WealthVille
LEOS
L
Satfi
S

LEOS-Satfion Raydium CLMMCLMM

Chain
Solana
TVL
TVL $35.14K
APR
0.1% APR
24h Volume
$37.23 24h vol
Fee tier
1.00% fee
Pool address
CCjtCzrX…aegc · observed 2026-10-16
17F · Poor

Wealthville Score

Verdict EXIT · 70% confidence

ai_engine=holdscanner=CRITICAL
How this score works →
Enter15

new capital

Hold20

keep position

Exit80

urgency to leave

The Wealthville Score is 17/100, with Enter at 15/100, Hold at 20/100, and Exit at 80/100; the live verdict is EXIT and the stated verdict driver is ai_engine=hold. Its rank of #180 among 8415 raydium-clmm pools places it relatively high within the tracked set, but that ranking does not remove memecoin or liquidity risks. The assessment would weaken with a material TVL drain, further volume deterioration, or a collapse in fee generation, and would need reassessment if sustained volume or fee yield materially increased.

Computed 2026-10-15 23:53 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.

Liquidityhelp

lock

$35.14K

Total value locked

$37.23

24h volume

×0.0 turnover

Yieldhelp

trending_up

0.1%

advertised APR

Fee yield, annualized

≈ 0.0%

adjusted · net of IL (est.)

1.00% fee

My Position

account_balance_wallet
Live DataUpdated 375m agoTVL ↓1.7%
block

AI Verdict

Avoid

WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.

check_circleStrong stable income score: 100/100
check_circleFee-driven yield: 100% of APR from trading fees
warningElevated risk score: 69/100
tips_and_updates

Enter with a range centered on the current LEOS-SATFI price and rebalance when price approaches either boundary; exit if volume remains weak while TVL drains or if the fee-only return no longer compensates for the position's inventory imbalance.

syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background

table_chart

Performance Breakdown

Metric24h / Day7d / Week30d / Month
Total APR0.1%——
Fee APR0.1%——
Volume$37.23——
Fees Earned$0.37——

Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.

analytics

Efficiency Metrics

Computed

Deterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.

Sustainable Gross APY
0.2%(trailing 7d fees)
Impermanent-Loss Drag
−0.1%(realized, 30d annualized)
Adjusted Net APY (est.)
0.0%(after IL + repositioning)
Volume / TVL Ratio (24h)
0.00x
Fee Yield per $1 TVL / Day
$0.0000
Fee APR Sustainability
100% from trading fees(sustainable)
leaderboard

Pool Rankings

compare_arrows

#1 of 1 LEOS-Satfi pools

by AI Farmer Score

hub

#1736 of 18853 on raydium-clmm

by AI Farmer Score

leaderboard

Top 15% of all Solana pools

overall rank #20909 of 141086

lightbulb

How This Pool Works

Beginner Friendly

This page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the LEOS-Satfi liquidity pool on Raydium CLMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.

Providing liquidity here means depositing LEOS and SATFI into a shared trading pool so swaps can use them. You receive a share of trading fees, but strong price movement can leave you holding more of the token that has fallen and less of the one that has risen.

description

Pool Analysis

trending_upYield Source Breakdown

The stated yield decomposes into 0.1% from trading fees and 0.0% from rewards. 100% of yield comes from fees, while reward dependency and the reward lifecycle are not established in the supplied metrics; with reward APR at its current level, the position should not be valued on emissions.

shieldRisk Assessment

A seven-day impermanent-loss reading and seven-day tick-in-range reading are unavailable, so recent price divergence and range utilization cannot be quantified from this data. As a MEMECOIN pool, LEOS-SATFI carries token-specific price and liquidity risk, while emission decay or incentive withdrawal can reduce any future reward component; exit timing matters because fees may not compensate for a rapid move in either token.

tollLEOS Context

LEOS is one side of this concentrated-liquidity pair, so an LP holds exposure to LEOS price movement while supplying the counter-asset needed for swaps. Liquidity depth for LEOS outside this pool is not established by the supplied metrics; thin external liquidity can amplify price impact and increase inventory imbalance during exits.

tollSatfi Context

SATFI is the other asset in the pair and determines the counter-exposure held alongside LEOS. Its liquidity depth elsewhere is not provided, so SATFI price action, market fragmentation, or a sharp move against LEOS can push the position out of range and leave the LP holding more of the weaker asset.

lightbulbSimple Explanation

Providing liquidity here means depositing LEOS and SATFI into a shared trading pool so swaps can use them. You receive a share of trading fees, but strong price movement can leave you holding more of the token that has fallen and less of the one that has risen.

token

Token Details

LEOS
LEOSleOSSolana
Explorer

leOS (LEOS) — one of the two assets paired in this liquidity pool.

Satfi
SatfiSolana
Explorer

Satfi is one of the two assets paired in this liquidity pool.

info

Pool Details

Pool Address
CCjtCzrXQQsbqFCUi1i3FhYatMJmrQAoKCGty56jaegc
Protocol
Raydium CLMM
Chain
solana
Fee Tier
—
Pool Type
Concentrated Liquidity (CLMM)
Token A
LEOS (5xgsnby6…)
Token B
Satfi (9avVfYKa…)
Created
5/22/2026
lock

Non-Custodial

Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.

source

Verified Data Sources

Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield

psychology

AI-Powered Analysis

Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data

⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.

quiz

Frequently Asked Questions

The current reward-only APR is 0.0%, so the stated 0.1% APR is currently fee-based rather than emission-based. If incentives are introduced and then decay, the reward component would fall while 0.1% would remain dependent on trading activity.

The current reward-only APR is 0.0%, so the stated 0.1% APR is currently fee-based rather than emission-based. If incentives are introduced and then decay, the reward component would fall while 0.1% would remain dependent on trading activity.

With reward APR at 0.0%, expiration would not remove a currently stated reward stream, but any future incentive would disappear and leave fees as the remaining yield source. 100% already identifies the current share of yield attributed to fees.

With reward APR at 0.0%, expiration would not remove a currently stated reward stream, but any future incentive would disappear and leave fees as the remaining yield source. 100% already identifies the current share of yield attributed to fees.

Risk is elevated by memecoin price volatility, uncertain external liquidity, and the possibility that a rapid move pushes the position outside its active range. The pool reports $35K TVL and 0.00x Vol/TVL, while recent impermanent-loss and tick-range readings are unavailable.

Risk is elevated by memecoin price volatility, uncertain external liquidity, and the possibility that a rapid move pushes the position outside its active range. The pool reports $35K TVL and 0.00x Vol/TVL, while recent impermanent-loss and tick-range readings are unavailable.

Consider exiting when price approaches a range boundary, when TVL drains, or when fee generation falls enough that 0.1% no longer compensates for inventory and execution risk. A sharp one-sided move or worsening liquidity can justify exiting before a formal reward change.

Consider exiting when price approaches a range boundary, when TVL drains, or when fee generation falls enough that 0.1% no longer compensates for inventory and execution risk. A sharp one-sided move or worsening liquidity can justify exiting before a formal reward change.

It cannot be estimated reliably because the recent impermanent-loss reading is unavailable and future volume is uncertain. Ignoring price movement and costs, a rough fee-only payback period is approximately 1 / 0.1% years, but actual break-even depends on the path of LEOS and SATFI prices.

It cannot be estimated reliably because the recent impermanent-loss reading is unavailable and future volume is uncertain. Ignoring price movement and costs, a rough fee-only payback period is approximately 1 / 0.1% years, but actual break-even depends on the path of LEOS and SATFI prices.

Latest insights

Research, Recaps & Solana Alpha

Data-driven yield analysis and weekly market wraps — written for active LPs.

All insights