SOL-WOLFon Raydium CLMMCLMM
- Chain
- Solana
- TVL
- TVL $640.55K
- APR
- 0.6% APR
- 24h Volume
- $3.68K 24h vol
- Fee tier
- 0.25% fee
- Pool address
- CXxuniYw…KfEj · observed 2026-09-17
new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score is 17/100, with Enter at 15/100, Hold at 20/100, and Exit at 80/100. The live verdict is EXIT, driven by ai_engine=hold, placing the pool at rank #1000 of 4410 raydium-clmm pools. Concretely, this is a middle-of-the-distribution hold assessment rather than a strong entry signal: fee funding is a positive, but low volume relative to TVL and memecoin-specific exit risk limit the case. A TVL drain, collapse in fee income, worsening liquidity, or a sharp increase in relative-price volatility would weaken the assessment; sustained volume growth and durable fee generation would improve it.
Computed 2026-09-17 17:28 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$640.55K
Total value locked
$3.68K
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up0.6%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ 0.7%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Avoid
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Use a conservative tick range around the current SOL/WOLF price and set a hard review trigger for any sustained move outside that range or a material deterioration in 0.01x; rebalance or exit rather than leaving capital inactive after the range is lost.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 0.6% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 0.6% | — | — |
| Volume | $3.68K | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $9.20 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#2 of 2 SOL-WOLF pools
by AI Farmer Score
#1360 of 16780 on raydium-clmm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 16% of all Solana pools
overall rank #18086 of 116409
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the SOL-WOLF liquidity pool on Raydium CLMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and WOLF into a shared trading pool. Traders use that pool to swap between the tokens, and you receive part of the fees, but your holdings can shift toward the worse-performing token and may be worth less than simply holding both assets.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
SOL-WOLF decomposes into 0.6% from trading fees and 0.0% from rewards. 100% of yield comes from fees, so realized returns depend primarily on swap activity rather than emissions. Reward dependency is not established, and no time-bound reward schedule is supplied.
shieldRisk Assessment
Recent seven-day impermanent-loss and tick-in-range history is not reported, so the pool's realized range efficiency and loss profile cannot be verified. As a MEMECOIN pool, SOL-WOLF carries sharp relative-price, liquidity, and exit-slippage risk, especially when WOLF volume or market depth contracts. Any incentive program should be treated as potentially temporary: emission decay or expiry can remove support for the position, making exit timing important even when fee income persists.
tollSOL Context
SOL is the relatively established asset in this pair and has deeper liquidity across Solana venues than WOLF. For this LP, a SOL move against WOLF changes the pool's inventory through rebalancing: sustained divergence can increase exposure to the weaker asset and create impermanent loss even when fees accrue.
tollWOLF Context
WOLF is the idiosyncratic memecoin leg and is likely to determine most of the pair's liquidity and exit risk. A sharp WOLF repricing, fragmented liquidity, or reduced market participation can move the position toward WOLF while making withdrawal more costly; stronger WOLF performance can produce the opposite inventory shift.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and WOLF into a shared trading pool. Traders use that pool to swap between the tokens, and you receive part of the fees, but your holdings can shift toward the worse-performing token and may be worth less than simply holding both assets.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- CXxuniYwA3Ednq1UsYEQvHzVpamEi1gxgHo86ALwKfEj
- Protocol
- Raydium CLMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- Concentrated Liquidity (CLMM)
- Token A
- SOL (So111111…)
- Token B
- WOLF (BTr5SwWS…)
- Created
- 4/20/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
1%
APR
0%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-clmm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The current APR is split between 0.6% in fees and 0.0% in rewards, so the stated return is not materially supported by emissions. If any future rewards decay, the remaining APR would depend on trading fees, with 100% of current yield attributed to fees.
The current APR is split between 0.6% in fees and 0.0% in rewards, so the stated return is not materially supported by emissions. If any future rewards decay, the remaining APR would depend on trading fees, with 100% of current yield attributed to fees.
The reward component would fall away, leaving fee income as the economic basis for the position. Since 0.0% is the current reward-only APR and reward dependency is not established, the effect should be assessed against trading activity rather than assumed to be permanent.
The reward component would fall away, leaving fee income as the economic basis for the position. Since 0.0% is the current reward-only APR and reward dependency is not established, the effect should be assessed against trading activity rather than assumed to be permanent.
Risk is higher than in a stable or major-asset pair because WOLF can move sharply, lose liquidity, or become difficult to sell. SOL-WOLF also has $641K of liquidity and $4K of recent volume, so exit conditions can worsen quickly if market participation contracts.
Risk is higher than in a stable or major-asset pair because WOLF can move sharply, lose liquidity, or become difficult to sell. SOL-WOLF also has $641K of liquidity and $4K of recent volume, so exit conditions can worsen quickly if market participation contracts.
For SOL-WOLF, review or exit when price leaves your chosen tick range, WOLF liquidity deteriorates, or fee generation no longer compensates for the position's relative-price risk. A sustained decline in 0.01x or a TVL drain is a clearer exit signal than a short-term price move alone.
For SOL-WOLF, review or exit when price leaves your chosen tick range, WOLF liquidity deteriorates, or fee generation no longer compensates for the position's relative-price risk. A sustained decline in 0.01x or a TVL drain is a clearer exit signal than a short-term price move alone.
There is no defensible fixed break-even period because recent impermanent-loss history and range data are unavailable. The fee-only component is 0.6%, but break-even depends on how SOL and WOLF move relative to each other, how long the position remains in range, and whether fee volume persists.
There is no defensible fixed break-even period because recent impermanent-loss history and range data are unavailable. The fee-only component is 0.6%, but break-even depends on how SOL and WOLF move relative to each other, how long the position remains in range, and whether fee volume persists.
