Wealthville Score
Verdict REDUCE · 45% confidence
new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score of 45/100 places this pool below its Enter score of 40/100 and Hold score of 52/100, while its Exit score is 50/100. The live verdict is REDUCE because the scanner is CRITICAL and the strong EXIT signal is unopposed, despite ai_engine=hold. The pool ranks #2192 of 18146 raydium-amm pools, so the assessment is materially weaker than most ranked alternatives. A sustained increase in trading volume and TVL, clearer reward support, or a removal of the critical scanner condition could improve the assessment; a TVL drain or collapse in fee income would reinforce it.
Computed 2026-10-05 11:51 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$35.16K
Total value locked
$401.25
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up0.5%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ -59.9%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Proceed with Caution
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
If entering despite the current REDUCE, use a narrow range around the prevailing SOL-ROT price, withdraw when the position leaves that range, and do not wait for emissions to justify holding because current reward yield is 0.0%.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 0.5% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 0.5% | — | — |
| Volume | $401.25 | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $1.00 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 1 SOL-rot pools
by AI Farmer Score
#5007 of 78272 on raydium-amm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 8% of all Solana pools
overall rank #9566 of 130194
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the SOL-rot liquidity pool on Raydium AMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and ROT into a shared pool so other users can trade between them, while you receive a share of trading fees. You can end up with more of one token and less of the other, and the value can fall if ROT moves sharply or the pool becomes difficult to exit.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
The yield decomposes into 0.5% from trading fees and 0.0% from rewards, with 100% of yield sourced from fees. Reward dependency is not established, so the current APR should not be treated as dependent on a documented incentive schedule. The pool's low volume-to-liquidity activity leaves fee generation sensitive to any further decline in trading.
shieldRisk Assessment
Recent seven-day impermanent-loss history and tick-in-range history are unavailable, so neither recent divergence cost nor range efficiency can be quantified. As a MEMECOIN pool, SOL-ROT also carries sharp price-movement and liquidity-contraction risk in the ROT leg. Emission decay is not currently measurable from a documented reward schedule, while exit timing matters because fee income may not compensate for a rapid ROT repricing or a withdrawal of pool liquidity.
tollSOL Context
SOL is the established network asset in this pair and has substantially broader liquidity across Solana venues than this pool. For this LP, a SOL price move relative to ROT changes the pool's asset mix through rebalancing; a large divergence can create impermanent loss even when SOL itself remains liquid elsewhere.
tollrot Context
ROT is the memecoin leg and is likely to determine most of the pair's idiosyncratic price and liquidity risk. A sharp ROT move or reduced ROT market depth can increase divergence losses, widen effective exit costs, and make the shallow SOL-ROT pool harder to leave without materially affecting execution.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and ROT into a shared pool so other users can trade between them, while you receive a share of trading fees. You can end up with more of one token and less of the other, and the value can fall if ROT moves sharply or the pool becomes difficult to exit.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- CUhNAjNQJTrLZm136NZkKiLkGPbA89MwdTSv8DVFDTN7
- Protocol
- Raydium AMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- AMM
- Token A
- SOL (So111111…)
- Token B
- rot (APoM2sXU…)
- Created
- 6/24/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
17%
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
3%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-amm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
Current reward yield is 0.0%, while fee yield is 0.5% and total APR is 0.5%. Because the reward schedule is not established, future emission decay cannot be quantified; any reduction in incentives would affect only the reward component, not the fee component.
Current reward yield is 0.0%, while fee yield is 0.5% and total APR is 0.5%. Because the reward schedule is not established, future emission decay cannot be quantified; any reduction in incentives would affect only the reward component, not the fee component.
The pool would rely on trading fees, with fee sustainability currently shown as 100%. If trading activity remains limited at the current 0.01x volume-to-TVL ratio, the resulting fee income may not justify the risks of holding the ROT exposure.
The pool would rely on trading fees, with fee sustainability currently shown as 100%. If trading activity remains limited at the current 0.01x volume-to-TVL ratio, the resulting fee income may not justify the risks of holding the ROT exposure.
Risk is elevated because ROT can move sharply against SOL, while this pool has shallow liquidity and limited trading activity. Recent impermanent-loss and range-efficiency history is unavailable, so the size of those risks cannot be estimated from the supplied history.
Risk is elevated because ROT can move sharply against SOL, while this pool has shallow liquidity and limited trading activity. Recent impermanent-loss and range-efficiency history is unavailable, so the size of those risks cannot be estimated from the supplied history.
For SOL-ROT, an exit is defensible when the live verdict remains REDUCE, the scanner remains CRITICAL, trading activity weakens, or TVL begins to drain. Do not wait for reward emissions to improve the position when current reward yield is 0.0%.
For SOL-ROT, an exit is defensible when the live verdict remains REDUCE, the scanner remains CRITICAL, trading activity weakens, or TVL begins to drain. Do not wait for reward emissions to improve the position when current reward yield is 0.0%.
No reliable break-even period can be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history and the pool's fee accumulation path are unavailable. Fee yield is 0.5%, so recovery depends on sustained trading and on ROT not continuing to diverge materially from SOL.
No reliable break-even period can be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history and the pool's fee accumulation path are unavailable. Fee yield is 0.5%, so recovery depends on sustained trading and on ROT not continuing to diverge materially from SOL.
