes into 1.5% from trading fees and 0.0% from rewards. 99% of the return is fee-funded, so the current APR does not depend on active farm emissions. Reward dependency and the remaining reward schedule are not established, making emission decay a relevant monitoring issue even though the current reward component is zero.
shieldRisk Assessment
Recent impermanent-loss history and tick-range exposure are not available for this pool, so realized loss and the share of liquidity remaining in range cannot be assessed from the supplied data. As a MEMECOIN pool, FIW-SOL carries sharp price-move and liquidity-exit risk in addition to ordinary pool rebalancing risk. Emission decay is less important to the current return than exit timing: if FIW demand weakens, liquidity leaves, or SOL moves sharply against FIW, fee income may not offset the resulting inventory change.
tollFIW Context
FIW is the memecoin side of this pair, so its price movement determines how the pool's holdings are rebalanced between FIW and SOL. This pool's data does not establish FIW's liquidity depth elsewhere; thin external liquidity would make abrupt price moves and difficult exits more consequential for LPs. A sharp FIW rally or decline can leave the LP holding a less favorable mix even when fees accrue.
tollSOL Context
SOL is the more established settlement asset in the pair and provides the pool's primary reference value for FIW. This pool's data does not establish SOL's liquidity depth elsewhere, but SOL volatility still changes the relative price path that drives LP inventory shifts. A large SOL move against FIW can create losses that low trading fees may not recover quickly.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing FIW and SOL into a shared pool so other users can trade between them, while you receive a portion of trading fees. Your holdings can change in value as FIW and SOL prices move, and the current return comes from fees rather than rewards.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- CAnJy5Rs2zTvvdhTdjk11x8SNwGknEQ7AFXVScUfYYJT
- Protocol
- Raydium AMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- AMM
- Token A
- FIW (FeKmTunV…)
- Token B
- SOL (So111111…)
- Created
- 6/24/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
10%
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
177%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-amm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The current return is 1.5%, split between 1.5% in fees and 0.0% in rewards, with 99% of yield from fees. Because the reward component is currently zero, further emission decay would not directly reduce the present APR, but it leaves fees as the only demonstrated support.
The current return is 1.5%, split between 1.5% in fees and 0.0% in rewards, with 99% of yield from fees. Because the reward component is currently zero, further emission decay would not directly reduce the present APR, but it leaves fees as the only demonstrated support.
There is currently no demonstrated reward contribution because 0.0% is zero and 99% of yield comes from fees. If incentives are later added and then expire, the pool's sustainable return would be the fee component, 1.5%, unless trading volume also changes.
There is currently no demonstrated reward contribution because 0.0% is zero and 99% of yield comes from fees. If incentives are later added and then expire, the pool's sustainable return would be the fee component, 1.5%, unless trading volume also changes.
The risk is elevated because FIW can move sharply, external liquidity depth is not established, and the pool has low turnover at 0.00x. The current 1.5% return is fee-funded, but fee income may not offset a rapid FIW-SOL price move or a liquidity exit.
The risk is elevated because FIW can move sharply, external liquidity depth is not established, and the pool has low turnover at 0.00x. The current 1.5% return is fee-funded, but fee income may not offset a rapid FIW-SOL price move or a liquidity exit.
For FIW-SOL, consider exiting when TVL shows a sustained drain, fee-only APR falls materially below 1.5%, or FIW liquidity and trading activity weaken. Waiting for emissions is not a strong exit plan because the current reward contribution is 0.0%.
For FIW-SOL, consider exiting when TVL shows a sustained drain, fee-only APR falls materially below 1.5%, or FIW liquidity and trading activity weaken. Waiting for emissions is not a strong exit plan because the current reward contribution is 0.0%.
A precise break-even period cannot be established because recent loss history and range exposure are unavailable. If prices remain stable, a rough fee-only recovery frame is the inverse of 1.5% per year, but a large FIW-SOL price divergence can extend that period substantially.
A precise break-even period cannot be established because recent loss history and range exposure are unavailable. If prices remain stable, a rough fee-only recovery frame is the inverse of 1.5% per year, but a large FIW-SOL price divergence can extend that period substantially.
