new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score is 17/100, with Enter at 15/100, Hold at 20/100, and Exit at 80/100; the live verdict is EXIT. That translates to a watch-and-maintain assessment rather than a strong new-entry signal, consistent with the recorded verdict driver ai_engine=hold. The pool ranks #1108 of 8541 raydium-amm pools, placing it within the broader set but not establishing superior fee generation. The assessment would worsen with a TVL drain, further volume contraction, or collapse of fee income, and could improve if sustained trading volume raises the fee APR without a corresponding increase in adverse price movement.
Computed 2026-09-18 06:07 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$112.38K
Total value locked
$83.63
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up0.1%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ -30.0%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Avoid
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Enter only with a defined exit trigger: set an alert for a material TVL drain or a sustained decline in swap activity, and withdraw if either persists rather than waiting for emissions or fee income to recover. Because current tick coverage is unavailable, avoid assuming a passive full-range position is efficiently deployed.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 0.1% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 0.1% | — | — |
| Volume | $83.63 | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $0.21 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 3 SOL-Quant pools
by AI Farmer Score
#4096 of 69219 on raydium-amm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 8% of all Solana pools
overall rank #8469 of 118991
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the SOL-Quant liquidity pool on Raydium AMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and QUANT into a shared trading pool so other users can swap between them. You receive a share of trading fees, currently represented by 0.1%, but the value of your deposit can fall if either token moves sharply relative to the other.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
Yield decomposes into a fee-only APR of 0.1% and a reward-only APR of 0.0%. 100% of yield is sourced from trading fees, so the return depends on continued swap activity rather than a stated token-emission schedule. Reward dependency is not established, and no reward-duration estimate is available; the current reward contribution is therefore not a basis for the APR.
shieldRisk Assessment
Seven-day impermanent-loss history and tick-in-range coverage are not available for this pool, so recent price divergence and range efficiency cannot be quantified from the supplied data. As a MEMECOIN pool, SOL-QUANT remains exposed to sharp QUANT repricing, thin liquidity, and adverse selection when traders rebalance against LPs. Emission decay is not currently contributing reported yield, but exit timing still matters: an LP should reassess if trading activity weakens, liquidity drains, or incentives appear and then begin to decay.
tollSOL Context
SOL is the established, liquid asset in this pair and normally has deeper liquidity across Solana venues than QUANT. SOL price moves change the pool's inventory mix and can create impermanent loss when SOL trends sharply against QUANT; its broader market liquidity may make SOL-side rebalancing easier, but it does not remove pair-level risk.
tollQuant Context
QUANT is the memecoin side of the pair, so its liquidity depth and price discovery are likely more dependent on this pool and other limited venues than SOL's. A rapid QUANT rally or collapse can shift the LP toward the weaker-performing asset and increase realized losses when liquidity is withdrawn.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and QUANT into a shared trading pool so other users can swap between them. You receive a share of trading fees, currently represented by 0.1%, but the value of your deposit can fall if either token moves sharply relative to the other.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- CE44EngGpTghBggcUSSAMJdhoisN7YugaKnDjcsp5r1d
- Protocol
- Raydium AMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- AMM
- Token A
- SOL (So111111…)
- Token B
- Quant (3an8rhde…)
- Created
- 4/22/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
114%
APR
1%
APR
0%
APR
7%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-amm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The current reward-only APR is 0.0%, so reported yield is not presently dependent on emissions. If incentives are introduced later, their decay would reduce that component while the fee-only APR of 0.1% would still depend on trading volume.
The current reward-only APR is 0.0%, so reported yield is not presently dependent on emissions. If incentives are introduced later, their decay would reduce that component while the fee-only APR of 0.1% would still depend on trading volume.
There is no current reward APR attributed to the pool, so an incentive expiry would not remove a stated source of present yield. The remaining return would be the fee-only APR of 0.1%, supported by actual swaps and subject to the pool's low 0.00x turnover.
There is no current reward APR attributed to the pool, so an incentive expiry would not remove a stated source of present yield. The remaining return would be the fee-only APR of 0.1%, supported by actual swaps and subject to the pool's low 0.00x turnover.
Risk is elevated because QUANT can move sharply and may have less liquidity elsewhere than SOL. The pool's current $112K TVL and $84 in 24h volume indicate that withdrawal and price execution should be assessed carefully, while recent impermanent-loss and tick-range history is unavailable.
Risk is elevated because QUANT can move sharply and may have less liquidity elsewhere than SOL. The pool's current $112K TVL and $84 in 24h volume indicate that withdrawal and price execution should be assessed carefully, while recent impermanent-loss and tick-range history is unavailable.
Use a predefined trigger such as a sustained TVL drain, weakening swap activity, or a sharp QUANT move that leaves the position concentrated in the weaker asset. Since the current verdict is EXIT, reassess rather than automatically adding capital when those conditions appear.
Use a predefined trigger such as a sustained TVL drain, weakening swap activity, or a sharp QUANT move that leaves the position concentrated in the weaker asset. Since the current verdict is EXIT, reassess rather than automatically adding capital when those conditions appear.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history and tick-range data are unavailable. Fee income is represented by 0.1%, but whether it offsets price divergence depends on future trading volume and the relative paths of SOL and QUANT.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history and tick-range data are unavailable. Fee income is represented by 0.1%, but whether it offsets price divergence depends on future trading volume and the relative paths of SOL and QUANT.
