SOL-TSLAxon Raydium CLMMCLMMActive
- Chain
- Solana
- TVL
- TVL $74.95K
- APR
- 24.9% APR
- 24h Volume
- $16.11K 24h vol
- Fee tier
- 0.25% fee
- Pool address
- CKmjDiqB…5RJ8 · observed 2026-09-05
new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score of 49/100 places SOL-TSLAX in a middle range rather than at the top of the pool set: Enter is 44/100, Hold is 55/100, and Exit is 25/100, producing a live HOLD verdict from ai_engine=hold. Its #84 of 4410 raydium-clmm ranking indicates stronger standing than most listed pools, but it does not remove memecoin, concentration, or liquidity risks. The assessment would change if TVL drained, volume weakened enough to reduce fee APR, the total APR collapsed, or the pool developed a persistent price-range problem; stronger and sustained liquidity and fee activity would support a more favorable reassessment.
Computed 2026-09-05 14:56 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$74.95K
Total value locked
$16.11K
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up24.9%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ 26.8%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Wait & Monitor
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Enter with a range centered on the current active SOL-TSLAX ticks, then rebalance or reduce exposure when price leaves that range or when TVL and trading activity deteriorate enough that fee generation no longer supports the position. Treat a sharp TSLAX repricing or a sustained liquidity drain as an exit signal rather than waiting for incentives to compensate for the move.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 24.9% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 22.3% | — | — |
| Volume | $16.11K | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $40.27 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 15 SOL-TSLAx pools
by AI Farmer Score
#309 of 14926 on raydium-clmm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 2% of all Solana pools
overall rank #2055 of 107256
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the SOL-TSLAx liquidity pool on Raydium CLMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and TSLAX into a price range so traders can swap between them, while you receive part of the trading fees. If TSLAX moves sharply or the price leaves your range, the position can become less valuable or stop earning fees until it is adjusted.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
The displayed APR decomposes into 22.3% from trading fees and 2.7% from rewards, with 89% of yield attributed to fees. Because the reward schedule and dependency are not established, no duration-based reward assumption should be made; the fee component will vary with trading volume, liquidity, and the share of fees allocated to LPs.
shieldRisk Assessment
Seven-day impermanent-loss history and tick-in-range history are unavailable, so recent price divergence and range utilization cannot be quantified from these metrics. As a MEMECOIN pool, SOL-TSLAX is exposed to sharp TSLAX price moves, thin or shifting liquidity, and rapid changes in trading activity. Emission decay is an additional risk if incentives are introduced later, and exit timing matters because a falling token narrative can reduce volume before an LP can leave near the intended range.
tollSOL Context
SOL is the more established and broadly liquid side of this pair, with deeper liquidity across Solana venues than a typical memecoin. SOL price movements change the relative value of the position and can push the concentrated-liquidity range out of balance, creating rebalancing or impermanent-loss exposure against TSLAX.
tollTSLAx Context
TSLAX is the memecoin leg and is likely to determine most of the pair's idiosyncratic risk, including sudden repricing and changes in available exit liquidity. Its liquidity depth outside this pool should be checked independently; a price move in TSLAX can generate fees while still leaving the LP with adverse inventory exposure.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and TSLAX into a price range so traders can swap between them, while you receive part of the trading fees. If TSLAX moves sharply or the price leaves your range, the position can become less valuable or stop earning fees until it is adjusted.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- CKmjDiqBCRqR8xk5FjnFiQXuCFsGchiLv9YwYVnE5RJ8
- Protocol
- Raydium CLMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- Concentrated Liquidity (CLMM)
- Token A
- SOL (So111111…)
- Token B
- TSLAx (XsDoVfqe…)
- Created
- 4/20/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
0%
APR
93%
APR
1%
APR
0%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-clmm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The current displayed yield is divided into 22.3% fee APR and 2.7% reward APR, so emission decay does not directly reduce the current fee component. If rewards are introduced or later reduced, the reward portion would decline while fee APR would still depend on trading volume and liquidity.
The current displayed yield is divided into 22.3% fee APR and 2.7% reward APR, so emission decay does not directly reduce the current fee component. If rewards are introduced or later reduced, the reward portion would decline while fee APR would still depend on trading volume and liquidity.
The pool's displayed reward component is 2.7%, while 89% of yield comes from trading fees. If incentives expire or remain absent, LP income would rely primarily on fees, and the resulting APR could fall if liquidity remains while volume declines.
The pool's displayed reward component is 2.7%, while 89% of yield comes from trading fees. If incentives expire or remain absent, LP income would rely primarily on fees, and the resulting APR could fall if liquidity remains while volume declines.
Risk is high relative to a SOL pair with two established assets because TSLAX can reprice abruptly and may have thinner external liquidity. Fee income of 22.3% does not eliminate inventory loss, range risk, or the possibility that exiting becomes difficult during a sharp move.
Risk is high relative to a SOL pair with two established assets because TSLAX can reprice abruptly and may have thinner external liquidity. Fee income of 22.3% does not eliminate inventory loss, range risk, or the possibility that exiting becomes difficult during a sharp move.
For SOL-TSLAX, reassess when TSLAX loses reliable external liquidity, price leaves the selected range, TVL drains, or volume falls enough that fee generation no longer justifies the exposure. A sharp narrative or price break is an earlier exit signal than waiting for reward changes, particularly because the pool is a MEMECOIN pool.
For SOL-TSLAX, reassess when TSLAX loses reliable external liquidity, price leaves the selected range, TVL drains, or volume falls enough that fee generation no longer justifies the exposure. A sharp narrative or price break is an earlier exit signal than waiting for reward changes, particularly because the pool is a MEMECOIN pool.
There is no reliable break-even estimate from the available data because recent impermanent-loss history and time spent in range are unavailable. Break-even depends on future fee accrual, price divergence between SOL and TSLAX, liquidity changes, and whether the position remains active in its selected range.
There is no reliable break-even estimate from the available data because recent impermanent-loss history and time spent in range are unavailable. Break-even depends on future fee accrual, price divergence between SOL and TSLAX, liquidity changes, and whether the position remains active in its selected range.
